USNavyMike
New Member
*I* am the moderator. Premium members can delete their own threads, and that's what Catt did.
I stand corrected.
thanks
usnavymike
*I* am the moderator. Premium members can delete their own threads, and that's what Catt did.
Good luck in Iraq... Godspeed coming back in one piece.I stand corrected.
thanks
usnavymike
The owner that had him for two years.
It's okay Chasey. Tommy doesn't know me, that's quite obvious. I know me and my friends know me and understand that I do the CORRECT thing where animals are concerned.
I have stated on numerous occasions that it is better to put down an aggressive dog than to try to rehome him. Mousebaby can attest to that. I just don't see Pork Chop as aggressive.
But, Catt, then what would you have done about it? Would you have taken the dog into your home and tried to find a new owner? Would JWWB have done that?
:shrug:
But, Catt, then what would you have done about it? Would you have taken the dog into your home and tried to find a new owner? Would JWWB have done that?
:shrug:
this indicated to me that this person was intending to be less than truthfull with potential families.
I know for a fact that Catt wouldn't be intentionally untruthful when farming out a dog or cat. When an animal has problems, she always says so and is upfront about it. So that's not fair or even true to say she was intending to lie.
Boxers are high energy PITA dogs (sorry, Boxer people, it's true). So what is normal to a Boxer owner is aggression to others who aren't used to this type of dog.
Mike and Bay Kat bit off more than they could chew with this dog, and I don't blame them one second for getting rid of it. I'd have done the exact same thing, and in fact I *have* done the exact same thing.
I also understand where the Boxer people are coming from, because to them it's normal for a dog to be overly rowdy, knock people down, and get aggressive with other animals. They do not see it as aggression, they see it as normal.
So it's a different perspective, and Catt was not intending to lie about the dog at all.
Exactly,
Being the moderator of the forums gives her the edge to delete the thread and continue to sway readers to the fact that Kat and I are really bad people.
At no time was it EVER mentioned that if things did not work out that PC would be returned to the original owner so lets get that untrueth straight.
Obviously the other thread showed this.
I mentioned in the previous thread that PC was awsome indoors however outside was totally different. PC knew when he did wrong in the house as he did when he devoured a loaf of bread, I found the wrapper in the living room and he was in his kennel lookin at me like O Sh&% I got caught. Not a biggie however concern here was that loaf coming out the other end all at once. The issue's with him eating the cat poo, and ciggarette butts, not an issue from where I stand, however again, its gotta come out. Eating cat toys, well he paid that price when he woke me one night drooling over my face, next thing I knew he puked and a small cat toy (mouse) came out then he was fine. He loves attention, loves playing in water and being sprayed with the hose.
BayKat explained what happened outdoors so I will not continue to feed into that frenzy. I took PC as protection and companion for my family when I am in Iraq, this does not make us bad nor uncaring, however it makes me very weary on adoption from private parties in the furture and should make others aware of liability issues which could result when not told the entire trueth on a pet.
While I was holding the lease outside of Tri, my mind was racing thinking of alternatives for the next action I was going to take. If there was a chance that the JWW would take him back I would have considered that option, however she has not came out with the reason why he couldnt stay there and why she gave him up in the first place so I will leave that part private.
Have a Blessed Day
usnavymike
Take in to account,
I know for a fact that Catt wouldn't be intentionally untruthful when farming out a dog or cat. When an animal has problems, she always says so and is upfront about it. So that's not fair or even true to say she was intending to lie.
Boxers are high energy PITA dogs (sorry, Boxer people, it's true). So what is normal to a Boxer owner is aggression to others who aren't used to this type of dog.
Mike and Bay Kat bit off more than they could chew with this dog, and I don't blame them one second for getting rid of it. I'd have done the exact same thing, and in fact I *have* done the exact same thing.
I also understand where the Boxer people are coming from, because to them it's normal for a dog to be overly rowdy, knock people down, and get aggressive with other animals. They do not see it as aggression, they see it as normal.
So it's a different perspective, and Catt was not intending to lie about the dog at all.
so she deleted the threads in the interest of full disclosure?
I have no doubt that she hasn't seen this herself, and there for doesn't 'beleive' the dog was agressive. but it shouldn't take her actually seein ghtis dog bite or kill another before she concedes that mike and bay had no reason to lie.
Let me just say this, if the dog was going to bite, he would have bit one of the kids for climbing all over him, walking around waving food, gotten one of the cats for jumping on him while he was sleeping, gone after Neo (the pug) for going after his back legs to play, ect.
He would pounce on another dog, GRRRRRRRRRRRR, and that was his way of playing. No biting, yes there was drooling, but the dog drooled a lot, even when playing.
I took PC as protection and companion for my family when I am in Iraq,
,
The dog had only been in his new home for 4 weeks. Dogs need time to adjust.
All dogs are animals. Having them in your home requires dedication and being heads up when they act like animals. I have two very nice dogs. Wonderful with kids. Those two dogs fought over a cheeto the other day (they don't even like cheetos) I had to handle the situation :shrug:
why was he in the shelter in the first place?
Ok I would like to point out two things here...
Mike you get the dog for protection, it protects the yard? So you give it up....I am sure that makes sense somewhere...
So, you have the dog for FOUR weeks and I will guess your wife figures out she can't handle the dog so you up and put him out....after FOUR weeks
so she deleted the threads in the interest of full disclosure?
so she deleted the threads in the interest of full disclosure?
I have no doubt that she hasn't seen this herself, and there for doesn't 'beleive' the dog was agressive. but it shouldn't take her actually seein ghtis dog bite or kill another before she concedes that mike and bay had no reason to lie.
Couldn't tell you why she deleted the thread. BUT I do know that she is always forthright when rehoming an animal and she has never, to my knowledge, farmed out an animal that was a known problem. I've known her for several years, and she is not a dishonest person.
so you are saying that mike and bay lied when they say he attacked 3 other dogs?
why was he in the shelter in the first place?