This_person
Well-Known Member
Defense? He's PROUD of this record!Damn. JPC, do you have any defense to that at all?
Defense? He's PROUD of this record!Damn. JPC, do you have any defense to that at all?
hvp05 said:No remorse, no payback, no accountability.
His beliefs stem from his arrogant neglect of his own child approximately 25 years ago. Now he aims to dismantle the system that tried - and, unfortunately, failed - to make him pay his dues because he is vengeful and self-serving; what's worse is he does this under the guise of "helping others".
If you are saying that "hvp" talks for me then you are wrong.Damn. JPC, do you have any defense to that at all?
If you are saying that "hvp" talks for me then you are wrong.
Call that a defense if you believe a defense of baseless slander is require for your judgement about me and my case.
This is my point that you will listen to unsustantiated slander as if it is some Gospel truth and "hvp" does not really know me or my business, and no body talks for me except myself.
My point again in that you go to look for "deadbeats" because your mom called that against your dad and because our gov has perpetrated that "deadbeat" lie against the separated parents and now believe garbage said about me.
I thought you brag on how you are going to think for yourself, find out the truth and not rush to mis-judgement, but here we see the reality in that I am called upon to defend against some pompous slanderer that pretends to speak for me - and "hvp" does not speak for me at all.
He tells you what my beliefs and my intentions are and you buy it.
So again I say you will be successful is doing the Devil's work just as you are now.
Here's his own bio page excerpted:Defense? He's PROUD of this record!
By his own admission previously, he was $27,000 in arrears, and his son's step-dad wearied of the fight to try and let Jimmy show he cared about Jimmy Jr's welfare - so he forgave the arrears (Junior's mom had died by this point, and Jimmy walked on her grave with Junior, telling Junior he felt no sympathy for the pain he caused them).Jimmy's bio said:In 1994 was the first time incarceration 3 months for child support and again 6 months in 1997. The incarcerations were done wrongfully by the Court with unethical pressure from the child support agency for St. Mary's County. Mr. Cusick did try to cooperate but the child support enforcement was too severely corrupt. So because of that corruption he was released from jail in a worse condition of homeless and destitute with the child support officials demanding more cash payments regardless of his condition so Mr. Cusick proceeded to spray paint the 4 pillars on the front of the Circuit Court house in Leonardtown with green spray paint writing out the words "Child Support is Legalized Stealing", and, "Thou Shalt Not Steal", and, "Michael Haris Thief Master", and, "Inside this Court is a Den of Thieves".
(More admissions of guilt for temper tantrums.....)
It was reasoned then that the local Courts just enforce the unjust child support laws and do not make the laws so after release in July 2000, Mr. Cusick traveled to Annapolis and spray painted the two pillars of the Maryland State House with red spray paint saying, "Child Support Thieves", and, "Thou Shalt Not Steal". Got arrested, refused to enter plea, had jury trial, sentenced to 3 years in State prison for the misdameanor.
He considers the actions to have been political crimes and thus he was a political prisoner.
That's not what you said a few days ago.If you are saying that "hvp" talks for me then you are wrong.
This is my point that you will listen to unsustantiated slander as if it is some Gospel truth and "hvp" does not really know me or my business, and no body talks for me except myself.
Well I hate to admit it but the laughing icon that you used got to me.And there you go assuming things about me for the THIRD time in one thread. And if you read a little more into that, you would see I was asking for your side of the story. If you don't wish to post anything about in public, you are more than welcome to PM me about it. I think for myself, and if I thought you were half the jackass that everyone else claims you to be, then I would have stopped replying to your posts a long time ago. So do NOT presume to tell me what I do and do not think. I don't judge you, because while I know you (though you don't even realize who I am) I know that there is more to every person than just the surface. You put on a hard ass exterior, but there is more to you than people think. And for the record, my dad was a deadbeat, and he'll tell you up front that he now regrets it. PM me. We'll talk.
See, this man does not speak for my wife's second husband,Here's his own bio page excerpted:
By his own admission previously, he was $27,000 in arrears, and his son's step-dad wearied of the fight to try and let Jimmy show he cared about Jimmy Jr's welfare - so he forgave the arrears (Junior's mom had died by this point, and Jimmy walked on her grave with Junior, telling Junior he felt no sympathy for the pain he caused them).
Well I hate to admit it but the laughing icon that you used got to me.
I want justice from the filthy thieving child support and the day will come when I will not be mocked any more.
I hope you do know me outside because then you know I mean it.
I will not PM to you until I have something to say in that way.
I like telling all my business in the open forum or to the public instead of in secret.
Saying that you understand my message does not mean that you then speak for me.That's not what you said a few days ago.
:...and the day will come when I will not be mocked any more.
Uh, okay. I don't want to speak for you - your posts are quite illuminating in of themselves; when I told bella those facts yesterday, I was giving her a summary and cutting through the crap I knew you would pose in response. But she is perfectly free to research your statements on her own.Saying that you understand my message does not mean that you then speak for me.
Let me quote this in particular...JPC sr said:And it does not mean that I agree with your twisting my message either.
First, you admitted that YOU "twist" your own message. Second, you admitted that my analysis of your "message" - whatever it may be - is accurate.That is exactly correct and it always amazes me that "hvp" seems to really know me and my message.
Well I hate to admit it but the laughing icon that you used got to me.
I want justice from the filthy thieving child support and the day will come when I will not be mocked any more.
I hope you do know me outside because then you know I mean it.
I will not PM to you until I have something to say in that way.
I like telling all my business in the open forum or to the public instead of in secret.
See my accuser "hvp" does not say anything about the subject.Uh, okay. I don't want to speak for you - your posts are quite illuminating in of themselves; when I told bella those facts yesterday, I was giving her a summary and cutting through the crap I knew you would pose in response. But she is perfectly free to research your statements on her own.
Let me quote this in particular...First, you admitted that YOU "twist" your own message. Second, you admitted that my analysis of your "message" - whatever it may be - is accurate.
Your dementia truly is saddening - to watch you hopelessly deny facts so obvious any kindergartner could understand them.
It is trash, but it is YOUR bio page. And, I wasn't there, I admit that. I can only go by what YOU told me. Would you like me to find the links AGAIN?See, this man does not speak for my wife's second husband, and he does not speak for my son, and he was not at my wife's grave.
This person is posting filthy trash.
Attacking the messenger instead of the message? Weak....See my accuser "hvp" does not say anything about the subject.
Nothing about women, nothing about child support, not even a comment on the weather.
He tries personal attacks to slander me is all he offers and I am expected to defend against such trash, I say not.
Claiming her benevolence and her high claims of righteouness are no excuse for thievery,I doubt that you will understand this or believe it but I did not want any Court system to "steal" anything from my children's father. My income was not sufficient to support myself and three children. We lost our home although I did manage to keep us afloat for six months BY MYSELF by, as I said before, using every spare cent I could liquidate. How is it "stealing" to have a man who helped to create 3 children to continue to help see to their well-being? The child support amount was based on a portion of his earnings which were significantly greater than mine. I could somewhat understand if you were screaming about spousal support but you are raging against children who had no say in their own births.
Didn't the father make the babies too? Yet, he provided nothing until forced. Yea system, you helped someone out again! More proof there are parents out there that YOU claim don't exist, Jimmy. And, here, you acknowledge their existance.Did she make 3 babies with the man? but to get money she must seek the assistance of thieves.
Which was the first affair? Where was her sin, or her children's sin?People get a sinful divorce, she wants to keep the property like it is her right, and then demands payments so the next affair need not be burdened by the cost of those children.
The system of abandoning children with no remorse on the abandoning parent's part and no recourse on the abandonded children's part was broken as soon as a child support enforcement system was created. YOU are living proof. This family above is living proof.The thieving system will break and it is only a matter of time.
Claiming her benevolence and her high claims of righteouness are no excuse for thievery,
and it is an unworthy excuse for receiving the stolen child support money.
Did she make 3 babies with the man? but to get money she must seek the assistance of thieves.
People get a sinful divorce, she wants to keep the property like it is her right, and then demands payments so the next affair need not be burdened by the cost of those children.
The laws we have now make divorce seem pretty when it is not, the laws violate the family unit, laws now that attack the parents and degrade the children, and custodials that demand more.
We already have millions of parents that defy the dirty thieving child support and growing more every day.
The thieving system will break and it is only a matter of time.
Claiming her benevolence and her high claims of righteouness are no excuse for thievery,
and it is an unworthy excuse for receiving the stolen child support money.
Did she make 3 babies with the man? but to get money she must seek the assistance of thieves.
People get a sinful divorce, she wants to keep the property like it is her right, and then demands payments so the next affair need not be burdened by the cost of those children.
The laws we have now make divorce seem pretty when it is not, the laws violate the family unit, laws now that attack the parents and degrade the children, and custodials that demand more.
We already have millions of parents that defy the dirty thieving child support and growing more every day.
The thieving system will break and it is only a matter of time.