I presume you are implying that George Bush "forces" his religious beliefs on you? How has he done that?UrbanPancake said:They also don't try to run for political office and force there beliefs on everyone.
I presume you are implying that George Bush "forces" his religious beliefs on you? How has he done that?UrbanPancake said:They also don't try to run for political office and force there beliefs on everyone.
When I said Bush seems to believe that he is God's representative on earth, that is my opinion of his mindset, based on the two statements I cited. As I said before, I don't really know what is in his mind.Sharon said:Is this your opinion?
If not, please provide sources for this statement as I've never heard him say this before.
Thanks!
SamSpade said:Why? I haven't seen whether or not you believe in God, or what kind of God you believe in, or if you have any faith in any part of the Bible. But it does say that he works all things for the good of those who love him and are called according to his purpose. Joseph in the Old Testament explains his years of misery after being sold by his brothers "You intended to harm me, but God intended it for good to accomplish what is now being done, the saving of many lives."
The Christian perspective is not that everything that happens is God's will, but that he will work with it for the good, for he will not interfere with our choices.
In the New Testament it says "Everyone must submit himself to the governing authorities, for there is no authority except that which God has established. The authorities that exist have been established by God. Consequently, he who rebels against the authority is rebelling against what God has instituted, and those who do so will bring judgment on themselves." and "Honor the Emperor" (written by Peter - so the 'emperor' was probably *Nero*). It does NOT mean the authority is righteous - only that it is there because God permitted it.
It's fair to say that things are as they are not because God *wills* it, but that God *permits* it, and uses it for the good. In such a case, should Kerry be elected, it can concur with the will of God.
It reminds me of the ancient Egyptians when the Pharoh was considered a living God.Tonio said:When I said Bush seems to believe that he is God's representative on earth, that is my opinion of his mindset, based on the two statements I cited. As I said before, I don't really know what is in his mind.
The way I see it, this isn't a case of Bush having a strong religious faith. If it was nothing more than that, I would say more power to him.
But when he says that God chose him to be president and that God speaks through him, that sounds almost, but not quite, like he's claiming to be God. This might be a reach, but I was reminded a little of Col. Kurtz in "Apocalypse Now."
I have no clue what you think I said, but it's obvius that you need some help with reading comprehension. I was simply making the statement that having strong religious beliefs is not what makes someone dangerous. Then I gave an example of a large group of people with religious extremist views, but they are also very peaceful.UrbanPancake said:Comparing the Amish is like comparing Saddam to Bush... wait a minute there the same person, it's like comparing apples and bananas. Even though the Amish are religious they welcome homosexuals into there community. As a matter of fact I think the Amish should become politically active. I think they could make this country better.
UrbanPancake said:The bible plays no part in politics.
Tonio said:But when he says that God chose him to be president and that God speaks through him, that sounds almost, but not quite, like he's claiming to be God.
You mean those religious nuts with guns? Don't think DURbanPancake likes them much.PrchJrkr said:I wonder if the founding fathers of our country felt this way...
Bush had a meeting with several Amish families in Pennsylvania on July 9. In the July 16 issue of the Lancaster New Era, he was quoted as saying, "I trust God speaks through me. Without that, I couldn't do my job."</NITF>SamSpade said:IF he actually said this - *I'd* worry about him too. But I can't believe he'd say this.
I agree, and that is part of my point. Bush's statements showed a lack of humility.Men who live with humilty and faith are men to be admired.
I should scare you about as much as George Washington, Thomas Payne, and Nathan Hale would. They were deeply religious men that were armed.jlabsher said:You scare me dude, and the fact that you are armed scares me even more!
All true Christians believe that God speaks to them and through them. If he said this (link please), then he was just saying what the Bible says happens; that no authority is granted to men except by God.Tonio said:Bush had a meeting with several Amish families in Pennsylvania on July 9. In the July 16 issue of the Lancaster New Era, he was quoted as saying, "I trust God speaks through me. Without that, I couldn't do my job."
http://lancasteronline.com/pages/news/local/4/7565 (you have to register to read the full article, but I read it all before it went into the archives).2ndAmendment said:All true Christians believe that God speaks to them and through them. If he said this (link please), then he was just saying what the Bible says happens; that no authority is granted to men except by God.
Tonio said:Bush had a meeting with several Amish families in Pennsylvania on July 9. In the July 16 issue of the Lancaster New Era, he was quoted as saying, "I trust God speaks through me. Without that, I couldn't do my job."</NITF>
What's so scary about that? To me all that means is that Bush meditates and gets his head together and tries to do the right thing - or the Christian thing, if you will.Tonio said:Bush had a meeting with several Amish families in Pennsylvania on July 9. In the July 16 issue of the Lancaster New Era, he was quoted as saying, "I trust God speaks through me. Without that, I couldn't do my job."
Hessian said:Government schools have put such stringent regulation about teaching "faith/religion" that they have sterilized the teaching of History.
Thus you end up with Urbanpancake & Jblasher in utter fear of a leader with a clear faith. Also...they have a skewed view of our foundings,...they never heard of the Great Awakening,..They don't see Lincoln's reasoning that a house divided against itself cannot stand (yes...from scripture). They miss all the analogies in art, debate, speech that rely on the audience having a knowledge of scripture.
In the end: a very incompetant education. "Greater love hath no man than to lay down his life for another." is utter foolishness to them. Why? They are the most important person in their limited universe.
Bush frightens them, politically active Christians frighten them, passing laws that preseve the 10 commandments frightens them, they are baffled by people who ask a Blessing before a meal, Pat Robertson is the same as Osama in their eyes...Do you see where this is going? A segment of the population that does not understand our origins, lives in fear and wonder but are willing to denounce, shout down, demand rights...but are incapable of an informed opinion.
Catholics and Protestants have for centuries pushed education, reading, writing, law, and yes..even science. Some of the most informed & well reasoned people have been devout Christians. Will this generation be the last to respect our Christian foundations & benefits?
That's not how I read the quote. I read it as him saying that God speaks ONLY through him. If someone believes he is chosen by God to do His will on earth, doesn't that mean he believes he doesn't have to be accountable to anyone on earth? What's to stop human arrogance from kicking in? Something like, "Hey buddy, when you criticize me, you criticize God. You're owned!"2ndAmendment said:All true Christians believe that God speaks to them and through them. If he said this (link please), then he was just saying what the Bible says happens; that no authority is granted to men except by God.
Nothing wrong with prophets in this day or previous times. The test of a prophet is that his words will not be in conflict with the Word of God and they will come true. The consequence for claiming to be a prophet and speaking a prophetic utterance is that if the person that does that is ever wrong, that person is to be killed. No room for error here.SamSpade said:Well that is a little spooky, but having known many preachers and religious leaders, I get the concept of being used as a vessel for God while not claiming any status as a "prophet".