Presidential Debates 2012

bcp

In My Opinion
I do believe that everyone knows that already, and nobody truly doubts that.

The Republican Party has become the white superiority Party.

But fortunately - thank God, not all of us white-folk subscribe to that grand old bigotry.

We vote Democrat.

:

But, why then have the republicans run more blacks for office than the democrats?
Why is it that the democrats insist on keeping the minority on the welfare plantation?

I think you are wrong JPC, the democrats are the true racists here. and they prove it every day.

Now, go slap yourself and hang your head in shame.
 

JPCusick

My real name.
Reply.

But, why then have the republicans run more blacks for office than the democrats?

I do not know if that claim is really accurate, because the Republicans might count those during the reconstruction years 1863-1877, while the Republican Party after President Eisenhower are a bunch of racist dogs and immoral warmonger.

Plus the Democratic Party after Eisenhower has become a more compassionate Party representing the better interest of all Americans.

President Eisenhower 1953-1961 was a true turning point for both Parties.

Why is it that the democrats insist on keeping the minority on the welfare plantation?

I know that your kind of whites and the Republicans like to refer to "welfare" as having some connection to the old slave plantations, but the plantations used whips and brute force against the defenseless people so there was nothing like "welfare" on any slave plantation.

I say the Republicans who want to force the very poor population into the low trashy jobs that do not even pay a subsistence is the true plantation mentality.

I think you are wrong JPC, the democrats are the true racists here. and they prove it every day.

Now, go slap yourself and hang your head in shame.

From a statement like that you really do not understand what the word "racist" means.

Link = On Racism and White Privilege | Teaching Tolerance

Us whites and us Democrats putting a black Man into the white house as our President is not racist.

:whistle:
 

bcp

In My Opinion
I do not know if that claim is really accurate, because the Republicans might count those during the reconstruction years 1863-1877, while the Republican Party after President Eisenhower are a bunch of racist dogs and immoral warmonger.

Plus the Democratic Party after Eisenhower has become a more compassionate Party representing the better interest of all Americans.

President Eisenhower 1953-1961 was a true turning point for both Parties.



I know that your kind of whites and the Republicans like to refer to "welfare" as having some connection to the old slave plantations, but the plantations used whips and brute force against the defenseless people so there was nothing like "welfare" on any slave plantation.

I say the Republicans who want to force the very poor population into the low trashy jobs that do not even pay a subsistence is the true plantation mentality.



From a statement like that you really do not understand what the word "racist" means.

Link = On Racism and White Privilege | Teaching Tolerance

Us whites and us Democrats putting a black Man into the white house as our President is not racist.

:whistle:

one thing is for sure, without question, blacks are less able than whites when it comes to learning.
I dont think even you can argue that point.
 

cheezgrits

Thought pirate
Yes, I really do vote.

But still an internet politician too.

I voted on the first chance I had when I was 16 years old and I voted for Richard Nixon (R).

It was a mistake then - as I know that now.

Later I voted for Ronald Reagan which was another mistake of mine, but I did vote.

There is the thought that the mistake was theirs more-so than my mistake, since they were the ones who betrayed us all.

:bigwhoop:

You want to go back and rethink that math?

You were born in 1956.
Nixon won the election in 1968.
You were 12.
You would have been eligible to vote in the 1974 elections, which means you could have voted for either Carter or Ford in 1976.

Soooo, want to rethink that? Either you're lying about your age in your bio, or you are lying about voting for Nixon.

Well......
 

MMDad

Lem Putt
You want to go back and rethink that math?

You were born in 1956.
Nixon won the election in 1968.
You were 12.
You would have been eligible to vote in the 1974 elections, which means you could have voted for either Carter or Ford in 1976.

Soooo, want to rethink that? Either you're lying about your age in your bio, or you are lying about voting for Nixon.

Well......

Or he's admitting to voter fraud.
 

Bay_Kat

Tropical
You want to go back and rethink that math?

You were born in 1956.
Nixon won the election in 1968.
You were 12.
You would have been eligible to vote in the 1974 elections, which means you could have voted for either Carter or Ford in 1976.

Soooo, want to rethink that? Either you're lying about your age in your bio, or you are lying about voting for Nixon.

Well......

Or he's admitting to voter fraud.

He's a moron and has proven many times he has no idea what he's talking about.
 

JPCusick

My real name.
Reply.

You want to go back and rethink that math?

You were born in 1956.
Nixon won the election in 1968.
You were 12.
You would have been eligible to vote in the 1974 elections, which means you could have voted for either Carter or Ford in 1976.

Soooo, want to rethink that? Either you're lying about your age in your bio, or you are lying about voting for Nixon.

Well......

You must be correct as I got the math wrong.

I was thinking that we started voting at the age of 16 and there was my error.

My family was always political and so at those times I heard about the elections and I made my own decisions at those times and as such it remembered as if I had voted when clearly I did not.

So you are correct that my first real vote for President would have been for Jimmy Carter as I did not like Nixon being caught doing wrong and then resigning from office, and I saw Ford as a puppet for Nixon giving him the pardon.

It is still not a lie, as I just got the time and the age and the technicalities confused and got that all wrong, but being wrong is not a lie.

:popcorn:
 

JPCusick

My real name.
Repair.

one thing is for sure, without question, blacks are less able than whites when it comes to learning.
I dont think even you can argue that point.

That is kind-of correct and kind-of not correct, as I see that as one of those slick fancy white lies.

As in the black people are not physically or mentally less able to learn, but they are less able to learn the white teachings which are taught in our schools.

The black people do NOT learn the lies as do the white people.

There are very many African American students who drop out of school or fail at school or are put out of the various schools and Colleges based on their inability to embrace and to learn the white lies as the schools teach.

The white students seem to embrace and to learn the white lies with ease and so the white students do appear to be more intelligent and to be better learners and that is very misleading.

Many if not most white students graduate as very educated and even very intelligent bigots and racist as a result of their learning.

:patriot:
 

Gilligan

#*! boat!
PREMO Member
As in the black people are not physically or mentally less able to learn, but they are less able to learn the white teachings which are taught in our schools.

:

:killingme:killingme

Say Jimmy...I googled the heck out of that and could not come up with a single reference that even addresses that wild hypothesis of yours. Help a curious fella out and post some links, 'kay?
 

ylexot

Super Genius
That is kind-of correct and kind-of not correct, as I see that as one of those slick fancy white lies.

As in the black people are not physically or mentally less able to learn, but they are less able to learn the white teachings which are taught in our schools.

The black people do NOT learn the lies as do the white people.

There are very many African American students who drop out of school or fail at school or are put out of the various schools and Colleges based on their inability to embrace and to learn the white lies as the schools teach.

The white students seem to embrace and to learn the white lies with ease and so the white students do appear to be more intelligent and to be better learners and that is very misleading.

Many if not most white students graduate as very educated and even very intelligent bigots and racist as a result of their learning.

:patriot:

Is there white math and black math?
Is there white science and black science?
Is there white English and black English?

Those are the three main areas of education. The only area teaching area where you might be correct is history...which is a secondary subject.
 

bcp

In My Opinion
Is there white math and black math?
Is there white science and black science?
Is there white English and black English?

Those are the three main areas of education. The only area teaching area where you might be correct is history...which is a secondary subject.

I was going to ask the same thing.
I'm not really sure what the white lies are when it comes to Science, Math or English. I do understand the white lies that are changing history to make it look like other cultures (non white) contributed everything that makes life good. (part of the white guilt complex)
Expect sometime in the not so distant future to find out that it was an effort by the blacks, and hispanics that built the United States while the uneducated white people walked around drooling on themselves.
 

JPCusick

My real name.
Repair.

Is there white math and black math?
Is there white science and black science?
Is there white English and black English?

Those are the three main areas of education. The only area teaching area where you might be correct is history...which is a secondary subject.

The twisted and hateful teaching of the white-washed history is only a secondary subject and an insignificant white lie in the white folk opinion.

There would not be any difference between math, science, English, excepting for the fact that the white people have unjustly included and injected the white differences into those subjects.

For math they teach people to think in terms of numbers as if people are robots, and that the world and life are deductible into math equations.

White people "calculate" life and life events as if human beings are robotic numbers - being like the Borg = you will be assimilated ... resistance is futile.

Math is a big delusion for white people, as like the idea that we can vote for our leader, as if the calculated numbers have some powerful meaning, regardless of the virtue or defects of that leader, because the whites bow to the numbers and then expects everyone to bow to the numbers. Another example is that a person is convicted of possession of some drug and then given three (3) years in prison, as if 1+1=3, because the white math is based on the mentality of brutes.

As to the white science - we teach the ignorant racist idea of evolution where the Africans evolved from monkeys and the white people are the superior end product of the evolution, and we whites call this racist trash as science indeed. And the white science includes things like the exploitation of space for billions of dollars while human beings on earth are denied basic health care, and yet to pass a science test then everyone must give the white answer or else be graded as wrong.

As to the white English - our white language has always been misused as a weapon against every other culture on the planet earth, we misuse the language to destroy other cultures, and English is a very inadequate language as most of our English words have no real meaning outside of the dictionary.

In example our English names are just sounds instead of meanings, as in other cultures and languages the person's name were to have a meaning. As like American Indian names meant things like "Sitting Bull" or "Crazy Horse" and so were African names link HERE, while the English language is militaristic and calculated without rhythm or meaning or substance.

As like the name "George Bush" then one might think he had some thing to do with a "bush" but no, and the name George has an old Greek meaning but in English it is just letters with no real meaning.

In our schools they brainwash all of the students with white-lies and with white worthless nonsense.

:whistle:
 

warneckutz

Well-Known Member
Wirelessly posted

JPCusick said:
Is there white math and black math?
Is there white science and black science?
Is there white English and black English?

Those are the three main areas of education. The only area teaching area where you might be correct is history...which is a secondary subject.

The twisted and hateful teaching of the white-washed history is only a secondary subject and an insignificant white lie in the white folk opinion.

There would not be any difference between math, science, English, excepting for the fact that the white people have unjustly included and injected the white differences into those subjects.

For math they teach people to think in terms of numbers as if people are robots, and that the world and life are deductible into math equations.

White people "calculate" life and life events as if human beings are robotic numbers - being like the Borg = you will be assimilated ... resistance is futile.

Math is a big delusion for white people, as like the idea that we can vote for our leader, as if the calculated numbers have some powerful meaning, regardless of the virtue or defects of that leader, because the whites bow to the numbers and then expects everyone to bow to the numbers. Another example is that a person is convicted of possession of some drug and then given three (3) years in prison, as if 1+1=3, because the white math is based on the mentality of brutes.

As to the white science - we teach the ignorant racist idea of evolution where the Africans evolved from monkeys and the white people are the superior end product of the evolution, and we whites call this racist trash as science indeed. And the white science includes things like the exploitation of space for billions of dollars while human beings on earth are denied basic health care, and yet to pass a science test then everyone must give the white answer or else be graded as wrong.

As to the white English - our white language has always been misused as a weapon against every other culture on the planet earth, we misuse the language to destroy other cultures, and English is a very inadequate language as most of our English words have no real meaning outside of the dictionary.

In example our English names are just sounds instead of meanings, as in other cultures and languages the person's name were to have a meaning. As like American Indian names meant things like "Sitting Bull" or "Crazy Horse" and so were African names link HERE, while the English language is militaristic and calculated without rhythm or meaning or substance.

As like the name "George Bush" then one might think he had some thing to do with a "bush" but no, and the name George has an old Greek meaning but in English it is just letters with no real meaning.

In our schools they brainwash all of the students with white-lies and with white worthless nonsense.

:whistle:

Wow! You are a moron!
 

Gilligan

#*! boat!
PREMO Member
Wow. He really is insane.


I clung to the idea that most of it had to be an act. Clung a little too long, apparently.
 

bcp

In My Opinion
Why? You will still get your welfare money regardless of who wins.

maybe not, what if Romney wins, he looks at those racist white numbers that mean nothing, and he sees the amount of welfare and disability that is being spent, and then he forces an investigation to see if it is all real, or if there are some taking a free ride instead of working.
JPC could find himself sweeping the McDonalds lot for 8 hours a day instead of walking to the mailbox once a month.
 

cheezgrits

Thought pirate
You must be correct as I got the math wrong.

I was thinking that we started voting at the age of 16 and there was my error.

My family was always political and so at those times I heard about the elections and I made my own decisions at those times and as such it remembered as if I had voted when clearly I did not.

So you are correct that my first real vote for President would have been for Jimmy Carter as I did not like Nixon being caught doing wrong and then resigning from office, and I saw Ford as a puppet for Nixon giving him the pardon.

It is still not a lie, as I just got the time and the age and the technicalities confused and got that all wrong, but being wrong is not a lie.

:popcorn:

You did not tell the truth. You lied.

I'm simply using your own logic on you in case you didn't notice.
 
Top