Presidential Debates 2012

JPCusick

My real name.
Repair.

You did not tell the truth. You lied.

I'm simply using your own logic on you in case you didn't notice.

You are NOT using my logic, as making a mistake is not a lie.

I do not claim to be infallible or to be perfect, and to lie means some thing far different than being wrong.

If anyone ever tries to seek the truth - then you would find that we must go through lots of wrongs and assorted lies before ever reaching the truth.



+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++


It must have been that racist white math that led you astray.

Yes, I am still infected by it too.

:whistle:
 

Gilligan

#*! boat!
PREMO Member
You are NOT using my logic, as making a mistake is not a lie.

:

When a person intentionally makes a "mistake", as you almost always do, it's simply a lie. Yes, Jimmy..you are simply a liar..and quite often. I'm nearly the same age you are...and I can honestly state I've never seen a liar like you in my life.
 

cheezgrits

Thought pirate
You are NOT using my logic, as making a mistake is not a lie.

I do not claim to be infallible or to be perfect, and to lie means some thing far different than being wrong.

If anyone ever tries to seek the truth - then you would find that we must go through lots of wrongs and assorted lies before ever reaching the truth.

Was it a true or false statement that you voted for Nixon. If you had been eligible to vote in that election, and you forgot who you voted for, that would be one thing.

You were 12, you wrote that statement that you voted for Nixon, knowing full well you didn't. You did not write the truth. Period.
 

JPCusick

My real name.
Repair.

Was it a true or false statement that you voted for Nixon. If you had been eligible to vote in that election, and you forgot who you voted for, that would be one thing.

You were 12, you wrote that statement that you voted for Nixon, knowing full well you didn't. You did not write the truth. Period.

I was really thinking about the second reelection of Nixon in 1972 when I was 16 years old.

Plus it was my own personal past from some 35 - 40 years ago, as I am 56 years old now, so a technical mistake from 40 years ago is just a human failing and not a lie.

And I do confess that yes I did make a mistake as my info given that time was not true.

:shrug:
 

cheezgrits

Thought pirate
I was really thinking about the second reelection of Nixon in 1972 when I was 16 years old.

Plus it was my own personal past from some 35 - 40 years ago, as I am 56 years old now, so a technical mistake from 40 years ago is just a human failing and not a lie.

And I do confess that yes I did make a mistake as my info given that time was not true.

:shrug:

:doh:

Nixon was never re-elected. Plus, if he would have had a "second re-election", it would be a third term and we don't have those in this country.

Just admit you made something up, and be done with it.
 

JPCusick

My real name.
Repair.

Nixon was never re-elected.

Yes, Nixon was reelected to his second term.

See link here = Nixon Is Re-Elected to a Second Term, Winning All But 17 of Electoral Votes | News | The Harvard Crimson 1972

It was President Ford who had the partial term after Nixon resigned.

And that does NOT mean that you told a lie, as it was a simple human mistake which happens to everyone.

No one is perfect or infallible as we all make mistakes and errors and just happen to be wrong some times without any of it being a lie.

Welcome to humanity.

:whistle:
 

JPCusick

My real name.
Reply.

IMHO, they are both losers, and show what a sorry state this country is in if these 2 clowns are the best candidates for president this country could come up with at least Obama has a record of being a xxxxxx president. That is all carry on.

I wish that we had better candidates too.

I see Obama as not quite as worse as the other guy.

So now the debates are finished, and next is to see who wins the campaign.

If that Republican monster wins as President then I will probably have to stop watching the News, and I might become one of those survivalist waiting for the anarchy and the cataclysm to come down on us all.

If Obama gets reelected then I can expect to survive another four (4) years until the next dangerous election.

:duel:
 

bcp

In My Opinion
I wish that we had better candidates too.

I see Obama as not quite as worse as the other guy.

So now the debates are finished, and next is to see who wins the campaign.

If that Republican monster wins as President then I will probably have to stop watching the News, and I might become one of those survivalist waiting for the anarchy and the cataclysm to come down on us all.

If Obama gets reelected then I can expect to survive another four (4) years until the next dangerous election.

:duel:

which of the two examples would be most likely to braing about anarchy
1) total loss of all income.
no fuel for heat or lighting
forced jobs without pay
no food on the shelves
government control over the ability of citizens to defend themselves.

2) Fuel produced in our own country
Income based on personal initiative
Freedom to choose ones job or profession
affordable food on the shelves
almost no government control over the citizens
 

Bay_Kat

Tropical
I wish that we had better candidates too.

I see Obama as not quite as worse as the other guy.

So now the debates are finished, and next is to see who wins the campaign.

If that Republican monster wins as President then I will probably have to stop watching the News, and I might become one of those survivalist waiting for the anarchy and the cataclysm to come down on us all.

If Obama gets reelected then I can expect to survive another four (4) years until the next dangerous election.

:duel:

I have a better idea, just moved out of the country. Move to the middle east, the'll love you there.
 

cheezgrits

Thought pirate
Really, JPC, just what do you know about any candidates, other than what you think you should say as a democrat? You're not really sure are you?

You just want a candidate that will support entitlements.

You are just one of those folks that reinforce my belief that you should have to pass a test to be allowed to vote.
 

JoeRider

Federalist Live Forever
Really, JPC, just what do you know about any candidates, other than what you think you should say as a democrat? You're not really sure are you?

You just want a candidate that will support entitlements.

You are just one of those folks that reinforce my belief that you should have to pass a test to be allowed to vote.

I bet you could give him the answers and he still would not pass.
 

JPCusick

My real name.
Reply.

which of the two examples would be most likely to braing about anarchy
1) total loss of all income.
no fuel for heat or lighting
forced jobs without pay
no food on the shelves
government control over the ability of citizens to defend themselves.

2) Fuel produced in our own country
Income based on personal initiative
Freedom to choose ones job or profession
affordable food on the shelves
almost no government control over the citizens

Neither Party and neither candidate for President offers either of your options.

What we do get to chose is little hope in Obama and no hope in Romney.

:bigwhoop:
 

bcp

In My Opinion
Neither Party and neither candidate for President offers either of your options.

What we do get to chose is little hope in Obama and no hope in Romney.

:bigwhoop:

Sorry, but both not only offer these things, one of them has already started the destruction.

I guess since you have no way to pull yourself up, you would welcome watching others drop down to your level.
 
Top