I wouldn't have a problem with it because I don't do any of those things. If someone else did, there are plenty of other places to eat.Agree or disagree?
![]()
Amazed how critics went STRAIGHT TO RACISM and anti-LGBTQ+. Like they made up the rest of the rules just for THEM.Considering how the place used to be run (link) I think they should go back to the way it was.
There are subgroiups that are notorious for low/not tipping. I would guess they make up a significant portion of their clientele. The same with the returning of food. Some people eat half the meal, then gripe that it's too salty or not hot enough. Then they demand a full refund. I have no doubt this is what occurred to cause them to make that rule.Not sure I would go - anyone who concocted rules like those would likely have "unwritten" ones also.
The automatic gratuity and no returns, I would have a problem with. I don't fuss much at restaurants, but those kinds of rules protect bad service and poor quality.
Imagine having people COME TO YOU to have you provide a service, and then they tell you that you are self-important for having standards.Kind of self-important sounding. Control freaks.