Naw, I seriously believe people need it.:fixed:
You two argue like husband and wife....so it is your position that the only death threats Glenn Beck has gotten, so far, are from Ron Paul supporters, eh?
BTW, Hillary has refused, for years, to be interviewed by Beck. And I will bet you Beck has gotten plenty of nasty grams from Hillary supports for the pillorying he gives her on a regular basis on his shows.
Pillory? Hillary?
Coincidence? I think not.
As a side note - I love Glenn Beck. Now back to the topic.
BTW, Hillary has refused, for years, to be interviewed by Beck.
Guess why?
...because she'll get death threats from Ron Paul?
He'll ask questions she doesn't want to answer? :shrug:Guess why?
Sober up before I get there tomorrow, please.
...and when you get here you can unwrap your sense of humor I've got sitting here for you.
Again, if Ron Paul cannot even lead his supporters, I have no reason to believe that he can lead the country.
Maybe he thinks it's better to lead the 99+% of his supporters who are merely interested in following the Constitution than to deal with the <1% of his supporters who are nut-jobs :shrug:
If you give me a sense of humor for Christmas, I'll just regift it.
The one thing Ron Paul has done to indict he has a race issue is not publicly and clearly saying he disagrees with Duke.
Has he been asked? :shrug:
Naw, I seriously believe people need it.
Think about the single mother who works two jobs and still doesn't have enough money to pay rent.
This was my mother. Did the welfare system help her out? Nope. "She made too much money" because she actually had a job. She couldn't get insurance through the state because she made too much money. When she didn't have a job, they didn't do anything to help her. They never considered the cost of FOOD, RENT, ELECTRICITY, ETC.
Thank heavens for South Potomac Church.
Welfare, however, bought our neighbor a brand new 2007 Ford Mustang.
People DO need help. Right now, the welfare system is just backwards.
...what non-sequitur means, especially in this day and age, are the ones who don't care.
The one thing Ron Paul has done to indict he has a race issue is not publicly and clearly saying he disagrees with Duke.
If you were running for office and appealing to evangelicals and I, a known agnostic and supporter of gay marriage, came out and said 'I support 2a because he defers to the constitution' how much explaining do you think you might want to do to your audience?
Pol Pot sounds a bit like 'Ron Paul'
None. While we share some common beliefs we also do not agree on some areas. I think it is a mountain out of a none issue, but obviously you have a problem with the issue. I don't. I have read enough of Ron Paul's statements to believe that even though David Duke supports Ron, Ron is not a white supremest.
I believe that people need welfare, but it should not be a federal function. Welfare needs tailored administration so that it is not abused and that cannot be done by a national entity.