Damn... So now you're gonna go after Black people again?
thehill.com
You know, for as long as I can remember, some groups have always had a few fanatics. I mean, honestly, you're a perfect example of that. Why are you not out supporting the Trans, LGBTQ, Jews, or group du jour you so adamantly profess to have alliances with? Why do you waste your time on a forum that you obviously have no common ground with, despise whatever comments are written and argue with the commentators? Could it be that even the groups you supposedly support, dont want your support, are you considered to be a fanatic among your own peers?Well no. It's because they are one dear
Here are six reasons why Moms for Liberty is an extremist organization:
1. Featured speakers at the “Joyful Warriors Summit” included Katharine Gorka, an anti-Muslim activist, who has advocated “shutting down radical mosques” in the U.S.; North Carolina Lt. Gov. Mark Robinson, who believes teaching children about sexual orientation and gender identity is child abuse, homosexuality is “filth” and the transgender rights movement is “demonic” and “full of the Antichrist spirit”; and KrisAnne Hall, who compared the U.S. Capitol police to Nazi SS troops and claims the government of the United States “has no authority outside the PERMISSION of the sheriff” and “is just as much of a federal power as France or Texas within your state.”
2. Prominent members of Moms for Liberty have close ties to the Proud Boys, Three Percenters, QAnon and white Christian nationalists. Proud Boys leader Enrique Tarrio once boasted that Moms for Liberty is “the gestapo with vaginas.”
3. The front cover of “The Parent Brigade,” the newsletter of the Hamilton County, Ind., chapter of Moms for Liberty, recently carried a quote from Adolf Hitler: “He alone, who OWNS the youth, gains the future.” At a media training session at last week’s summit, Christian Ziegler, chair of Florida’s Republican Party (and Bridget Ziegler’s husband), questioned the decision of chapter leaders to apologize: “The media is not your friend … Never apologize. Apologizing makes you weak.”
4. Tiffany Justice’s confrontations with teachers were “so disruptive and disrespectful,” administrators threatened to bar her from the school. The chair of the Monroe County, Pa., chapter of Moms for Liberty was arrested for harassment; the head of communications for the Lenoke County, Ark., chapter allegedly threatened librarians with gun violence; a restraining order was issued to the chair of the Livingston County, Mich., chapter after she reportedly told school board members, “We’re coming after you. Take it as a threat. Call the FBI. I don’t care.”
5. The chair of the El Paso County, Colo., chapter raised the hypothetical of a teacher telling a tomboy, “it might be time to transition. Let’s go talk to the school therapist. Let’s go talk to a physician. Let’s do this.” She believes “teachers, unions and the president” are engaged in a coordinated effort to make children trans and gay to “break down the family unit, conservative values,” and “slowly erode constitutional rights.” However, she does not know of anyone who transitioned because of social pressure.
6. The Williamson County, Tenn., chapter of Moms for Liberty alleged a book about Martin Luther King Jr. and the March on Washington promotes “anti-American, anti-White, anti-Mexican” instruction, singling out a photo of segregated water fountains and an image of firefighters hosing down Black children. The chapter also demanded the removal of “The Story of Ruby Bridges,” about a six-year old who integrated a school in Louisiana in 1960.
Six reasons why Moms for Liberty is an extremist organization
Moms for Liberty extremists are making our schools — and our democracy — worse.
Strike up the conversation with your shrink on the likelihood hood of you taking your own life when trump is acquitted. Maybe she can up your meds or something. You need to be prepared for yet another let down on the while trump being guilty of something other than hurting your feeling s.
That’s what you believe? Are you a constitutional law scholar now? Everyone who hates trump believes what you believe and everyone who doesn’t believes otherwise. Who’s right and who is wrong? Way I see is people tend to twist the meaning of the words in the constitution to fit what they believe.
www.theatlantic.com
Well no, You got one big problem there Zipperhead.Well no. But many Conservative constitutional scholars have made very convincing arguments.
As students of the United States Constitution for many decades—one of us as a U.S. Court of Appeals judge, the other as a professor of constitutional law, and both as constitutional advocates, scholars, and practitioners—we long ago came to the conclusion that the Fourteenth Amendment, the amendment ratified in 1868 that represents our nation’s second founding and a new birth of freedom, contains within it a protection against the dissolution of the republic by a treasonous president.
This protection, embodied in the amendment’s often-overlooked Section 3, automatically excludes from future office and position of power in the United States government—and also from any equivalent office and position of power in the sovereign states and their subdivisions—any person who has taken an oath to support and defend our Constitution and thereafter rebels against that sacred charter, either through overt insurrection or by giving aid or comfort to the Constitution’s enemies.
The Constitution Prohibits Trump From Ever Being President Again
The only question is whether American citizens today can uphold that commitment.
Well no. But many Conservative constitutional scholars have made very convincing arguments.
As students of the United States Constitution for many decades—one of us as a U.S. Court of Appeals judge, the other as a professor of constitutional law, and both as constitutional advocates, scholars, and practitioners—we long ago came to the conclusion that the Fourteenth Amendment, the amendment ratified in 1868 that represents our nation’s second founding and a new birth of freedom, contains within it a protection against the dissolution of the republic by a treasonous president.
This protection, embodied in the amendment’s often-overlooked Section 3, automatically excludes from future office and position of power in the United States government—and also from any equivalent office and position of power in the sovereign states and their subdivisions—any person who has taken an oath to support and defend our Constitution and thereafter rebels against that sacred charter, either through overt insurrection or by giving aid or comfort to the Constitution’s enemies.
The Constitution Prohibits Trump From Ever Being President Again
The only question is whether American citizens today can uphold that commitment.
While I agree he should be in the debate, that reason is lame. It is to compare the different candidates answers. Without him its a non-title match.Now I'm doing thisabout DeSantis. He's ranting that Trump should debate, that voters have a right to know the candidates. Um, Ron? Trump was President for 4 years and has been in the media relentlessly ever since. What more do you want to know?
Given the bizarre restriction placed upon him by the judge in Georgia I doubt he could answer even the simplest of obvious exchanges he would surely face. Not to mention he was told by the RNC that by not signing that "loyalty pledge" he would not be allowed to participate.
I'm sure. All the "establishment hacks" need to be gone, especially Romney family members.
.