SCOTUS Issues

Hijinx

Well-Known Member
Two reasons.... first.... a man's surgery can be done in the office.... a woman's surgery requires a hospital surgical team.

Second reason.... men depend on women to take birth control.... which, buy the way, is a mini abortion..... because they're too lazy to put on a condom or they can't find a condom that is small enough for them.... ah ha ha....

Men like you are the ones I would prefer "get fixed" because I don't want that attitude to be reproducing.... ah ha ha....

Oh and out in Arizona... they don't sit around asking where the fireworks will be.... they just load their guns and got outside and shoot..... They may be ignorant out here.... but they are active.... ah ha ha....

:coffee:
Well I am little old to be worrying about tis problem, but I can tell you from experience that wearing a condom is not a very exciting prospect. The damn things do away with everything romantic or good about having sex.
They inhibit the experience to where it isn't hardly worth the effort.
Many men say it's like taking a shower with your socks on, but it's worse than that.
As for the fit, That's no big deal but they do break and often they do come off.

Not much romance in having foreplay and everything ready to go and you have to stop to change the tire.
 

PJay

Well-Known Member
Shame GIF
 

black dog

Free America
Well I am little old to be worrying about tis problem, but I can tell you from experience that wearing a condom is not a very exciting prospect. The damn things do away with everything romantic or good about having sex.
They inhibit the experience to where it isn't hardly worth the effort.
Many men say it's like taking a shower with your socks on, but it's worse than that.
As for the fit, That's no big deal but they do break and often they do come off.

Not much romance in having foreplay and everything ready to go and you have to stop to change the tire.

****ing hypocrite.

they fall off.....
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member




At least one person post-Dobbs has been arrested for making “terroristic threats” towards the Court. The head of DHS told “Face the Nation” yesterday that the “threat environment” towards the Court has risen since the ruling and that the department is prioritizing accordingly:





The scary thing about the Dobbs aftermath is that there’s no “cooldown” period. Most major Court rulings go off like a bomb, where there’s an initial shockwave that passes and then those in the blast radius regain their bearings. The fact that there’s so much sudden legislative activity on abortion makes the end of Roe feel less like a bomb than a major earthquake followed by months of aftershocks. And the more aggressive states are in trying to limit abortion, the more intense the aftershocks get:




Abortion remains legal in Montana thanks to a decision of the state supreme court there but it’s now banned by trigger laws in each of the surrounding states. Can a pregnant woman in Idaho or the Dakotas lawfully travel to Montana for an abortion? It’s unclear. Can an abortion provider in Montana be sued in one of those surrounding states for performing an abortion on a resident of those states? Also unclear. And so:

Planned Parenthood of Montana will no longer provide medication abortions to patients in South Dakota and three other states with “trigger laws,” according to an all-staff email sent by organization President and CEO Martha Fuller Thursday…
Fuller said in the email to comply with the change, all medication abortion patients would be required to provide proof of residency.
“The risks around cross-state provision of services are currently less than clear, with potential for both civil and criminal action for providing abortions in states with bans,” Fuller said in the email.


 

Hijinx

Well-Known Member




At least one person post-Dobbs has been arrested for making “terroristic threats” towards the Court. The head of DHS told “Face the Nation” yesterday that the “threat environment” towards the Court has risen since the ruling and that the department is prioritizing accordingly:





The scary thing about the Dobbs aftermath is that there’s no “cooldown” period. Most major Court rulings go off like a bomb, where there’s an initial shockwave that passes and then those in the blast radius regain their bearings. The fact that there’s so much sudden legislative activity on abortion makes the end of Roe feel less like a bomb than a major earthquake followed by months of aftershocks. And the more aggressive states are in trying to limit abortion, the more intense the aftershocks get:




Abortion remains legal in Montana thanks to a decision of the state supreme court there but it’s now banned by trigger laws in each of the surrounding states. Can a pregnant woman in Idaho or the Dakotas lawfully travel to Montana for an abortion? It’s unclear. Can an abortion provider in Montana be sued in one of those surrounding states for performing an abortion on a resident of those states? Also unclear. And so:





You mean to say that women who are pregnant have to be told they can go somewhere else and get an abortion? Are they really that stupid. I guess they are.
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
“Why do guns have more rights than women?” and similar asinine questions cropped up from some voters after the court struck down New York’s unconstitutionally restrictive gun laws and reversed Roe v. Wade shortly after. Such a question ignores the fact that gun ownership is enshrined in the Bill of Rights while the “right” to kill a child has no constitutional basis (and, further, ignores the fact that no one is trying to ban women). Other leftists know gun ownership is a constitutional right and merely don’t care, as evidenced by the fact that 1 in 5 Americans would like to repeal the Second Amendment.

America’s lack of respect or understanding when it comes to the Constitution is not limited to the Supreme Court or the Second Amendment. According to a poll from the University of Pennsylvania’s Annenberg Public Policy Center in 2017, Americans could not explain some of the fundamental rights granted by the Constitution, let alone basic functions of the U.S. government. More than one-third of participants could not name one right protected in the First Amendment. One-third of those surveyed could not name a single branch of government.

In a study by Pew Research Center in 2018, more than 50 percent of Americans said they feel the Constitution should be interpreted in the context of what it would mean in current times, not in the context of what is originally written. This dangerous viewpoint waters down the foundation the original document provides and makes way for majority opinion to be a bigger influence than law on institutions such as the Supreme Court.



 

SamSpade

Well-Known Member
For your consideration ...


What is really telling here about this supposed 10 year old getting pregnant, is who is the impregnator? That is what should be reported as part of the story as well. Who in the hell had intercourse with a 10 year child to get her pregnant to begin with?
And it's largely surrounding this that I suspect the story is made up. I *get* why an actual ten year old would prefer to keep their identity unknown, but the person who got this child pregnant has committed a heinous crime. Near as I can tell, there's no police record of this.
 

SamSpade

Well-Known Member
by that logic you HAVE NO RIGHT TO BREATH
This is clearly a person who does not understand rights as the Constitution defines them.

It does not "grant" rights. It protects rights you already possess. It does not need to grant you the right to eat food, nor does the lack of its inclusion mean that it is forbidden. It's not the freakin' Bible.

Furthermore - it delegates anything ELSE not enumerated in the Constitution - to the STATES - which is what SCOTUS observed.
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

Fury as left-wing activists ShutDownDC offer $200 bounties for intel on locations of SCOTUS judges who overturned Roe v Wade after targeting Brett Kavanaugh during steakhouse dinner


A left-wing activist group is encouraging users on social media to tweet the location of any of the conservative Supreme Court Justices in exchange for money.

The justices were the majority who voted to overturn the landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade decision last month.

Since then, pro-abortion activists have repeatedly protested outside the justices' homes and, in some cases, confronted them in public.

ShutDownDC is promising a bounty of $50 for anyone who shares a 'confirmed sighting' and a further $200 if they are still in that location half an hour later.

'DC Service Industry Workers... If you see Kavanaugh, Alito, Thomas, Gorsuch, Coney Barrett or Roberts DM us with the details!

'We'll Venmo you $50 for a confirmed sighting and $200 if they're still there 30 mins after your message,' the activist group tweeted on Friday.

A left-wing activist group is encouraging social media users to tweet the location of any of the conservative Supreme Court Justices are spotted out and about
 

Bluecrqbe

Active Member
For your consideration ...


What is really telling here about this supposed 10 year old getting pregnant, is who is the impregnator? That is what should be reported as part of the story as well. Who in the hell had intercourse with a 10 year child to get her pregnant to begin with?
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

Supreme Court Tells Cops To Stop Playing Doctor



The Supreme Court reined in overzealous prosecutors who arrested doctors for treating their patients as individuals rather than conforming to law enforcement's accepted standards. In Ruan v. United States, the Court overturned a decision that would have sent board-certified pain management specialist Xiulu Ruan to prison for 21 years for not conforming to law enforcement's arbitrary and misguided standards. Ruan was not allowed to introduce expert testimony to argue that his pain management decisions were reasonable and based upon clinical experience as well as his patients' individual needs—a so-called good faith defense.

When the public hears opioids, most reflexively think of prescription pain pills. But the term opioids actually refers to a broad category of drugs, including illicit "street" fentanyl, now widely known as the most dangerous of them all. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reported that 77,000 of the 105,000 drug overdose deaths in 2021 are opioid-related, 90 percent of which are due to illicit fentanyl. The rest are mostly due to heroin, cocaine, and methamphetamine.

Although fentanyl alone can easily be lethal, the overwhelming majority of overdose deaths are "polysubstance" deaths: opioids mixed with stimulants, sedatives, and alcohol. To wit, nearly 70 percent of the fentanyl deaths also involved mixtures of cocaine, methamphetamine, and heroin, while the number involving prescription pills was only 16 percent. In 2020, CDC data showed that a mere 7 percent of fatal overdoses involved prescription opioids alone.

Apparently, the Department of Justice didn't get the memo. On June 29, just two days after the Supreme Court's Ruan ruling, the DOJ announced the formation of the New England Prescription Opioid Strike Force, targeting doctors who law officers decide are "overprescribing" opioid pain medications.
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

AOC and Ilhan Omar Busted Pretending to Be Handcuffed During Protest Outside SCOTUS



Reportedly "arrested" for "civil disobedience" — that is, blocking traffic — outside the Supreme Court in protest of the recent Dobbs decision, more than 30 radical Democrats, including several lawmakers, took their antics a bit too far beyond the point of believability.





Here's video of Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) being led away from the front of the Supreme Court by Capitol Police officers with her hands behind her back as if in handcuffs... but then she raised her fist over her head revealing that the "arms-behind-your-back" look was pure choreographed political theater, before going back to pretending to be in cuffs.




Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) also tweeted that she was the victim of...the consequences of her own actions. Despite being "arrested" and walking away — not even escorted by a police officer in the video she shared below — with her hands behind her back, until she too raises a fist in defiance revealing there are no cuffs.

 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

Kavanaugh Neighborhood Under Siege as Nightly Pro-Abortion Protesters Harass Residents








Back in Kavanaugh’s neighborhood, residents bemoan the intrusion on their lives. Resident Lyric Winik:

The vast majority of people here are pro-choice. And the very vast majority of people here think that these protesters have gotten out of control…
They just call us fascists. Nothing about this is healthy. We’ve got kids on this street scared to leave their homes. I do think they’re hurting their own cause

Lamented one concerned dad:

…the protesters had become “more belligerent, using lots of foul language in their chants” and “have left signs with offensive language.” He continued, “I am expressly concerned for the safety of children on our street, including my own. Kids have stopped playing outside due to fear and the consistent presence of protesters.”


One constant slogan bandied about out by protesters: “Keep your religion! Off my vagina!” Nice. Remember, this is a family neighborhood with lots of kids.

The protests continue even as President Joe Biden has yet to condemn the recent assassination attempt on Kavanaugh, and the administration seems to openly encourage harassing Supreme Court judges. “This is what a democracy is,” Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said July 8 when asked about the incident where Kavanaugh was forced from a restaurant by protesters.

The question is: Where are the police? Where is the Justice Department? I can guarantee you that if Roe had not been overturned, and Pro-Lifers were demonstrating outside liberal Justice Elena Kagan’s house, hyper-partisan Attorney General Merrick Garland would go down to the neighborhood ASAP to personally oversee the arrest of protesters.

Why? Because protesting in front of a Supreme Court Justice’s house is illegal. Read Title 18, Section 1507 of the U.S. Code, which was enacted in 1950:

Whoever, with the intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer, in the discharge of his duty, pickets or parades in or near a building housing a court of the United States, or in or near a building or residence occupied or used by such judge, juror, witness, or court officer, or with such intent uses any sound-truck or similar device or resorts to any other demonstration in or near any such building or residence, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both. (Emphasis mine.)
 
Top