For those who didn’t get what I meant when I said this forum is “unserious”
Just a bunch of chit posters and MPDs
She took lessons from Adam Schiff. Tell a lie first, then it casts doubt on whatever follows.As I understand the Secret Service Agents who were the car want to testify to the contrary.
Who knows, maybe they will succeed?I hope this women, Mark Meadows aide Cassidy Hutchinson, is well protected, every nutso Trumper will be after her now
Nawwww, she's more manly.Y’all think I’m Liz Cheney or something?
Just waiting for you to wake up to the monster he is, but you’ll just dig in your heels, you’ll never admit you were wrong.
When this all happened on Jan 6 it was supposedly Antifa…..what say you now?
Daddy T!!You’d say it was doctored, or there was good reason for his behavior, or or or, it don’t matter to the cult, the man is King in your eyes.
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/09/06/bill-clinton-undergoes-heart-surgery-sept-6-2004-242298I have a feeling the portly former president flung more hamberders against the wall today than he shoved down his gullet.
LOL, Engle already testified privately to the committee.
...Geez sweet cheeks..you and irony! I swear...Just a bunch of chit posters and MPDs
Awww how cute, you’re identifying as someone important this morning.LOL, Engle already testified privately to the committee.
"A source tells me..."
But he identifies as a moron daily.Awww how cute, you’re identifying as someone important this morning.
Former President Donald Trump’s lead Secret Service agent is reportedly ready to testify that testimony given by a former White House staffer on Wednesday to the January 6 House select committee is false.
This committee will not allow any testimony that challenges it - period.no one will CHALLENGE it
She's the new Christine Blasey-Ford.Two things I don’t get.
1. I know it’s not a courtroom but - since when is hearsay - repeating a story from someone ELSE - considered evidence. Because of course you could always just question the source rather than get it second hand.
2. So now the source - persons who can give FIRST hand testimony - claim it’s all crap. What was her point? Did she think or did someone tell her - no one will CHALLENGE it? I’ve been ignoring this stuff - I got the general impression that the Dems were never going to permit testimony that hurt their case - but damn. This is seriously stupid.
This committee will not allow any testimony that challenges it - period.