So are they just going to keep making up charges to file against Trump?

CPUSA

Well-Known Member
OMG!!
The more Dan Bongino reads the ACTUAL unsealed indictments, the more I realize SMC79 is a WV meth whore...
These aren't indictments...these are GRIPES!!
and so far, EVERY SINGLE INDICTMENT is a violation of Trump's CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS.

SMC79 have you even read these indictments?
It's obvious you haven't....what an ignorant ghetto queen you are....
 

StmarysCity79

Well-Known Member
OMG!!
The more Dan Bongino reads the ACTUAL unsealed indictments, the more I realize SMC79 is a WV meth whore...
These aren't indictments...these are GRIPES!!
and so far, EVERY SINGLE INDICTMENT is a violation of Trump's CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS.

SMC79 have you even read these indictments?
It's obvious you haven't....what an ignorant ghetto queen you are....


LOLOLOL.

Your first problem is listening to Dan Bongino. Why don't you try reading them yourself without someone else telling you what to think?

Your second is not understanding the constitution and what it means.

Third you don't understand how grand juries work.

I'd love to hear you explain how any of these violate Trumps rights
 

Gilligan

#*! boat!
PREMO Member
LOLOLOL.

Your first problem is listening to Dan Bongino. Why don't you try reading them yourself without someone else telling you what to think?

Your second is not understanding the constitution and what it means.

Third you don't understand how grand juries work.

I'd love to hear you explain how any of these violate Trumps rights
:killingme
:killingme:killingme:killingme:killingme:killingme:killingme
 

SamSpade

Well-Known Member
PREMO Member
It's not for naught that it's said you can indict a ham sandwich. A grand jury can indict on the flimsiest of evidence.

Some of these are charges like, he said such and such on the phone or an email. If that's a crime, we are all doomed -
Or already living in an Orwellian dystopia.
 

Gilligan

#*! boat!
PREMO Member
Some of these are charges like, he said such and such on the phone or an email. If that's a crime, we are all doomed -
Or already living in an Orwellian dystopia.
Orwell, Rand, Huxley and others accurately predicted that dirt-scum like SMC79 would eventually crush free men with their sheer weight. It's going to be an ugly transition though..one that SMC79 will certainly never survive.
 

WingsOfGold

Well-Known Member
LOLOLOL.

Your first problem is listening to Dan Bongino. Why don't you try reading them yourself without someone else telling you what to think?

Your second is not understanding the constitution and what it means.

Third you don't understand how grand juries work.

I'd love to hear you explain how any of these violate Trumps rights
Gag order for a thousand douche.
 

Hessian

Well-Known Member
....you are willing to destroy our democracy....
Um,...you know we do not live in a Democracy right? What part of civics class did you doze through?
You know people screaming & trembling in fear about our "Democracy"....have no clue what our government actually is.
(Its a corporatocracy...an oligarchy of media moguls, lobbyists, and globalists who have almost no connection to the public at all. We have NOT given consent to this ...nor do we like living under laws created to protect the elite, and creating a burdensome amorphous bureaucracy).
 

Bann

Doris Day meets Lady Gaga
PREMO Member
This is such an obvious attempt to tie him up and keep him off the campaign trail and away from the debates I'm surprised we haven't risen up and put all their heads on a pike.

I don't really understand how the disgusting scumbag Democrats can get away with this.
RIGHT???
 

black dog

Free America
Then you must have been very poor at your "job" on these alleged "grand juries"

You should read the constitution and understand it.

Do you believe Pence should have been able to decide who to appoint as president on J6?

If so do you also believe Kamala Harris will have that power next year?
You are ****ing laughable, The girl sitting on my sofa is laughing her ass off at you.
Between the three of us one of us has a Juris Doctor, It ain't me and it certainly ain't you dickweed.
 

Louise

Well-Known Member
No amount of enlightenment could help you at this point.

You want so desperately to believe you haven't been supporting politicaly and financially a criminal for all these years.

Yet you have an you are willing to destroy our democracy rather than admit you were fooled by Trump
Our Country is a Constitutional Republic. Try again.
 

Bann

Doris Day meets Lady Gaga
PREMO Member
So now Arizona is making noises about bringing charges. (maybe they did yesterday - I just heard it today) These people are so mental. They're going to guarantee Trump wins as POTUS in 2024. Each new indictment has increased the amount of money donated to his campaign, and increases his numbers in the polls, too.

It's really gone so far beyond retarded, that it's like *YAWN* another day another set of charges... ohwell. :rolleyes:

Are they really that stup...?? Wait. :killingme
 
Last edited:

StmarysCity79

Well-Known Member
So now Arizona is making noises about bringing charges. (maybe they did yesterday - I just heard it today) These people are so mental. They're going to guarantee Trump wins as POTUS in 2024. Each new indictment has increased the amount of money donated to his campaign, and increases his numbers in the polls, too.

It's really gone so far beyond retarded, that it's like *YAWN* another day another set of charges... ohwell. :rolleyes:

Are they really that stup...?? Wait. :killingme


This from the idiots chanting Lock her Up! If it's so easy to bring charges why didn't they do it to Hillary? or Hunter?

It's almost like it requires evidence.
 

Ken King

A little rusty but not crusty
PREMO Member
This from the idiots chanting Lock her Up! If it's so easy to bring charges why didn't they do it to Hillary? or Hunter?

It's almost like it requires evidence.
Hell, old Jim Comey said it straight up, "Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case."

Do you know why he said it? Pretty freaking simple if you understand the law, which you obviously don't. It is the law that "Except as otherwise expressly provided by law, no person shall be prosecuted, tried, or punished for any offense, not capital, unless the indictment is found or the information is instituted within five years next after such offense shall have been committed." As it was known as early as 2009 that Hillary was using her home-brewed and stored server the clock for bringing charges would have started once it was known. That clock died three years before Trump took office.
 
Last edited:
Top