So are they just going to keep making up charges to file against Trump?

[baldretiree1957]

The more you post...the more ignorant you reveal yourself to be...
The sad part is you're not even smart enough to realize that everyone here sees you as a village idiot

Again, no substance, just insults and name calling.

 

[Kyle]

Again, no substance, just insults and name calling.

 

[baldretiree1957]

When someone is as indoctrinated as that one, there really is no point is trying to show them the actual truth. They call conservatives uneducated and take everything their leaders say at face value without an original thought ever popping into their empty little heads. I take it as a compliment, because they've lost the argument at that point and have nothing to offer except name calling. They are drones and are too simple to realize it, so they say WE are the ones living in a cult.

Just look at SMCou812's or Baldretard's attempted attacks on my posts. They see one person doing something stupid and attach those actions to anyone who doesn't fall into lock step with their nazi leaders and fellow drones. They truly don't ever have an original thought and show it in every ****ing post ad nauseam.

My God, you're boring. Insults and name calling. Never addressing the topic. I'm not sure how I'm attacking your posts because you're not really saying anything. Now, I'll ask again: What Democrats have given testimony to the various Grand Juries? Would you admit that all the evidence has come from people in Trump's orbit?

 

[baldretiree1957]

Do you even know what irony is? Your post makes no sense.

 

[Ken King]

Sorry, but the job of the prosecutor is to GATHER evidence, not to testify.

In the Grand Jury setting the prosecutor lays out his theory on the crimes he believes have been committed to the jury members, explains those laws (as he interprets them) and then provides evidence and witnesses to support his contentions in hope of acquiring an indictment. In other words, the prosecutor "testifies" to the Grand Jury. He doesn't just walk in and throw it all on a table for them to figure it out, he guides them via his testimony.

By the way, what tactics did Smith and Willis use to get testimony? Judge shopping to find jurists? I know I won't get a definitive answer from you, but you have to back up what you say.

Smith's team has coerced at least one lawyer (by threatening his receiving a potential judgeship) and witnesses (threats of prosecution), has successfully (but not necessarily legitimately) eliminated privileges, such as lawyer-client confidentiality and executive privilege that are a hallmark of a fair system of justice. Willis simply indicted just about everyone who spoke and agreed with Trump about problems with the 2020 election to make her RICO attack seem legitimate, without regard to their right to speak freely on the matter.

 

[StmarysCity79]

You were given three, you just chose to ignore them. These prosecutors, that have been overly aggressive in their pursuit of Trump, have been testifying to the Grand Jury in a manner that makes them unfit for their positions. They have stretched laws in an effort to take protected activity and turn it into crimes. They have "judge shopped" to find jurists willing to ignore long standing privileges and forced the testimony from some that have clear privilege. They assuredly have used tactics to intimidate persons with threats of charges for not complying with the expected desires of these prosecutors. They have all forgotten their duty as officers of the court where they "must be scrupulously fair to all witnesses and must do nothing to inflame or otherwise improperly influence the grand jurors." Given that some of them were boldly stating while running for their positions that they would "GET TRUMP" before any investigation is clear evidence of their intended abuse of their office.

Prosecutors do not testify. They are not the ones with knowledge of events. They bring witnesses who testify.

Judge Aileen Cannon is a Trump appointee who has bent over backwards repeatedly to rule in favor of Trump.

None of what you said is backed up by any evidence. All you have to do is a cursory search to find the truth yet you allow Newsmax and Fox to lie to you then you come here and repeat those lies.

 

[StmarysCity79]

In the Grand Jury setting the prosecutor lays out his theory on the crimes he believes have been committed to the jury members, explains those laws (as he interprets them) and then provides evidence and witnesses to support his contentions in hope of acquiring an indictment. In other words, the prosecutor "testifies" to the Grand Jury. He doesn't just walk in and throw it all on a table for them to figure it out, he guides them via his testimony.

Smith's team has coerced at least one lawyer (by threatening his receiving a potential judgeship) and witnesses (threats of prosecution), has successfully (but not necessarily legitimately) eliminated privileges, such as lawyer-client confidentiality and executive privilege that are a hallmark of a fair system of justice. Willis simply indicted just about everyone who spoke and agreed with Trump about problems with the 2020 election to make her RICO attack seem legitimate, without regard to their right to speak freely on the matter.

Those people are called Co-conspirators hence the RICO charges.

Prove that Smith threatened anyones judgeship and that is not just some rumor Fox news told you.

 

[Kyle]

Do you even know what irony is? Your post makes no sense.

It's priceless when you use one MPD to support other.



Please start talking to one of your others and switch back and forth in conversation. That's even better!

 

[Ken King]

Prosecutors do not testify. They are not the ones with knowledge of events. They bring witnesses who testify.

Without knowledge, really? How does that work? Do they have a wheel they spin to determine what the charges will be?

Of course prosecutors testify, they tell the grand jury what they think has happened and work to convince them that it is so.

 

[StmarysCity79]

Without knowledge, really? How does that work? Do they have a wheel they spin to determine what the charges will be?

Of course prosecutors testify, they tell the grand jury what they think has happened and work to convince them that it is so.

No, they allow witnesses to do that. As they do not have first hand knowledge of the events that took place.

 

[PeoplesElbow]

if you are out of the country ....

I'm not sure about old folks in nursing homes, if you sit around in a chair drooling all day long ... should you really be voting

There are many in nursing homes not because of the mind, but because their bodies are failing them. My cousin's grandmother was 94 and sharp as a tack, but her 90lb frame kept breaking down on her, she couldn't hardly see either, definitely could not take care of herself.

 

[baldretiree1957]

In the Grand Jury setting the prosecutor lays out his theory on the crimes he believes have been committed to the jury members, explains those laws (as he interprets them) and then provides evidence and witnesses to support his contentions in hope of acquiring an indictment. In other words, the prosecutor "testifies" to the Grand Jury. He doesn't just walk in and throw it all on a table for them to figure it out, he guides them via his testimony.

Smith's team has coerced at least one lawyer (by threatening his receiving a potential judgeship) and witnesses (threats of

prosecution), has successfully (but not necessarily legitimately) eliminated privileges, such as lawyer-client confidentiality and executive privilege that are a hallmark of a fair system of justice. Willis simply indicted just about everyone who spoke and agreed with Trump about problems with the 2020 election to make her RICO attack seem legitimate, without regard to their right to speak freely on the matter.

Where are you getting this info? Are you personal friends with people on the grand juries? These are what you call baseless accusations.

 

[Ken King]

Where are you getting this info? Are you personal friends with people on the grand juries? These are what you call baseless accusations.

Nope, just have read a few articles about it. They're out there, go look for yourself.

Baseless accusations are what these indictments amount to.

 

[CPUSA]

Again, no substance, just insults and name calling.

Just like ALL of your posts.
Sad little Troll....

 

[CPUSA]

Where are you getting this info? Are you personal friends with people on the grand juries? These are what you call baseless accusations.

Again...No Substance. Just retarded bleating...just like all of you Chitty Marxists....