So are they just going to keep making up charges to file against Trump?

B

baldretiree1957

Member
So it's been about 8 hours since I asked what Democrats have given testimony regarding Trump's many indictments. Not one person has given me any evidence to support your supposition that "disgusting Democrats" are behind all these indictments. What I have gotten is a lot of smart ass answers that have nothing to do with the questions. Most of you seem to think that name calling is a form of communication. I feel sorry for those who can't or won't look at the facts. I also don't understand the anger from some of you members of the cult. You don't have to agree with me, but you do have the responsibility to be civil.
 
PrchJrkr

PrchJrkr

Long Haired Country Boy
Ad Free Experience
Patron
Should I tell him/her/xem/xer or does somebody else want to clue them/they/thex in on it? This is a hoot! :roflmao:
 
Ken King

Ken King

A little rusty but not crusty
PREMO Member
baldretiree1957 said:
So it's been about 8 hours since I asked what Democrats have given testimony regarding Trump's many indictments. Not one person has given me any evidence to support your supposition that "disgusting Democrats" are behind all these indictments. What I have gotten is a lot of smart ass answers that have nothing to do with the questions. Most of you seem to think that name calling is a form of communication. I feel sorry for those who can't or won't look at the facts. I also don't understand the anger from some of you members of the cult. You don't have to agree with me, but you do have the responsibility to be civil.
Click to expand...
You were given three, you just chose to ignore them. These prosecutors, that have been overly aggressive in their pursuit of Trump, have been testifying to the Grand Jury in a manner that makes them unfit for their positions. They have stretched laws in an effort to take protected activity and turn it into crimes. They have "judge shopped" to find jurists willing to ignore long standing privileges and forced the testimony from some that have clear privilege. They assuredly have used tactics to intimidate persons with threats of charges for not complying with the expected desires of these prosecutors. They have all forgotten their duty as officers of the court where they "must be scrupulously fair to all witnesses and must do nothing to inflame or otherwise improperly influence the grand jurors." Given that some of them were boldly stating while running for their positions that they would "GET TRUMP" before any investigation is clear evidence of their intended abuse of their office.
 
Hijinx

Hijinx

Well-Known Member
Ken King said:
You were given three, you just chose to ignore them. These prosecutors, that have been overly aggressive in their pursuit of Trump, have been testifying to the Grand Jury in a manner that makes them unfit for their positions. They have stretched laws in an effort to take protected activity and turn it into crimes. They have "judge shopped" to find jurists willing to ignore long standing privileges and forced the testimony from some that have clear privilege. They assuredly have used tactics to intimidate persons with threats of charges for not complying with the expected desires of these prosecutors. They have all forgotten their duty as officers of the court where they "must be scrupulously fair to all witnesses and must do nothing to inflame or otherwise improperly influence the grand jurors." Given that some of them were boldly stating while running for their positions that they would "GET TRUMP" before any investigation is clear evidence of their intended abuse of their office.
Click to expand...
We should hang them all by the balls.
 
B

baldretiree1957

Member
Ken King said:
You were given three, you just chose to ignore them. These prosecutors, that have been overly aggressive in their pursuit of Trump, have been testifying to the Grand Jury in a manner that makes them unfit for their positions. They have stretched laws in an effort to take protected activity and turn it into crimes. They have "judge shopped" to find jurists willing to ignore long standing privileges and forced the testimony from some that have clear privilege. They assuredly have used tactics to intimidate persons with threats of charges for not complying with the expected desires of these prosecutors. They have all forgotten their duty as officers of the court where they "must be scrupulously fair to all witnesses and must do nothing to inflame or otherwise improperly influence the grand jurors." Given that some of them were boldly stating while running for their positions that theo y would "GET TRUMP" before any investigation is clear evidence of their intended abuse of their office.
Click to expand...
Sorry, but the job of the prosecutor is to GATHER evidence, not to testify. By the way, what tactics did Smith and Willis use to get testimony? Judge shopping to find jurists? I know I won't get a definitive answer from you, but you have to back up what you say.
 
GURPS

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
SamSpade said:
I'm still bewildered by the whole thing - this means that people who use MPDs make a LOT OF THEM in anticipation of using them in the future. We see this a lot - a new, seriously obnoxious "new" poster comes on - profile created years ago but barely if at all ever posted - and voila here they come, sounding exactly as their other nom de plumes and thinking no one will notice.
Click to expand...

Sock Puppets .....

Oct 2018 ... long after the Karma Wars

I dunno :sshrug: Narcissists
 
SamSpade

SamSpade

Well-Known Member
PREMO Member
GURPS said:
Hey Sapidus, Shite in one hand, wish with the other, see which one fills up 1st
Click to expand...
You ever sit in a bar or eatery at work, and there's an annoying chatterbox whom everyone is ignoring - and he pipes up and says "hey is no one answering my question?".

I don't actually have to put him on ignore to skip over anything he says, because it's never going to be interesting.
 
PrchJrkr

PrchJrkr

Long Haired Country Boy
Ad Free Experience
Patron
GURPS said:
Hey Sapidus, Shite in one hand, wish with the other, see which one fills up 1st
Click to expand...
When someone is as indoctrinated as that one, there really is no point is trying to show them the actual truth. They call conservatives uneducated and take everything their leaders say at face value without an original thought ever popping into their empty little heads. I take it as a compliment, because they've lost the argument at that point and have nothing to offer except name calling. They are drones and are too simple to realize it, so they say WE are the ones living in a cult.

Just look at SMCou812's or Baldretard's attempted attacks on my posts. They see one person doing something stupid and attach those actions to anyone who doesn't fall into lock step with their nazi leaders and fellow drones. They truly don't ever have an original thought and show it in every ****ing post ad nauseam.
 
GURPS

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
PrchJrkr said:
They see one person doing something stupid and attach those actions to anyone who doesn't fall into lock step with their nazi leaders and fellow drones
Click to expand...


You are a fascist for supporting Trump .... a book burner if you want to restrict children's access to certain books
 
CPUSA

CPUSA

Well-Known Member
baldretiree1957 said:
Sorry, but the job of the prosecutor is to GATHER evidence, not to testify. By the way, what tactics did Smith and Willis use to get testimony? Judge shopping to find jurists? I know I won't get a definitive answer from you, but you have to back up what you say.
Click to expand...
The more you post...the more ignorant you reveal yourself to be...
The sad part is you're not even smart enough to realize that everyone here sees you as a village idiot
 
SamSpade

SamSpade

Well-Known Member
PREMO Member
PrchJrkr said:
When someone is as indoctrinated as that one, there really is no point is trying to show them the actual truth. They call conservatives uneducated ....
Click to expand...
As I observed in another thread - at the end of the first Guardians of the Galaxy movie, Rocket keeps asking why is it still a crime - if you steal from someone BUT *you* want it MORE. When told it's still stealing ---

Like any myopic idiot, he's convinced that John C Reilly just doesn't understand. Lots of people are unable to understand another viewpoint, because they're locked into THEIRS.

We have a whole panoply of liberal punditry and on Capitol Hill who just don't get why the public isn't convinced that the economy is doing *great*.

And it's because for most people, the "economy" is all about their own personal livelihood. If you're out of work and can't find a job, it's no comfort to hear that unemployment is down. THAT is an example, as I am sure some left leaning nitwit will tell me that it's easy to find a good paying job.

No, I'm talking about stagnant wages and inflation and interest rates. It's not a great economy when my household expenses are up 500-700 bucks a month. When you have to go to savings and retirement to cover unexpected large expenses; when gas is up, utilities like gas and electricity are up, when groceries are through the roof and interest rates are so high, you really can't buy a house - or much else. Unless you're desperate.

When you have lots of money - things like groceries are not even in your wheelhouse - when you don't even drive, the cost of gas isn't a concern. The problem with all of these guys who say "they JUST DON'T UNDERSTAND that the economy is doing GREAT" - it's because they ALL LIVE IN A WORLD where these expenses don't affect them. They are like the Hollywood stars living on huge estates - during the pandemic, telling people who live in tiny flats in New York - just stay home! It's great! Just send out for your groceries! It's Nancy with her luxury freezer packed with JUST expensive ice cream - they purport to stick up for the little guy, but they prove daily *THEY* are the ones who don't get it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top