So are they just going to keep making up charges to file against Trump?

GURPS

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
Ken King said:
Alvin Bragg, Jack Smith, Fani Willis. They are testifying their beliefs to the Grand Jury to obtain indictments. As there has been no trial, yet, these indictments are not evidence of guilt.
Click to expand...


:nono:


No challenging Sapidus with FACTS, only ideology works here
 
PrchJrkr

PrchJrkr

Long Haired Country Boy
Ad Free Experience
Patron
This one's a real winner. It hasn't been paying attention for years and all of a sudden they are a legal expert. It thinks that we fall in line and wholeheartedly support someone because of party affiliation.

Hey @baldretardeedeedee1957, a little (R) behind a person's name means squat, when your cash cow is cornered by wolves.
 
B

baldretiree1957

Member
PrchJrkr said:
This one's a real winner. It hasn't been paying attention for years and all of a sudden they are a legal expert. It thinks that we fall in line and wholeheartedly support someone because of party affiliation.

Hey @baldretardeedeedee1957, a little (R) behind a person's name means squat, when your cash cow is cornered by wolves.
Click to expand...
Wow. When you start with the name calling, you know there's no getting through. No specifics, just vague statements and insults. Begone! I'm done with you.
 
S

StmarysCity79

Well-Known Member
Ken King said:
Alvin Bragg, Jack Smith, Fani Willis. They are testifying their beliefs to the Grand Jury to obtain indictments. As there has been no trial, yet, these indictments are not evidence of guilt.
Click to expand...


No they are not. But they do show that four seperate impartial grand juries heard enough evidence in each case to reccomend going ahead with charging him for almost 100 crimes.
 
PrchJrkr

PrchJrkr

Long Haired Country Boy
Ad Free Experience
Patron
I haven't laughed like this in weeks! These libs really sink their teeth into whatever they're programmed to believe. It's no wonder their leaders have them eating up their BS like a desk sergeant in a donut shop!
 
B

baldretiree1957

Member
PrchJrkr said:
I haven't laughed like this in weeks! These libs really sink their teeth into whatever they're programmed to believe. It's no wonder their leaders have them eating up their BS like a desk sergeant in a donut shop!
Click to expand...
This coming from a cult follower who will probably send his leader money for legal fees even though he proclaims to be a billionaire.
 
PeoplesElbow

PeoplesElbow

Well-Known Member
CPUSA said:
OMG!!
The more Dan Bongino reads the ACTUAL unsealed indictments, the more I realize SMC79 is a WV meth whore...
These aren't indictments...these are GRIPES!!
and so far, EVERY SINGLE INDICTMENT is a violation of Trump's CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS.

SMC79 have you even read these indictments?
It's obvious you haven't....what an ignorant ghetto queen you are....
Click to expand...
You have really insulted meth whores there.
 
SamSpade

SamSpade

Well-Known Member
PREMO Member
GURPS said:
If Republicans were coaching old folks in nursing homes, or picking up homeless and driving them to vote, they would screen bloody murder
Click to expand...
This has been an issue for decades - not just 2020. It's a lot of the reason why the rules keep getting more and more strict for campaign workers outside polling places. But I can remember complaints in the 80's and 90's where poll workers INSIDE the precinct would try to "assist" people having difficulty with the ballots - and the accusations were - they were "helping" them vote for a specific candidate.

How do you CATCH stuff like that? You're not going to have hard evidence - just testimony. There's been a lot of that, but convicting someone? Even if 100% totally guilty - you have to "prove" it - and that's not going to happen.

One of the reasons I'm not for "ballot harvesting" because to my knowledge, there's really nothing you can do if workers inside the nursing home decide to "help" people vote and the mass of ballots gets taken out the door.

I don't see how anyone can see our hodgepodge mess of voting systems and NOT see they're totally ripe for abuse. Every time the Republicans want to tighten security on voting, they're assailed as wanting to restrict access to voting. Dems are FINE with it, because the fraud helps THEM.

As I have said - they need to be threatened with the same crap done against them. If this same kind of shenanigans helped REPUBLICANS, they'd look at it closer.
 
SamSpade

SamSpade

Well-Known Member
PREMO Member
Kyle said:
Breaking out the really old MPDs I see. :yay:
Click to expand...
Noticed that, huh? Nothing for three years - and then a ton in one thread.

I'm still bewildered by the whole thing - this means that people who use MPDs make a LOT OF THEM in anticipation of using them in the future. We see this a lot - a new, seriously obnoxious "new" poster comes on - profile created years ago but barely if at all ever posted - and voila here they come, sounding exactly as their other nom de plumes and thinking no one will notice.

That kind of idiocy isn't what bewilders me - it's that anyone would bother to return under another guise - REPEATEDLY. I am not kidding, but it sounds like someone who is mentally unhinged. It's like Plankton and his schemes for the Crabby Patty formula - they're totally transparent, even the kids watching laugh and point at it - but he thinks he's being clever.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top