Stormy Fiasco

StmarysCity79

Well-Known Member
LOL. Who's sleepy now?

Screen Shot 2024-04-15 at 1.41.40 PM.png
 

phreddyp

Well-Known Member
why should I waste my time
You've already dodged the question. Why would I think you won't do it again?
Mainly because YOU are not really capable of thinking on your own, parroting is your mode of discussion.

Now go back and have someone read to you about how lucky I am, and how I appreciate it. It's all right there in the post. You know they do have senior reading classes.
 

StmarysCity79

Well-Known Member
OMG :roflmao: Could you be a bigger cultbot?? :lmao:

No wonder you spout the stupid sh*t you do. This is the garbage you listen to. Try a real news site instead of a Trump hater propaganda brainwash network.

EDUCATE YOURSELF!!

:roflmao:


Yawn. It's always the same with you.

Any criticism of Trump must be "Deep state "or have "DTS" or "Trump hater network."

Is he really the epitome of perfection in your eyes? How sad your expectations of men are.

Isn't obvious Trump is a tool and a blathering idiot?
 

WingsOfGold

Well-Known Member
How exactly is she getting rich from the case?

Use your own words.
In a letter to Merchan, Trump's attorneys said there's an "unacceptable risk" that Merchan's daughter’s employment with the political firm Authentic Campaigns, which worked with Joe Biden’s campaign in 2020, will influence her father's conduct.

"Your Honor’s daughter is an executive and partner at Authentic Campaigns, Inc. As recently as February and March 2024, Authentic has used social media to market its connections to President Biden and Vice President Harris while deriding President Trump," they wrote Monday in the letter, which was made public Tuesday.

The letter also says Merchan “appears to have made extrajudicial comments about the case,” citing comments he made last month to The Associated Press, and it argues that he "used the Office of Court Administration" to issue a statement about an X account that was associated with his daughter.

If I used MY words you would want a link idiot. That being said go phuck yourself Tubby.
 

StmarysCity79

Well-Known Member
In a letter to Merchan, Trump's attorneys said there's an "unacceptable risk" that Merchan's daughter’s employment with the political firm Authentic Campaigns, which worked with Joe Biden’s campaign in 2020, will influence her father's conduct.

"Your Honor’s daughter is an executive and partner at Authentic Campaigns, Inc. As recently as February and March 2024, Authentic has used social media to market its connections to President Biden and Vice President Harris while deriding President Trump," they wrote Monday in the letter, which was made public Tuesday.

The letter also says Merchan “appears to have made extrajudicial comments about the case,” citing comments he made last month to The Associated Press, and it argues that he "used the Office of Court Administration" to issue a statement about an X account that was associated with his daughter.

If I used MY words you would want a link idiot. That being said go phuck yourself Tubby.


LOLOLOL.

So you use Trumps attorneys words which you believe will be unbiased?

And then you quote the part where the attorney complained about the Judge objecting to Trump's post that used a fake twitter post that was attributed to his daughter but wasn't actually hers?


You are even stupider than i originally thought and it's clear you just repeat stupidity without even reading it to see if it makes any logical sense

Trump also peddled the discredited claimed that Loren Merchan posted an incendiary image of the former president behind bars on her social media account – an account that the court said didn’t even belong to her.
But court officials in New York said in a statement that the account with the Trump-in-jail photo did not belong to Loren Merchan and was, in fact, an imposter trying to frame her.

“The X, formerly Twitter, account being attributed to Judge Merchan’s daughter no longer belongs to her since she deleted it approximately a year ago,” court spokesman Al Baker said last week. “It is not linked to her email address, nor has she posted under that screen name since she deleted the account. Rather, it represents the reconstitution, last April, and manipulation of an account she long ago abandoned.”

A forensic review published by The Spectator, a conservative-leaning British outlet, bolstered Baker’s denial and undercut Trump’s attempt to tie the tweets to Merchan


 

vraiblonde

Board Mommy
PREMO Member
Patron
LOLOLOL.

So you use Trumps attorneys words which you believe will be unbiased?

And then you quote the part where the attorney complained about the Judge objecting to Trump's post that used a fake twitter post that was attributed to his daughter but wasn't actually hers?


You are even stupider than i originally thought and it's clear you just repeat stupidity without even reading it to see if it makes any logical sense

Trump also peddled the discredited claimed that Loren Merchan posted an incendiary image of the former president behind bars on her social media account – an account that the court said didn’t even belong to her.
But court officials in New York said in a statement that the account with the Trump-in-jail photo did not belong to Loren Merchan and was, in fact, an imposter trying to frame her.

“The X, formerly Twitter, account being attributed to Judge Merchan’s daughter no longer belongs to her since she deleted it approximately a year ago,” court spokesman Al Baker said last week. “It is not linked to her email address, nor has she posted under that screen name since she deleted the account. Rather, it represents the reconstitution, last April, and manipulation of an account she long ago abandoned.”

A forensic review published by The Spectator, a conservative-leaning British outlet, bolstered Baker’s denial and undercut Trump’s attempt to tie the tweets to Merchan



...says the cultbot who then cites CNN as a source of (mis)information......

No serious informed person uses CNN as a source. Or MSNBC. Or Vox or any of those other cultblogs you people worship as the gospel. The first clue that you don't know WTF you're talking about is you cite some bullshit propaganda outlet as "proof".
 

StmarysCity79

Well-Known Member
...says the cultbot who then cites CNN as a source of (mis)information......

No serious informed person uses CNN as a source. Or MSNBC. Or Vox or any of those other cultblogs you people worship as the gospel. The first clue that you don't know WTF you're talking about is you cite some bullshit propaganda outlet as "proof".

The quotes from the article are from courtroom officials and a forensic review by a Conservative leaning Newspaper you neanderthal.

And again you have failed to post anything that backs up any of the crap you spew.

God it's like talking to a mentally challenged animal who goes from screaming about committing violence to licking its own genitals.
 

vraiblonde

Board Mommy
PREMO Member
Patron
The quotes from the article are from courtroom officials and a forensic review by a Conservative leaning Newspaper you neanderthal.

Prove it. CNN *says* those are quotes, but they lie all the time. Prove those people said what CNN says they said. And then you can prove that they're telling the truth.

Prove your claims or STFU. Isn't that what you demand of everyone else?
 

StmarysCity79

Well-Known Member
Prove it. CNN *says* those are quotes, but they lie all the time. Prove those people said what CNN says they said. And then you can prove that they're telling the truth.

Prove your claims or STFU. Isn't that what you demand of everyone else?


So now you ask me for proof despite never being willing to post any of your own?

The article i quoted already links to the forensic account which shows the Twitter account has nothing to do with the daughter. And the statement from the court officials is public record and linked below

How can you continue to be this dumb?

Merchan's decision in August refusing to step aside noted that he had sought guidance from the state courts system’s Advisory Committee on Judicial Ethics over his daughter's employment. The committee found the DA's case “does not involve either the judge’s relative or the relative’s business, whether directly or indirectly. They are not parties or likely witnesses in the matter, and none of the parties or counsel before the judge are clients in the business. We see nothing in the inquiry to suggest that the outcome of the case could have any effect on the judge’s relative, the relative’s business, or any of their interests.”


Never the less.

See below. I doubt you will understand most of the language as it is not meant for meant 6 year olds.

 

vraiblonde

Board Mommy
PREMO Member
Patron
So now you ask me for proof despite never being willing to post any of your own?

The article i quoted already links to the forensic account which shows the Twitter account has nothing to do with the daughter. And the statement from the court officials is public record and linked below

How can you continue to be this dumb?

Merchan's decision in August refusing to step aside noted that he had sought guidance from the state courts system’s Advisory Committee on Judicial Ethics over his daughter's employment. The committee found the DA's case “does not involve either the judge’s relative or the relative’s business, whether directly or indirectly. They are not parties or likely witnesses in the matter, and none of the parties or counsel before the judge are clients in the business. We see nothing in the inquiry to suggest that the outcome of the case could have any effect on the judge’s relative, the relative’s business, or any of their interests.”


Never the less.

See below. I doubt you will understand most of the language as it is not meant for meant 6 year olds.


Prove it.

"My cult leaders say so" isn't proof - that's your brainwashing. I'm not brainwashed or part of your cult, so prove your claims.
 

vraiblonde

Board Mommy
PREMO Member
Patron
Too many news outlets either parrot each other or distort what is said - all too often.
The latest one is the "bloodbath" one, but they've been doing it for years.

Democrats believe whatever their cult masters tell them to believe. When you ask for proof they cite their cult leaders' propaganda.

The MSM and various "experts" have been lying about Trump since he first announced his candidacy and dumbshits like SMC gobble it up like the good little bots they are.
 

StmarysCity79

Well-Known Member
Prove it.

"My cult leaders say so" isn't proof - that's your brainwashing. I'm not brainwashed or part of your cult, so prove your claims.

So the Forensic accounting from the 3rd party hired by the conservative newspaper isn't enough for you?

Nor is the link i posted which you stupidly must believe is the judges opinion?

You must not have read the advisory committees account which he solicited to avoid any hint of bias

So now that you've rejected any and all proof beside Trump's orange syphillis crusted mouth where is your proof?
 
Last edited:

StmarysCity79

Well-Known Member
Democrats believe whatever their cult masters tell them to believe. When you ask for proof they cite their cult leaders' propaganda.

The MSM and various "experts" have been lying about Trump since he first announced his candidacy and dumbshits like SMC gobble it up like the good little bots they are.

"Trump is the one true messiah, has never lied or exaggerated" " I place all my blind faith in a thrice divorced man with multiple baby mamas who sells signed copies of the bible from his crumbling club house"

Grab em by the Puss*!

Truly a sucker born every minute.
 
Last edited:
Top