Perhaps you need a remedial reading course. ItsBob said nothing about the constitutional requirements. He said:
So whatever voices are going on in your head, that's your problem. Just because you can't read doesn't mean nobody can.
Swallow anything you have in your mouth before clicking
- Thread starter vraiblonde
- Start date
Perhaps you need a remedial reading course. ItsBob said nothing about the constitutional requirements. He said:
So whatever voices are going on in your head, that's your problem. Just because you can't read doesn't mean nobody can.
HemiHauler
Well-Known Member
Oh, I am aware of what was written.
When it comes to "qualifications", that is very specifically defined in the Constitution.
Perhaps he really meant meant "fitness" (up to the voters to decide). Perhaps he really meant "suitability" (up to the voters to decide).
But he used a form of the word "qualified"; that is in fact defined in our Constitution and AOC is in fact "qualified".
Take the L and go slap another gelcoat on your gnarly-ass booger hooks.
Bye.
See ya soon!
Toxick
Splat
if Newsome is in the top 5, then... well .... I would say I'd give up hope on humanity, but I gave up on that years ago
People, people, people. AOC will be 35 in October 2024, so she will in fact be 35 before the election.
So for the first time her age will be greater than her IQ.
Well, I wouldn't go that far. I wonder if her favorite history figures are King Phillip IV of France and Pope Clement V?
WingsOfGold
Well-Known Member
Even the 90 IQers would puke!
This obsession with AOC's age is creepy.
BOP
Well-Known Member
You know that old saying "even a stopped clock is right, twice a day"?Why are you fighting so desperately to be right about something that has absolutely no possibility of happening?
SpermHauler is still going for his first W.
BOP
Well-Known Member
Permavirgin is the name of my new band.
HemiHauler
Well-Known Member
Even creepier is the obsession with willful ignorance of things in the written word right in front of you put on display daily by you and your ilk.
On one hand I admire your tenacity; on the other hand the way you dig in when you're obviously and publicly wrong is some mental chit.
Bob said "qualified". YOU brought up constitutional requirements, not him.
qualification
kwŏl″ə-fĭ-kā′shən
noun
The act of qualifying or the condition of being qualified.
A quality, ability, or accomplishment that makes a person suitable for a particular position or task.
A condition or circumstance that must be met or complied with.
He's just another creepy stalker. I attract them for some reason.
HemiHauler
Well-Known Member
Yup.
Because when one speaks about "QUALIFICATIONS" for being POTUS that is defined in the US Constitution. No other meaning applies.
BOP
Well-Known Member
HemiHauler
Well-Known Member
Hey Pookie?
There's always a quote from you.
Meanwhile, back at the DNC...
Such a unified party. Democratic National Committee Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz will not speak at or preside over the party's convention this week, a decision reached by party officials Saturday after emails surfaced that raised questions about the committee's impartiality during the...
forums.somd.com
Is it possible for you to even pretend you have a modicum of ideological consistency?
Bare-ya-cuda
Well-Known Member
What you are referring to is eligibility not qualifications. Why would a major part nominate and campaign someone who wasn’t eligible for that office as defined in the constitution?
Ask Barry Soetoro.