Meanwhile, back at the DNC...

[vraiblonde]

Such a unified party.

Democratic National Committee Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz will not speak at or preside over the party's convention this week, a decision reached by party officials Saturday after emails surfaced that raised questions about the committee's impartiality during the Democratic primary.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/22/politics/dnc-wikileaks-emails/

Because, as we all knew, that fix was in. And you trying to tell me Shrillary didn't know all about it, and didn't in fact orchestrate it?

Oh, and here's your lying bitch of a Baltimore mayor: But Baltimore mayor and DNC Secretary Stephanie Rawlings-Blake denied any suggestion that Clinton's camp was treated more favorably by the committee.

But forget that. Let's mock Trump some more for calling the system rigged. Let's titter about how fractured the GOP is. Haw haw haw!

 

[Hijinx]

Such a unified party.

Democratic National Committee Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz will not speak at or preside over the party's convention this week, a decision reached by party officials Saturday after emails surfaced that raised questions about the committee's impartiality during the Democratic primary.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/22/politics/dnc-wikileaks-emails/

Because, as we all knew, that fix was in. And you trying to tell me Shrillary didn't know all about it, and didn't in fact orchestrate it?

Oh, and here's your lying bitch of a Baltimore mayor: But Baltimore mayor and DNC Secretary Stephanie Rawlings-Blake denied any suggestion that Clinton's camp was treated more favorably by the committee.

But forget that. Let's mock Trump some more for calling the system rigged. Let's titter about how fractured the GOP is. Haw haw haw!

Never understood how Washerwoman Schultz ever got to be Chairperson of the Democrat party.
She is a goof, and it is pretty obvious.
I have watched this highjacked email thing from the party for a while and all I see is outrage over it's discovery.
I see no outrage over favoring Hillary and tossing bernie to the wolves. only outrage that it got found out.

Certainly the Primary was rigged, but is the General election rigged also.
Does the part have enough unAmerican traitors to change the poll count?

It's a question that needs answering.

 

[Bann]

Such a unified party.

Democratic National Committee Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz will not speak at or preside over the party's convention this week, a decision reached by party officials Saturday after emails surfaced that raised questions about the committee's impartiality during the Democratic primary.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/22/politics/dnc-wikileaks-emails/

Because, as we all knew, that fix was in. And you trying to tell me Shrillary didn't know all about it, and didn't in fact orchestrate it?

Oh, and here's your lying bitch of a Baltimore mayor: But Baltimore mayor and DNC Secretary Stephanie Rawlings-Blake denied any suggestion that Clinton's camp was treated more favorably by the committee.

But forget that. Let's mock Trump some more for calling the system rigged. Let's titter about how fractured the GOP is. Haw haw haw!

Teehee! Aren't they all totes adorb?! The DNC is shaping up to be must see TV, as such darn cuteness can't be missed.

 

[tommyjo]

Such a unified party.

Democratic National Committee Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz will not speak at or preside over the party's convention this week, a decision reached by party officials Saturday after emails surfaced that raised questions about the committee's impartiality during the Democratic primary.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/22/politics/dnc-wikileaks-emails/

Because, as we all knew, that fix was in. And you trying to tell me Shrillary didn't know all about it, and didn't in fact orchestrate it?

Oh, and here's your lying bitch of a Baltimore mayor: But Baltimore mayor and DNC Secretary Stephanie Rawlings-Blake denied any suggestion that Clinton's camp was treated more favorably by the committee.

But forget that. Let's mock Trump some more for calling the system rigged. Let's titter about how fractured the GOP is. Haw haw haw!

Just to make sure you clearly understand the difference...nothing in your post and nothing you or Bann or anyone has ever posted about Mr. Trump has included a rational point that shows Mr. Trump is qualified to be President of the United States. Nothing. And there never will be for the plain and simple fact is that Mr. Trump is not qualified, on any level, to be President of the United States of America.

This is not a question of ideology...it is a question of competence and ability. Mr. Trump doesn't possess either.

Ms. Clinton is qualified and so is Mr. Johnson.

The GOP is a complete mess...thanks to Mr. Trump. If you weren't so blind, you would see that.

Wonder if any of you understand the meaning of the WaPo's editorial today? Here's the ending:

The Republican Party has moved the lunatic fringe onto center stage, with discourse that renders impossible the kind of substantive debate upon which any civil democracy depends.

Most responsible Republican leaders know all this to be true; that is why Mr. Trump had to rely so heavily on testimonials by relatives and employees during this week’s Republican convention. With one exception (Bob Dole), the living Republican presidents and presidential nominees of the past three decades all stayed away. But most current officeholders, even those who declared Mr. Trump to be an unthinkable choice only months ago, have lost the courage to speak out.

The party’s failure of judgment leaves the nation’s future where it belongs, in the hands of voters. Many Americans do not like either candidate this year . We have criticized the presumptive Democratic nominee, Hillary Clinton, in the past and will do so again when warranted. But we do not believe that she (or the Libertarian and Green party candidates, for that matter) represents a threat to the Constitution. Mr. Trump is a unique and present danger.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...d823cc-4f4f-11e6-aa14-e0c1087f7583_story.html

In your entire lifetime, do you recall a major news outlet publishing something like that leading up to a Presidential election?

 

[This_person]

Ms. Clinton is qualified

Defend (I'm sure you can't, but please try)

 

[vraiblonde]

In your entire lifetime, do you recall a major news outlet publishing something like that leading up to a Presidential election?

Well, yes. The WashPo publishes dire hysterical warnings against the Republican candidate every single election. So do most of the other liberal media outlets.

Every. Single. Election.

And I note you have nothing to say about the actual, you know, topic of this thread. Just "BWAAACK! Donald Trump is Hitler! BWAAAACK!"

 

[Bann]

the plain and simple fact is that Mr. Trump is not qualified, on any level, to be President of the United States of America.

This is not a question of ideology...it is a question of competence and ability. Mr. Trump doesn't possess either.

Okay. Let's try this one.more.time.

The US Constitution states the "Qualifcations to be POTUS" are thus:

Section 1 of Article Two of the United States Constitution sets forth the eligibility requirements for serving as president of the United States:

No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

See also: Natural-born citizen and President of the United States

By the time of their inauguration, the President and Vice President must be:

natural born citizens
at least 35 years old
inhabitants of the United States for at least fourteen years.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artic...stitution#Clause_5:_Qualifications_for_office

So, yes - yes Donald Trump - IS qualified to be POTUS.
You don't have to like him. You don't have to agree with his brand of politics and you don't have to agree that he should be the GOP nominee. But HE IS QUALIFIED. The US Constitution says so.

 

[vraiblonde]

Okay. Let's try this one.more.time.

The US Constitution states the "Qualifcations to be POTUS" are thus:


So, yes - yes Donald Trump - IS qualified to be POTUS.
You don't have to like him. You don't have to agree with his brand of politics and you don't have to agree that he should be the GOP nominee. But HE IS QUALIFIED. The US Constitution says so.

See, and I just don't think you should have to explain that, at least not more than once. But note that it has to be explained over and over and over. And over and over. And STILL they come back with, "... ... BWAAACK! Donald Trump isn't qualified! BWAAACK!!!"

 

[Bann]

This is not a question of ideology...it is a question of competence and ability. Mr. Trump doesn't possess either.

Yes, it IS a question of ideology. Do you even understand what you write?

Simple Definition of ideology

: the set of ideas and beliefs of a group or political party
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/ideology

You also state that Donald Trump in not in possession of competence nor ability. That is positively laughable. The man is a multi-billionaire.


A BILLIONAIRE multiple times over! Do you think he got to be a multi-billionaire from being incompetent and unable?

YOU disagree with Trump's ideology - and that's fine. But he is qualified, competent and able to be POTUS. In fact, he was elected to run for that office by the most votes (that's lots and lots and lots) in GOP primary history.

Now, go away and let the grown ups talk. :headpat:

 

[mAlice]

See, and I just don't think you should have to explain that, at least not more than once. But note that it has to be explained over and over and over. And over and over. And STILL they come back with, "... ... BWAAACK! Donald Trump isn't qualified! BWAAACK!!!"

None are so blind as those who will not see.

 

[SamSpade]

Well, yes. The WashPo publishes dire hysterical warnings against the Republican candidate every single election. So do most of the other liberal media outlets.

Every. Single. Election.

And I note you have nothing to say about the actual, you know, topic of this thread. Just "BWAAACK! Donald Trump is Hitler! BWAAAACK!"

The OTHER liberal tactic besides the I'm smarter than you one - change the subject. THIS time, *completely* change the subject.
And it sickens me that they do this at all - the DNC should not have had even the slightest hand in changing the outcome or assisting one candidate.
It *IS* fixed.

Also I am perplexed at the repeated expression of who is "qualified". There are only a very small number of criterion laid out in the Constitution for "qualified".
Frankly, *I* even meet them all. What they MEAN to say is, do they possess the characteristics that would make them a good President.
And that's always a matter of opinion.

 

[Hijinx]

Just to make sure you clearly understand the difference...nothing in your post and nothing you or Blue Boy or NH boy or anyone has ever posted about Mrs. Clinton has included a rational point that shows Mrs. Clinton is qualified to be President of the United States. Nothing. And there never will be for the plain and simple fact is that Mrs. Clinton is not qualified, on any level, to be President of the United States of America.

This is not a question of ideology...it is a question of competence and ability. Mrs. Clinton doesn't possess either.

If Mrs. Clinton is qualified so was Al Capone or Pierre Petain..

The Dems are a complete mess...thanks to Mrs. Clinton. If you weren't so blind, you would see that.
The Democrats are running a woman even their own FBI director stated was careless with Secrets
If Scandals stuck out of her body she would resemble a porcupine.
Being First Excuser to a President who couldn't keep his dick in his pants does not qualify anyone to be President.
Her perfunctory performance in the Senate was no qualification.
And her performance as S.O.S. where she screwed up something as simple as a reset button, got 4 people killed and possibly gave away State secrets through her emails By all means by Gawd does not qualify her.


Wonder if you understand the meaning of the WaPo's editorial today? Here's the ending:


It is not at all unusual to see the Washington Post print liberal Democrats talking points It's what they do.

The Washington Post is the propaganda branch of the DNC I would pay more attention to Pee Wee Herman's web site than theirs.
And Yes For the Washington Post that is about normal.

I fixed that mess for you, You can thank me later, perhaps after Mr. Trump is elected .

 

[Hijinx]

The OTHER liberal tactic besides the I'm smarter than you one - change the subject. THIS time, *completely* change the subject.
And it sickens me that they do this at all - the DNC should not have had even the slightest hand in changing the outcome or assisting one candidate.
It *IS* fixed.

Also I am perplexed at the repeated expression of who is "qualified". There are only a very small number of criterion laid out in the Constitution for "qualified".
Frankly, *I* even meet them all. What they MEAN to say is, do they possess the characteristics that would make them a good President.
And that's always a matter of opinion.

I hate to say all democrats do not recognize quality characteristics of candidates,because I am sure a lot of them have looked at Hillary's character and will vote against her, but for those who do not I suspect their own character is getting in the way of this recognition.

 

[vraiblonde]

What they MEAN to say is, do they possess the characteristics that would make them a good President.

But that's not what they actually say because they've never had an original thought in their lives. All they know how to do is parrot what someone on the TV says. And the TV heads say stupid things like that because they know their parrot minions will repeat it like drones.

 

[GURPS]

IMHO - anyone who 'wants' to be president, should not be allowed within the confines of DC EVER

 

[stgislander]

Dear lord TJ, your life must really suck.

 

[glhs837]

I wonder if there is an WAPO linkages to be found in the leaked DNC emails.....

 

[littlelady]

It is in all Americans' faces, now, that our gov is corrupt on both sides. I think we are doomed, unless there is an awakening. I can't even listen to both sides, anymore. If I watch tv at all these days, it is FoodNetwork. At least, I learn something I don't already know.

 

[Hijinx]

It is in all Americans' faces, now, that our gov is corrupt on both sides. I think we are doomed, unless there is an awakening. I can't even listen to both sides, anymore. If I watch tv at all these days, it is FoodNetwork. At least, I learn something I don't already know.

Yeah, but you keep getting fatter.

 

[This_person]

Yeah, but you keep getting fatter.

NO ONE is getting fat except Momma Cass.