The Child Support injustice.

[VoteJP]

The Contrarian.

Jimmy, I think rather than running for a government position you should attempt to get on comedy central. You really do make me and a lot of others laugh bunches. You could become a hit and make bunches of money just being yourself/

I see the gov position as a funny position too.

And I really can make anyone laugh in real life, and I like to do it.

Some how on these Boards people fail to see my humor - but it is always there.

And that does not mean me being dishonest or deceptive or untrue, as I say the very best of all humor is in the real and true things.

I can be very facetious and truthful at the same time, and it is great fun.

 

[VoteJP]

The Contrarian.

I can't help that the facts are what they are. :shrug: I can't help that 2+3=/=84,

The equation does not add up and instead you are forcing the 2+3 to equal 84 when it does not.

nor can I help that some parents do act selfishly and desert their kids.

You are not to be the Parenting Police, and the gov is not to be the Parenting Police, and the children are not harmed by the squabbles of their own parents.

It is the Parenting Policing that hurts the parents and hurts the children because the laws are immoral and wrong.

And being a selfish person or a selfish parent is not to be a crime especially when the children do have everything they need to overflowing as is the case.

Real parenting is complicated and challenging, while the Parenting Policing is excessively abusive.

I do wonder why when you call someone "dishonest" and say they are saying things that are "extremely untrue" that is considered a fair 'challenge', but when others say the same things of your beliefs you immediately dismiss then insult them. Seems a bit hypocritical. Okay, A LOT hypocritical.

I do not see why you can not understand that and it seems super simple to me, so I will try again.

When I say some thing said is not true then that is NOT calling the person as dishonest. People make mistakes and we are some times honestly wrong and I even believe in respecting lies and liars when ever I can.

And when I say or post some thing that I believe to be correct and true to the best of my understanding, then I defend my points accordingly.

If I tell others that their words are not correct or not true then they are free and invited to defend their points too.

I certainly do not see anything hypocritical in telling some one else that they are wrong and saying myself as correct at the exact same time.

Thanks again for not responding to my challenge; you further prove that you can not adequately defend your case.

My understanding of a challenge is that one may accept it or reject the challenge, and I went back to read yours again and I see nothing for me give a response to.

When it is your own feelings and your position then that is fine with me even if you have different views from my own.

And democracy is not about everyone agreeing with each other or even all agreeing with the winners or the leaders, because democracy means the majority ruling over the minority votes and I only need one (1) vote more than the opposition.

If I win the election then I will be your Governor whether you like it or not.

I thought you no longer consumed alcohol. Thanks for admitting otherwise.

I still do not drink very often, and I do not like to ever drink alone.

The "Hole in the Wall" is the only place that I know of that has Harwood Whiskey at the Bar, and I do see it as the best Whiskey.

 

[Highlander]

The equation does not add up and instead you are forcing the 2+3 to equal 84 when it does not.


You are not to be the Parenting Police, and the gov is not to be the Parenting Police, and the children are not harmed by the squabbles of their own parents.

It is the Parenting Policing that hurts the parents and hurts the children because the laws are immoral and wrong.

And being a selfish person or a selfish parent is not to be a crime especially when the children do have everything they need to overflowing as is the case.

Real parenting is complicated and challenging, while the Parenting Policing is excessively abusive.


I do not see why you can not understand that and it seems super simple to me, so I will try again.

When I say some thing said is not true then that is NOT calling the person as dishonest. People make mistakes and we are some times honestly wrong and I even believe in respecting lies and liars when ever I can.

And when I say or post some thing that I believe to be correct and true to the best of my understanding, then I defend my points accordingly.

If I tell others that their words are not correct or not true then they are free and invited to defend their points too.

I certainly do not see anything hypocritical in telling some one else that they are wrong and saying myself as correct at the exact same time.


My understanding of a challenge is that one may accept it or reject the challenge, and I went back to read yours again and I see nothing for me give a response to.

When it is your own feelings and your position then that is fine with me even if you have different views from my own.

And democracy is not about everyone agreeing with each other or even all agreeing with the winners or the leaders, because democracy means the majority ruling over the minority votes and I only need one (1) vote more than the opposition.

If I win the election then I will be your Governor whether you like it or not.


I still do not drink very often, and I do not like to ever drink alone.

The "Hole in the Wall" is the only place that I know of that has Harwood Whiskey at the Bar, and I do see it as the best Whiskey.

Wow, JPC...You're getting lots of attention. I'll be you are eating this up.

 

[hvp05]

And when I say or post some thing that I believe to be correct and true to the best of my understanding, then I defend my points accordingly.

You did not do that on that last 'challenge'. You totally ran away from defending it.

I certainly do not see anything hypocritical in telling some one else that they are wrong and saying myself as correct at the exact same time.

You are hypocritical when you feel you can criticize others but they can not criticize you, or at least you do not listen to others' criticisms.

If I win the election then I will be your Governor whether you like it or not.

You won't be my governor. (Fortunately, you will lose so no one will have to fear being governed by you.)

 

[Highlander]

You did not do that on that last 'challenge'. You totally ran away from defending it.

You are hypocritical when you feel you can criticize others but they can not criticize you, or at least you do not listen to others' criticisms.

You won't be my governor. (Fortunately, you will lose so no one will have to fear being governed by you.)

It just strikes me as so funny that he actually believes he will be the Governor. He's barely qualified to be a Wal-Mart Greeter, much less a Governor. Oh, and I wouldn't let him try to put a smley face sticker on my kids. That would be creepy. I guess we should just let him enjoy his fantacy for a little while. I'm just dying to see what he runs for in 2012.

 

[hvp05]

I wouldn't let him try to put a smley face sticker on my kids. That would be creepy.

I think he'll be too busy cavorting with his welfare/druggy/hooker friends to bother trying to swoon any of the average folks - the ones who he would need to rely on to win anything.

I'm just dying to see what he runs for in 2012.

Someone already asked if he would go for the White House next. He said no because he wants to allow The One to serve his full 8... but maybe in 2016. Imagine how deranged he'll be by then.

 

[CentralMD]

Thanks to MarkP over on the The Sun forum for the laugh:

“Isn't it amazing the lengths some people go to to justify not wanting to support the children they helped make? I heard about one that really is the King Of All Losers, this guy is amazing.”

“He spends days on the Internet looking for cases of child support abuse to support his cause.”
“He has been to court several times for refusing to support his children.”
“He blames murder of people the murderer never met and terrorism on not having child custody and having to pay child support.”
“He is running for a government office for the entire purpose of eliminating child support.”
“He won't take donations for his self financed "campaign" because he will lose his SSDI.”

“He is one helluva man ladies you should all fight to see who gets him.”

Custody of Children laws. - Page 2 - Baltimore Sun talk forum


Come on girls, don’t be shy.

 

[Bronwyn]

At least we aren't the only ones that have to hear his drivel.

 

[Highlander]

Thanks to MarkP over on the The Sun forum for the laugh:

“Isn't it amazing the lengths some people go to to justify not wanting to support the children they helped make? I heard about one that really is the King Of All Losers, this guy is amazing.”

“He spends days on the Internet looking for cases of child support abuse to support his cause.”
“He has been to court several times for refusing to support his children.”
“He blames murder of people the murderer never met and terrorism on not having child custody and having to pay child support.”
“He is running for a government office for the entire purpose of eliminating child support.”
“He won't take donations for his self financed "campaign" because he will lose his SSDI.”

“He is one helluva man ladies you should all fight to see who gets him.”

Custody of Children laws. - Page 2 - Baltimore Sun talk forum


Come on girls, don’t be shy.

JPC

How many forums are you a member of? They were beating you up pretty badly on the Balmer Sun forum. Have you found anyone who actually supports you? Please don't quote the 19,000 votes you got. Those people did not vote FOR you. They obviously voted against Hoyer and didn't know anything about you. Have you always been a failure? Why do you enjoy being a loser? Were you ever a real man or have you always been a leech and a menace to society?

 

[VoteJP]

Everybody gets saved on Judgment Day.

... ....

JPC

... ....

This campaign for Governor is going to be exciting and fun.

 

[VoteJP]

Custody means legally stealing the children.

You did not do that on that last 'challenge'. You totally ran away from defending it.

Well I like to chose my own battles, and I do not try to bagger and beat any or all challenges that come along.

I try to stick to the things that are important to me, like the Child Support and Custody garbage going on, and my campaign for Governor, so other debates or comments have not much interest for me in this thread.

You are hypocritical when you feel you can criticize others but they can not criticize you, or at least you do not listen to others' criticisms.

I happen to like criticism and I even invite criticism, but that does not mean the untrue or foolish claims are going to be accepted by me.

That is the way I view it.

You won't be my governor. (Fortunately, you will lose so no one will have to fear being governed by you.)

:shrug::shrug:

 

[hvp05]

Well I like to chose my own battles

Right. You choose when you will get involved and, once you realize you can't handle it, you either digress or ignore the person.

Hey, that's what you did with your family, so I guess everything does come full circle.

I happen to like criticism

You may read it, but you obviously do not take it to heart; if you did, all the people who have told you to shut up over the years would have convinced you that you should do just that.

I even invite criticism

That's the understatement of the day.

 

[VoteJP]

The Child Support problem.

You gotta pay child support

Saw this report in the Enterprise and I say that I have it figured out.

Link = Murder scheme alleged

At the end of that third paragraph it tells that she had his child, and that means the Man was pressured for Child Support, and she is out acting as a single Woman, and per "MMDad" I checked the Man's Court record and he was not being allowed to visit his child.

That is the reason that for some reason nobody else can figure out.

I do not approve of trying to kill the Mom, because I say the Man simply does not equate that the crime against him is empowered and enabled by the unjust Child Support and Custody laws.

So I say his anger was misdirected.

 

[VoteJP]

Blog-o-sphere

After posting that I have thought about adding this more:

The fact is that if I lose then everyone loses too, and if I win then everyone wins too, because I will put a stop to the ongoing ignorance or else if I lose then the ignorance will not be stopped.

And I told all about the ignorant Child Support and Custody laws in my previous campaign, so one would or could figure that the Child Support would be the winner but it is not, because it just meant another two more years of hurting parents and broken families and alienated children and injustice to all.

Families in our society do not profit nor prosper with our laws keeping doing ignorance to parents and to families and there are few to one (1) option for stopping it and that is by voting JP.

The last two years from my last campaign have now passed and the ignorance of the Child Support and Custody procedures have not improved or relaxed but have only hurt more and hurt more and hurt more, which gives everyone the same choice now of continuing to live in the ignorance or finally doing some thing to stop it.

 

[hvp05]

if I lose

If... IF! Aren't you used to losing by now?

 

[VoteJP]

Blog-o-sphere

If... IF! Aren't you used to losing by now?

In politics as in the Tao - to lose is not the same as losing or as a loss.

I did well in both of my previous campaigns, and this time I know from experience that this campaign is progressing very well indeed.

In a lot of ways it would be far harder and far more demanding on me if I actually won.

So you are correct that it is funny, just like I laughed all the way from the spray paint store.

 

[Highlander]

In politics as in the Tao - to lose is not the same as losing or as a loss.

I did well in both of my previous campaigns, and this time I know from experience that this campaign is progressing very well indeed.

In a lot of ways it would be far harder and far more demanding on me if I actually won.

So you are correct that it is funny, just like I laughed all the way from the spray paint store.

Is there really such a place as a Spray Paint Store?

 

[hvp05]

In politics as in the Tao - to lose is not the same as losing or as a loss.

I don't know about the Tao, but in reality to lose means you did not win. Which you didn't; the majority - vast majority - did not support you. You can not even claim a partial win because you're message is still not being widespread or supported even on a grassroots level.

this campaign is progressing very well indeed.

Is it really? How many dedicated supporters do you have? Do you regularly receive e-mails or letters in support of you and/or your beliefs? How many folks stand up for you around here or the Baltimore Sun forum?

In a lot of ways it would be far harder and far more demanding on me if I actually won.

Much as it would be far harder for you to get off your lazy bum and get a regular job. Apparently, neither will be happening anytime this century.

just like I laughed all the way from the spray paint store.

Yeah, keep living it up... and we'll see who ends up laughing on election day.

 

[VoteJP]

Blog-o-sphere

Is there really such a place as a Spray Paint Store?

See now that is funny.

I am happy to see some humor again, and the whole thing is hilarious.

 

[VoteJP]

Blog-o-sphere

I don't know about the Tao, but in reality to lose means you did not win. Which you didn't; the majority - vast majority - did not support you. You can not even claim a partial win because you're message is still not being widespread or supported even on a grassroots level.

I did not know it affected others that way, and I am sorry that I failed to live up to that.

So I confess that I did lose and I blew it and I tried but my trying was insufficient.

I guess I expected others to see it as I see the campaign since I felt that given the circumstances then I felt that I did okay.

So I did lose and I will likely lose this time too, but my duty is to try anyway and that is my intention to do.

Is it really? How many dedicated supporters do you have? Do you regularly receive e-mails or letters in support of you and/or your beliefs? How many folks stand up for you around here or the Baltimore Sun forum?

None of that is relevant in my perspective, and I refuse to allow it to be my own consideration, because I have made it my own criteria to lead alone and not to make the questions of right from wrong (as in the thieving Child Support) to be a deduction of popular opinion nor of democratic voting.

This is my self-sacrifice as in a knight's gambit because that is my power position, and not that way which you describe.