The media is out of hand

AndyMarquisLIVE

New Member
Penn said:
forestal: just what the hell do you think IS at risk?

Our intent is, as far as I can tell, to stop the Islamic Fascists over there - before it gets a foothold on our shores.

Excuse me, upon rethinking that statement, I believe there ARE sleeper cells here already; but the CIA, FBI and other law enforcement agencies are keeping them at bay, watching them so intently, that they dare not make an overt move.

I think the Bush administration's intent is, that if we can achieve a modicum of democracy over in the Middle East, it would be an example to the rest of the neighboring states. That they do not necessarily have to follow in the footsteps of their fathers; there is a better way to get along with others.
I, myself, still don't think Iraq was a threat to us and I think it's made other threats stronger. I'll support a war with Iraq if we proved we were strong against all dictatorships and murderous regimes and had the testicles to do something in Sudan.

EDIT - Most of you consider Iraq a threat but you cannot convince me. When I see the WMD, I'll believe it. I'm for toppling any dictatorship, but not when it makes our country weaker.

Forestal evidently doesn't think Iran is a risk. Nor Syria, Korea, Yemen, Saudi Arabia.
 
Last edited:

Penn

Dancing Up A Storm
vraiblonde said:
His mama just emailed me and said she DOES NOT love you and she thinks you're a twit.

Bored Mommy knows all! :killingme

I don't think you'll be receiving any red ju-ju, now that she has spoken! :lmao:
 

2ndAmendment

Just a forgiven sinner
PREMO Member
PsyOps said:
As much as I respect your position on nearly everything, and I realize Forestal is quite ignorant on many things especially when it comes to our military, I find it disturbing to wish harm on anyone just because they have an opinion, no matter how deeply rooted in ignorance it is.
Let me point out again that I did not say I wished to be the one doing the harm. I did say I would be happy if he/she/it was banned or someone did he/she/it bodily harm, which in retrospect is only partially true. I would be happy if he/she/it were banned.
 

scottrobts

New Member
2ndAmendment said:
Let me point out again that I did not say I wished to be the one doing the harm. I did say I would be happy if he/she/it was banned or someone did he/she/it bodily harm, which in retrospect is only partially true. I would be happy if he/she/it were banned.

and yet you wish harm done to him, the Prince of Peace would be so proud of you, why don't you drop the avatar of Jesus and get one more befitting such an attitude?
 

2ndAmendment

Just a forgiven sinner
PREMO Member
Kerad said:
...
I am more disturbed by the threats of violence towards Forestal...or anybody on here. When even the most ..ahem..."Christian" of you are advocating a murder based on a political discussion on an internet forum...those are the religious extremists that need to be tagged.

They're the ones just one degree of separation away from being Al-Queda.
Please show me where any murder was advocated by me. I have reviewed each of my posts in this thread and it is just not there. You are being a typical liberal and being liberal with my meaning implying something I did not post.

Will you be honorable and post a retraction?
 

2ndAmendment

Just a forgiven sinner
PREMO Member
scottrobts said:
and yet you wish harm done to him, the Prince of Peace would be so proud of you, why don't you drop the avatar of Jesus and get one more befitting such an attitude?
Your reading comprehension seems poor to me. Try this part again and see if your get it.
2ndAmendment said:
I did say I would be happy if he/she/it was banned or someone did he/she/it bodily harm, which in retrospect is only partially true. I would be happy if he/she/it were banned.
 

scottrobts

New Member
2ndAmendment said:
Please show me where any murder was advocated by me. I have reviewed each of my posts in this thread and it is just not there. You are being a typical liberal and being liberal with my meaning implying something I did not post.

Will you be honorable and post a retraction?

who said murder? you wished for bodily harm, which is violence. You have not denied that, have you?
 

Toxick

Splat
scottrobts said:
who said murder?

If you're going to participate in a thread, it might behoove you to read the damned thing.

Kerad said:
I am more disturbed by the threats of violence towards Forestal...or anybody on here. When even the most ..ahem..."Christian" of you are advocating a murder based on a political discussion ...

Yer welcome.


scottrobts said:
you wished for bodily harm, which is violence. You have not denied that, have you?

No he has not, and while I won't speak for 2A, I doubt a denial will be forthcoming. However he has offered a retraction of sorts.

It is the condition of humankind to sin in body and mind. This goes even for the most devout christians among us. We aspire to be better - but oftentimes we fail.


No Christian will ever deny this.
 

scottrobts

New Member
Toxick said:
It is the condition of humankind to sin in body and mind. This goes even for the most devout christians among us. We aspire to be better - but oftentimes we fail.


No Christian will ever deny this.


So it is OK to threaten violence to anyone who doesn't agree with what you say? To hope for and encourage bodily harm to anyone who is not in step with your beliefs? Just as long as you you publish a partial retraction at some point to assuage some deep-felt guilt you might have? You want to claim to be a Christian, do it 7 days a week, not just Sundays, or stop wearing you religion like a mantle for all to see in your pride.
 

Toxick

Splat
scottrobts said:
So it is OK to threaten violence to anyone who doesn't agree with what you say?


Please indicate where I implied that.


scottrobts said:
You want to claim to be a Christian, do it 7 days a week, not just Sundays, or stop wearing you religion like a mantle for all to see in your pride.


1) I didn't claim a single effing thing in my post.
2) You completely ignored what I said.


You, sir, seem to have an incredibly large chip on your shoulder, and you are now trying to draw me into some argument where you're going to attempt to put words into my mouth and put me on the defensive.

Screw that.

Not playing.


Have a nice day.
 

Bustem' Down

Give Peas a Chance
The media is out of hand 02-12-2007 05:32 AM the media is controlled by you conservative freaks, quit your crying

:lmao:
When did I become conservative? This guy must be way left.
 

Penn

Dancing Up A Storm
Bustem' Down said:
The media is out of hand 02-12-2007 05:32 AM the media is controlled by you conservative freaks, quit your crying

:lmao:
When did I become conservative? This guy must be way left.

I got the same red comments you did!


Obviously, they have not heard about a poll taken recently, where something like at least 85 - 90% of journalists and news personnel voted democratic in the last election cycle. :killingme

Not to make too big a deal of it, but you don't think their party affiliation would affect the news they produce, or it's slant?
 

PsyOps

Pixelated
2ndAmendment said:
Let me point out again that I did not say I wished to be the one doing the harm. I did say I would be happy if he/she/it was banned or someone did he/she/it bodily harm, which in retrospect is only partially true. I would be happy if he/she/it were banned.
And I didn't say that it would be you that did the harm.
 

AndyMarquisLIVE

New Member
Penn said:
I got the same red comments you did!


Obviously, they have not heard about a poll taken recently, where something like at least 85 - 90% of journalists and news personnel voted democratic in the last election cycle. :killingme

Not to make too big a deal of it, but you don't think their party affiliation would affect the news they produce, or it's slant?
Evidently, they did not poll FOX News ... sorry FOX Nothing Channel anchors.
 
Top