Throupling anyone?

Yes, we disagree that the Catholic Church is complicit in spreading AIDS. Again, if they are responsible, then you as well for promoting non-fool-proof condom use to people who admit they won't use them anyway.

What's interesting to me, is that you insist that Catholics are not going to follow Catholic teaching on abstinence and are going to have sex regardless, but yet those same Catholics somehow and miraculously follow the teaching on birth control. Also interesting is that you praise Melinda Gates and catholicsforchoice.org for their individual choice, but yet criticize me for laying the spread of AIDS on individual choice. (I'm guessing individual choice is only praise worthy if it's in agreement with you.) You then go as far as to tell me I'm looking at this through a doctrinal lens, which would be hilarious if it weren't so sad because it's actually the contrary. Wth? You have inconsistencies that need to be addressed, and you need to ask yourself why they exist.

Truly, I don't care what your beliefs or non-beliefs are; however, if and when I see you publicly make some asinine and grossly misleading statement that you can't even begin to prove, you can bet I'm going to call you out on it.

“Yes, we disagree that the Catholic Church is complicit in spreading AIDS. Again, if they are responsible, then you as well for promoting non-fool-proof condom use to people who admit they won't use them anyway.”

Pope Benedict and Catholic clergy were both guilty in telling Africans that ‘condoms actually worsen the spread of AIDS’ and ‘Condoms encourage promiscuity and their usage remains a sin in the eyes of the Church. And there are still Catholic Archbishops in SSA speaking out against the use of condoms as you saw in my lost. You’re right in saying many Africans simply won’t use them for a variety of reasons. BUT, many will use them with proper education of their value in AIDS/HIV prevention. And statistics show, condom usage is continuing to increase in SSA.

“What's interesting to me, is that you insist that Catholics are not going to follow Catholic teaching on abstinence and are going to have sex regardless, but yet those same Catholics somehow and miraculously follow the teaching on birth control.”

Some of the most devout, will try to adhere to Catholic teaching and avoid using contraceptives, but can get themselves infected if they fail with their effort to maintain 100% abstinence. Studies show, those trying to maintain abstinence, are more likely to fail to use contraception when they succumb to human urges and fail to maintain their chastity.

“Also interesting is that you praise Melinda Gates and catholicsforchoice.org for their individual choice, but yet criticize me for laying the spread of AIDS on individual choice. (I'm guessing individual choice is only praise worthy if it's in agreement with you.)”

As you know, Gates and catholicsforchoice.org recognized that the Vatican is taking the wrong approach resulting in more HIV/AIDS deaths, and have stepped in to take an activist stance against official Church dogma. The ‘choice’ for their activism, was a very well thought out and researched one based on data, studies, and the expert opinions of world health organizations. They have made a tough choice to reject the Church’s stance, and put themselves on the line for the greater good of humanity.

For me, this is much different than the ‘choice’ of an African (or anyone for that matter) to have sex or not to have sex; to use contraceptives or not; or to try to adhere to Church doctrine or not. As you know, this ‘choice’ is often made in the heat of the moment without much deliberation. The biological urge to have sex, often overrides cognitive decision making. Studies have shown that people are much more apt to use birth control for 'spontaneous' sex, if they have been educated previously in its importance to prevent HIV/AIDS or unwanted pregnancy.

With no education on their use, poor availability, or with the stigma of the sinfulness of condoms, their use is less likely. Catholic teaching and influence has negatively impacted condom use in all these scenarios for the last 15 years in SSA. But they are losing their doctrinal battle as the world has stepped in.

“You then go as far as to tell me I'm looking at this through a doctrinal lens, which would be hilarious if it weren't so sad because it's actually the contrary. Wth? You have inconsistencies that need to be addressed, and you need to ask yourself why they exist. “

They are only ‘inconsistencies’ by your thinking or my failure to explain things clearly. Hopefully some of my reply on this post will clear some of these ‘inconsistencies’. If not, I tried.

“Truly, I don't care what your beliefs or non-beliefs are; however, if and when I see you publicly make some asinine and grossly misleading statement that you can't even begin to prove, you can bet I'm going to call you out on it.”

Feel free to ‘call me out’. Just realize regarding this particular issue, that I am not going out on a limb with my views here. Nearly all Western European countries and World Health organizations have been very critical (if not outraged) by the actions of the Vatican and have been very steadfast in their criticism of the Church regarding this issue for more than a decade. Western Europe is much more willing to criticize Religion (including direct criticism of the Vatican) than the USA, my opinion. American’s tend to be detached, unless it affects them directly, as was the case with Pedophile Priests.

I will continue to speak out against the crimes against mankind, perpetrated by all religions, not just Catholicism, especially modern day issues like this one.
 
I don't think any sex-ed is all that effective, especially school-provided sex-ed. Home-taught sex-ed isn’t full-proof either; but I think that’s where the responsibility lies, not in our schools. I teach my kids abstinence first. I convey the message that if you want to avoid getting pregnant or getting a girl pregnant, the only way to avoid this is to not have sex. I couple this with long discussions about how life changes when you have a kid. Schools don’t do this. And the one thing school can’t provide in these discussions, that families/parents can, is love. Our children’s teachers don’t love our kids; not nearly in a way that a parent does.

I agree with you that Parents should be very active in teaching their kids sex ed. Schools can help but appear all over the place with their approach in the US. Researchers say the reason Western European Teen pregnancy rates are so much lower than America's, is their emphasis on contraception. Some indicate that Religious stigma can have an adverse affect.
 

Bird Dog

Bird Dog
PREMO Member
“Yes, we disagree that the Catholic Church is complicit in spreading AIDS. Again, if they are responsible, then you as well for promoting non-fool-proof condom use to people who admit they won't use them anyway.”

Pope Benedict and Catholic clergy were both guilty in telling Africans that ‘condoms actually worsen the spread of AIDS’ and ‘Condoms encourage promiscuity and their usage remains a sin in the eyes of the Church. And there are still Catholic Archbishops in SSA speaking out against the use of condoms as you saw in my lost. You’re right in saying many Africans simply won’t use them for a variety of reasons. BUT, many will use them with proper education of their value in AIDS/HIV prevention. And statistics show, condom usage is continuing to increase in SSA.

“What's interesting to me, is that you insist that Catholics are not going to follow Catholic teaching on abstinence and are going to have sex regardless, but yet those same Catholics somehow and miraculously follow the teaching on birth control.”

Some of the most devout, will try to adhere to Catholic teaching and avoid using contraceptives, but can get themselves infected if they fail with their effort to maintain 100% abstinence. Studies show, those trying to maintain abstinence, are more likely to fail to use contraception when they succumb to human urges and fail to maintain their chastity.

“Also interesting is that you praise Melinda Gates and catholicsforchoice.org for their individual choice, but yet criticize me for laying the spread of AIDS on individual choice. (I'm guessing individual choice is only praise worthy if it's in agreement with you.)”

As you know, Gates and catholicsforchoice.org recognized that the Vatican is taking the wrong approach resulting in more HIV/AIDS deaths, and have stepped in to take an activist stance against official Church dogma. The ‘choice’ for their activism, was a very well thought out and researched one based on data, studies, and the expert opinions of world health organizations. They have made a tough choice to reject the Church’s stance, and put themselves on the line for the greater good of humanity.

For me, this is much different than the ‘choice’ of an African (or anyone for that matter) to have sex or not to have sex; to use contraceptives or not; or to try to adhere to Church doctrine or not. As you know, this ‘choice’ is often made in the heat of the moment without much deliberation. The biological urge to have sex, often overrides cognitive decision making. Studies have shown that people are much more apt to use birth control for 'spontaneous' sex, if they have been educated previously in its importance to prevent HIV/AIDS or unwanted pregnancy.

With no education on their use, poor availability, or with the stigma of the sinfulness of condoms, their use is less likely. Catholic teaching and influence has negatively impacted condom use in all these scenarios for the last 15 years in SSA. But they are losing their doctrinal battle as the world has stepped in.

“You then go as far as to tell me I'm looking at this through a doctrinal lens, which would be hilarious if it weren't so sad because it's actually the contrary. Wth? You have inconsistencies that need to be addressed, and you need to ask yourself why they exist. “

They are only ‘inconsistencies’ by your thinking or my failure to explain things clearly. Hopefully some of my reply on this post will clear some of these ‘inconsistencies’. If not, I tried.

“Truly, I don't care what your beliefs or non-beliefs are; however, if and when I see you publicly make some asinine and grossly misleading statement that you can't even begin to prove, you can bet I'm going to call you out on it.”

Feel free to ‘call me out’. Just realize regarding this particular issue, that I am not going out on a limb with my views here. Nearly all Western European countries and World Health organizations have been very critical (if not outraged) by the actions of the Vatican and have been very steadfast in their criticism of the Church regarding this issue for more than a decade. Western Europe is much more willing to criticize Religion (including direct criticism of the Vatican) than the USA, my opinion. American’s tend to be detached, unless it affects them directly, as was the case with Pedophile Priests.

I will continue to speak out against the crimes against mankind, perpetrated by all religions, not just Catholicism, especially modern day issues like this one.

There are people out there who can help you.
You do not have to live in this self created agony.
 

hotcoffee

New Member
I think you missed the boat on this one, hun. It is/was a discussion with an Atheist, or at least someone who dislikes religion. I don't think he's going to be talking with us on how to spread the Good News. :lol:

Just pointing out the irony, Radiant.

When we argue with the devil, we give him a voice.

:coffee:
 

PsyOps

Pixelated
I agree with you that Parents should be very active in teaching their kids sex ed. Schools can help but appear all over the place with their approach in the US. Researchers say the reason Western European Teen pregnancy rates are so much lower than America's, is their emphasis on contraception. Some indicate that Religious stigma can have an adverse affect.

I’m not even remotely suggesting ‘religious stigma’ should be a factor in our schools teaching sex ed. In fact, I am promoting just the opposite. I’m suggesting that teaching sex in our school should be limited to the biology of it and that’s it. Leave the other stuff out of it: safe sex, alternative lifestyles, how life will change, how to put a condom on a cucumber, if you’re doing to do it use a condom, the morality of it, etc… It’s especially bothersome for me that some teacher that I really don’t know is telling my kid “If you’re going to have sex, have safe sex…” This isn’t a teacher’s place to tell my child “if you’re going to have sex…” I don’t trust someone I don’t know to send such a message to my child. I don’t need some teacher telling my kid something that may be contrary to what I want them to know when it comes to making that decision. Just stick to the biology of it and leave the rest to the parents.
 
Last edited:
I don't care what you recommend. I have provided you with facts-from a predominantly catholic country in ssa. You are a hack. Probably never left the states. One of the most pro-abortion leaders to ever hold a leadership position in a ssa country (much less the world) just died this year. The whole world celebrated him. Still shaking my head. Certainly you've heard of him. I'm sure you mourned ol' Nelson like everyone else.

Data you say....

Permitted to protect the woman’s mental health as well as her life and physical health:

Botswana – R/I/F
Gambia
Ghana – R/I/F
Liberia – R/I/F Namibia – R/I/F
Sierra Leone
Swaziland – R/I/F

In addition to protecting the woman’s life and physical and mental health, permitted on socio- economic grounds, such as a woman’s economic resources, her age, marital status, and number of children:

Zambia – F

Without restriction as to reason (during first trimester):

Cape Verde
South Africa

Note: R – Abortion permitted in cases of rape I – Abortion permitted in cases of incest F – Abortion permitted in cases of fetal impairment SA – Spousal authorization required PA – Parental authorization/notification required + – Abortion permitted on additional enumerated grounds relat- ing to such factors as the woman’s age or capacity to care for a child Source: Center for Reproductive Rights, World’s Abortion Laws (2009).

Nice Christian response. Btw, ever hear of psychological projection? You exemplify it. Posting data finally, good, albeit 4 year old data, but you're making progress.
 
I’m not even remotely suggesting ‘religious stigma’ should be a factor in our schools teaching sex ed. In fact, I am promoting just the opposite. I’m suggesting that teaching sex in our school should be limited to the biology of it and that’s it. Leave the other stuff out of it: safe sex, alternative lifestyles, how life will change, how to put a condom on a cucumber, if you’re doing to do it use a condom, the morality of it, etc… It’s especially bothersome for me that some teacher that I really don’t know is telling my kid “If you’re going to have sex, have safe sex…” This isn’t a teacher’s place to tell my child “if you’re going to have sex…” I don’t trust someone I don’t know to send such a message to my child. I don’t need some teacher telling my kid something that may be contrary to what I want them to know when it comes to making that decision. Just stick to the biology of it and leave the rest to the parents.

Can't say that I disagree with that perspective. Would it work? I would say yes for the parents who do a good job with their end of it. For the mass population, maybe not.
 
There are people out there who can help you.
You do not have to live in this self created agony.

Thanks but no-thanks. Especially if you are talking about some of the inmates who happen to be running this asylum. I think it's you and others who could use some serious psyche counseling.
 

PsyOps

Pixelated
Can't say that I disagree with that perspective. Would it work? I would say yes for the parents who do a good job with their end of it. For the mass population, maybe not.

I’m certainly not telling you anything you don’t already know, but there are no guarantees in this world. But if you want to guarantee failure, let the government handle it. When it comes to these moral and deeply personal issues, the best place for these discussions/teachings should be in the home. Look at our public schools in general… they are largely an abysmal failure. The government has very little interest in educating. They are far more interested in pushing political/social agendas on our kids in order to mold their minds for when they become voters.
 

Larry Gude

Strung Out
I’m certainly not telling you anything you don’t already know, but there are no guarantees in this world. But if you want to guarantee failure, let the government handle it. .

Not so. It will work and that is why so many want the government in charge; ultimately, it WILL work. It will just be more expensive, less efficient and not as good as a good or service motivated by profit and competition. I mean, I know what you mean in the larger sense, as per a for profit effort but, just wanted to clarify because THAT is why so many appeal to the government.
 

PsyOps

Pixelated
Not so. It will work and that is why so many want the government in charge; ultimately, it WILL work. It will just be more expensive, less efficient and not as good as a good or service motivated by profit and competition. I mean, I know what you mean in the larger sense, as per a for profit effort but, just wanted to clarify because THAT is why so many appeal to the government.

What the heck are you talking about? I'm talking about parents dealing with these moral issues (i.e. sex ed) as opposed to government/schools.
 
Top