PsyOps
Pixelated
verreaction:
Police pull cars over all the time for driving through high drug areas. Watch cops sometime. They investigate purely on suspicion.
It was an analogy... that's all.
verreaction:
Police pull cars over all the time for driving through high drug areas. Watch cops sometime. They investigate purely on suspicion.
Hey dummy, a lot of that stuff was investigated by congressional committee. Trey Gowdey pretty much made a career of investigating Hillary.
again, it was investigated wasnt it. You didnt like the result, but it was investigated and none of you tards were bitching about that
You're damn right I didn't like the result; and this not just coming from some whiny "I didn't get my way" standpoint. Hillary Clinton committed crimes. Her server was found through a different investigation. HARD EVIDENCE, not innuendo and assumptions. Investigators FOUND ACTUAL EVIDENCE! When you find HARD EVIDENCE, that warrants an investigation. Making assumptions based on thin circumstances does not warrant this sort investigation. What the hell is so hard about seeing what Clinton did as criminal. Comey was derelict in his duties by making up some bull### standard of "intent".
With the Clinton scandal, I know for certain she is guilty of INTENTIONALLY mishandling classified; something Comey even admitted would land anyone else in a lot of trouble. You can keep playing off like you know better and think we're all a bunch of stupid misguided partisans just wanting to put a liberal in prison; I frankly don't give a damn. You obvious don't know #### about it, and I can say that with absolute confidence. Clinton should be resting comfortably in a prison cell right now; but our corrupt government saw it differently. And now the standard has been set that anyone mishandling classified can use the Hillary defense that they didn't "intend" to. You seem disinterested in this new standard that has dangerously been set by Comey and Lynch.
A side question, do you think this would disturb Bill at all?
And I appreciate that you were thoughtful enough to provide one that proves my pointIt was an analogy... that's all.
You're damn right I didn't like the result; and this not just coming from some whiny "I didn't get my way" standpoint. Hillary Clinton committed crimes. Her server was found through a different investigation. HARD EVIDENCE, not innuendo and assumptions. Investigators FOUND ACTUAL EVIDENCE! When you find HARD EVIDENCE, that warrants an investigation. Making assumptions based on thin circumstances does not warrant this sort investigation. What the hell is so hard about seeing what Clinton did as criminal. Comey was derelict in his duties by making up some bull### standard of "intent".
With the Clinton scandal, I know for certain she is guilty of INTENTIONALLY mishandling classified; something Comey even admitted would land anyone else in a lot of trouble. You can keep playing off like you know better and think we're all a bunch of stupid misguided partisans just wanting to put a liberal in prison; I frankly don't give a damn. You obvious don't know #### about it, and I can say that with absolute confidence. Clinton should be resting comfortably in a prison cell right now; but our corrupt government saw it differently. And now the standard has been set that anyone mishandling classified can use the Hillary defense that they didn't "intend" to. You seem disinterested in this new standard that has dangerously been set by Comey and Lynch.
And really, your example if the clinton email server makes my point too. That was discovered in the Benghazi investigation and the left had been protesting for months that trey gowdey was on a witch hunt. Remember they were investigating suspicion and allegations related to lies. Nothing illegal was found in relation to Benghazi, right?
Next, the FBI got involved with the investigation based on the allegation/suspicion that she handled classified information on her server. There was no evidence it had happened, it was a suspicion. So the FBI investigated.
Just like what is happening now.
I'm just not going to try to reason with you on this. You're locked in some sort of denial about what really happened in Benghazi and the Clinton email scandal. There were tons - TONS - of evidence that warranted both of those investigations.
what illegal happened in benghazi to warrant the investigation?
An American Embassadors Plea for assistance, ignored and declined by elected and appointed office-holders, resulting in his capture, torture and execution.
as much as i dont like it, i dont see anyuthing illegal there. Governement officals often are forced to make decisions that may result in the loss of peoples lives.
Dead Americans due to incompetence, dereliction of duty, and negligence... happens all the time. Who cares?
Oh, and then to go to the people and tell them the attack was due to protests of a video, in an effort to cover up their incompetence, dereliction of duty, and negligence. Lying to the American people. Happens all the time. No big deal. Oh, unless it's Donald Jr.
It happens. But YOUR BAR is illegal activity. Which part was illegal?Dead Americans due to incompetence, dereliction of duty, and negligence... happens all the time. Who cares?
Oh, and then to go to the people and tell them the attack was due to protests of a video, in an effort to cover up their incompetence, dereliction of duty, and negligence. Lying to the American people. Happens all the time. No big deal. Oh, unless it's Donald Jr.
Thats exactly it.
No one is saying it never happens, just when it does there is supposed to be an analysis, review, those responsible for the error held so.
In this case. None of it. Too bad, so sad, bye-bye. It's Hillary and the Messiah so no consequence.
It happens. But YOUR BAR is illegal activity. Which part was illegal?
None of it. Four Americans are dead due to gross negligence, and nothing illegal about it.
Point out the crime. :shrug:
Sad, yes. A crime, no.
Point out the crime. :shrug:
Sad, yes. A crime, no.