Or Ace of Spades.
You don't know how to use sites like AoS. I do. I find more good links to more good articles from that one site than from about any other single location.
Or Ace of Spades.
We have very little control over who gets up there. .
So I go to the polls knowing I am doing my part in trying to at least slow the train, since I know I can’t turn it around. Our destiny is still going to be the same whether you stay home or not.
You don't know how to use sites like PoS. I do. I find more good links to more good articles from that one site than from about any other single location.
And what have you changed by staying home? But I'm all for you being free to not play. I thank God we aren't like Australia.
And that is why I never lose hope; we DO have control. The simple reality is that most people will be happy to vote for whomever their party nominates BECAUSE it's not the other guys.
That we don't use the power we have better, at least better as you and I may define it, does not mean we don't have the power.
So, either we stop being party first or we keep doing what we do and hope it changes on it's own.
If you study Republican behavior over the past quarter-century, you’ll find that the image of conservative lawmakers standing resolutely for American strength and unity is a myth. Republicans support wars launched by Republican presidents. When Democratic presidents undertake wars or negotiations, Republicans generally attempt to sabotage them. In fact, Republicans often side with our enemies.
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_..._enemies_john_mccain_mitch_mcconnell_and.html
First off, why would you assume my goal is to change anything? Though I will point out there are plenty of things one can do to change political outcomes outside of the voting booth.
Secondly, what have you changed by voting?
"If voting changed anything, they'd make it illegal." --Emma Goldman
Nothing changes because a very few say it needs to, while the vast majority aren't interested. I haven't lost hope. My hope in change begins when things have gotten so bad that the masses actually wake up. I don't see that playing out well. Until then, folks are going to remain complacent and keep pushing us in the same direction.
In your lifetime, when have you ever seen our government manage a war successfully? In other words, when you have seen them forget about politics and just let the military do what needs to be done? Destroy the enemy.
What does 'bad enough' look like? A pal keeps saying that as though some rule applies. TARP and QE are new 'rules'. President Obama has over seen a system where the markets rebounded based on QE and that has placated MILLIONS who are simply happy their 401 ks look good again. That lesson is not going to be lost on future Presidents nor will the lessons of TARP.
I thought I made it clear that voting is sort of like watching the Superbowl, in that it’s something I do because I enjoy it, and because I feel because we have this thing called freedom I enjoy, even more, exercising that freedom with the thought of all of those who died protecting it. I feel I am honoring their sacrifice by participating in a really cool process. I do not expect you or anyone else to feel that way. And I do not expect any sort of change out of it.
And your quote is nonsense. The central point of voting is to change the dynamics of our politics. Does it result in that every time? Of course not. How about this: If no one voted, nothing would change. I don't know about you, but dictatorships don't appeal to me.
Well, I don't watch professional sports of any kind (I do know what the superbowl is, however), so I'm sorry that I don't relate to that analogy all that well. No matter.
OK, so you don't expect voting to foment any sort of change, but you still do it. So it's an ego stroke. Sometimes your team wins and you feel good, other times, perhaps not. I understand that. But I can look at my handsome self in the mirror to get that sort of emotional response.
:shrug:
We want to argue Obama is worse, we want to argue Hillary will be worse but objectively, based on what? How are they, really, worse? Obama merely has the Stimulus and the ACA.
My argument is that, absent our natural bias to excuse our own and exaggerate the ills of the other team, that, objectively, the GOP has proven worse from a limited government and trust the American people view.
In your lifetime, when have you ever seen our government manage a war successfully? In other words, when you have seen them forget about politics and just let the military do what needs to be done? Destroy the enemy.
WWII comes pretty close.
If you study Republican behavior over the past quarter-century, you’ll find that the image of conservative lawmakers standing resolutely for American strength and unity is a myth. Republicans support wars launched by Republican presidents. When Democratic presidents undertake wars or negotiations, Republicans generally attempt to sabotage them. In fact, Republicans often side with our enemies.
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_..._enemies_john_mccain_mitch_mcconnell_and.html
Yes, yes, the Republicans have destroyed THE WON's foreign effectiveness. But I wonder why all the Democrats on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee voted against THE WON this week.
And also Obama and Hillary want to let gay homos get married (to each other!) and there's affirmative action, and the gun thing.
And abortion. Obama and Hillary are pro-abortion too.
Why do you hate America?
For most smokers, they don't quit until their health is so badly impacted that they wake up to the reality of what it's done to them. I really feel most people operate their lives this way. As long as life is good for them for now, let's just keep doing what we're doing. As a collective, it gets more complicated. .