Years ago, I'd mentioned before - I knew a woman who was very intelligent - and I said to her "You do think your opinion is always right, don't you?" to which she answered "why would I believe something that is wrong?". I laughed. The very nature of an open mind is introspection, examining your own ideas and scrutinizing them - because you may ALWAYS be wrong. I've found over the years, just about everything I believe was wrong on at least some part of it.
Believing your opinion is the correct one and open-mindedness are not mutually exclusive conditions.
I have often said something very similar to what the woman in your example has said, particularly when discussing religion - right here in these very fourms.
Them -> You Christians and your God.... you believe that only your religion is the right one and everyone else is wrong.
Me-> Well.... yeah - why would I believe in something I think is wrong.
This does not mean that I have shut off the input valve, or that I am incapable of changing my opinion/belief in the face of new data.
However, as it stands now, I unashamedly admit that I believe that EVERY SINGLE ONE of my:
- Religious beliefs
- Political views
- Social values
- Sets of ethics
- Food choices
... Are, indeed, the correct ones.
To believe in anything else is nothing more than cognitive dissonance, and frankly stupid.
This isn't close-mindedness. This is the definition of "opinion"
The problem is when you believe your opinion is fact.
You must recognize your opinion is just that. That's when you become an ass hole.
- but the ONLY right one. Like a mathematical equation that has but one solution, the approach from these progressives is that if there's only one answer - then every other one is a THREAT to it. If to solve this or that problem,
THIS..... This is the heart of the problem IMO.
Every time I get into a discussion with a leftist, when I express a contrary view, they immediately become extremely defensive and hostile, as if I didn't say I thought they were wrong, but as if what I said was not only a personal affront, but that I have intentions of physically harming them.
They bandy about terms like "objectively harmful" when there is no such thing in the arena of ideals.
To be fair, when I get into it with a conservative, they have a less
hostile response, but every bit as contemptuous and with the closed-off avenue of communication where they express sincere doubt in my intelligence, even after having demonstrated that I'm not a slobbering cow. When discussing with conservatives, I often hear statements like:
"You seem so smart, why are you so stupid on this subject"
The hubris expressed in this statement is no less than decrying an opinion as "objectively harmful".
If someone seems smart otherwise, then perhaps their opinion
may possibly have some merit, and deserves a shred more respect and consideration. I've always said, "What value is a good reputation if it means nothing in the face of doubt"