so you were there in the room, or on the phone call ?
yeah I did not think so ........
smart enough to you in .....
But I guess you are perfectly fine with medical providers that can no longer afford to provide 'affordable' services due to the outrageous costs of malpractice insurance since jurys have awarded BILLIONS in lawsuit decisions? You are perfectly fine paying 200 to 300% of what the same services cost just a few years ago?
Of course you are. I am guessing you don't pay a cent! Probably the tax payers picking up the tab.....amiright?
No.
Has he indicated that he will veto this bill?
Vice-presidents rarely, if ever, vote against the wishes of their boss when breaking ties in the Senate.
How is that a difficult position to understand?
Consumers then have no way of knowing the product is dangerous and continue to use it until the cost of arbitration is too much for the company or they redesign a faulty product.
Can you not read? Do you prefer I come
Over and dictate all the news to you?
This law allows companies to force consumer into arbitration. The results of which are generally under a gag order. So a company that makes a product can injure hundreds of consumers while quietly paying them off a small sum. Consumers then have no way of knowing the product is dangerous and continue to use it until the cost of arbitration is too much for the company or they redesign a faulty product.
They no longer will have to litigate these cases in public or say if they knew about the issue prior to sale and deem the risk worth the reward.
“It robs consumers of their most effective legal tool against corporate wrongdoing,” Cordray said. “As a result, companies like Wells Fargo and Equifax remain free to break the law without fear of legal blowback from their customers.”
George Slover, senior policy counsel for Consumers Union, said the vote “means that big financial companies can lock the courthouse doors and prevent consumers who’ve been mistreated from joining together to seek the relief they deserve under the law.”
For years, Wells Fargo used arbitration clauses to block lawsuits from customers who alleged that unauthorized accounts had been opened in their names. Ultimately, the bank estimated that as many as 3.5 million such accounts were opened.
The bank agreed to settle some class-actions suits, but not until the CFPB, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Los Angeles city attorney’s office fined the bank over those practices last year. Even in cases that the bank settled, it had argued that the plaintiffs could not sue because of arbitration clauses.”
http://www.latimes.com/topic/business/equifax-ORCRP005319-topic.html
Watch Hot Coffe. You will see the same exact thing happened with story reform years ago to the detriment of the consumer
But I guess you are perfectly fine with medical providers that can no longer afford to provide 'affordable' services due to the outrageous costs of malpractice insurance since jurys have awarded BILLIONS in lawsuit decisions? You are perfectly fine paying 200 to 300% of what the same services cost just a few years ago?
Of course you are. I am guessing you don't pay a cent! Probably the tax payers picking up the tab.....amiright?
Well, if there hadn't been DRs committing malpractice in the first place, there would be no need for jurys to give awards.
Well, if there hadn't been DRs committing malpractice in the first place, there would be no need for jurys to give awards.
If you think Mike Pence is in lockstep with Trump, You don't know much about Michael Pence..
we wouldn't need tort reform in this country if the system was altruistic
instead of abused with spurious lawsuits
He is while he is working for Trump.
I told you before, We would take the bus to Anacostia to see Pam Grier's newest movie.
Coffy was ok but nothing special..
View attachment 120292
But I guess you are perfectly fine with medical providers that can no longer afford to provide 'affordable' services due to the outrageous costs of malpractice insurance since jurys have awarded BILLIONS in lawsuit decisions? You are perfectly fine paying 200 to 300% of what the same services cost just a few years ago?
Of course you are. I am guessing you don't pay a cent! Probably the tax payers picking up the tab.....amiright?
how difficult is if for YOU to understand spurious lawsuits drive up the costs for EVERYONE ....
Asbestos = wasn't bothering anyone hanging around on pipes ... or tile floors
Silicon Breast Implants = when the science FINALLY came in - no relation to implants and the disorders claimed
Second Hand Smoke = extrapolated from miners that developed lung caner after working in uranium mines We Used Terrible Science to Justify Smoking Bans
yes McDonald's should not be serving coffee @ 180 degrees
- but CUSTOMERS bitch when the get to work and their coffee is cold
- so McDonald's jacks up the coffee temperature
but what pat of 'this coffee is HOT' is difficult to understand
if something is that dangerous word will get around especially on the internet today .....
we wouldn't need tort reform in this country if the system was altruistic
instead of abused with spurious lawsuits
You can say that all you want, they have had multiple kerfuffles on each other's opinions in the past year.
You don't know much about Mike Pence..
Well, if there hadn't been DRs committing malpractice in the first place, there would be no need for jurys to give awards.
So what? You just as bad as Gillian posing pics of his crap to prove himself.