🔥 The Biden Raid roundup.

[Gilligan]

You seem really sad. Is it depression?

Self-loathing is obviously a large component of his dementia...

 

[Gilligan]

To be fair, there are quite a few "regulars" on here that spew ethnic and racial hate.

Examples? because I'm all about being fair and chit...

 

[OccamsRazor]

Examples? because I'm all about being fair and chit...

Sure. Take some time and look up past posts from some on this very thread

 

[Gilligan]

Sure. Take some time and look up past posts from some on this very thread

Ahh. Your assertion but I get to defend it.

Not happening.

 

[Bare-ya-cuda]

Sure. Take some time and look up past posts from some on this very thread

Following

 

[OccamsRazor]

Ahh. Your assertion but I get to defend it.

Not happening.

Actually, its not an assertion. Its a fact. If you want answers, feel free to do the work yourself. Isn't that the standing ethos around here?

 

[Gilligan]

Actually, its not an assertion. Its a fact. If you want answers, feel free to do the work yourself. Isn't that the standing ethos around here?

It's your assertion. You made it. You own it.

 

[OccamsRazor]

It's your assertion. You made it. You own it.

I do own that fact. You are on here enough, you should know how to do the work. Probably don't even need to do the work. You are on here enough to have seen it time and time again.

 

[Gilligan]

Shifting the Burden of Proof: A classic fallacy of logos that challenges an opponent to disprove a claim rather than asking the person making the claim to defend his/her own argument. E.g., "These days space-aliens are everywhere among us, masquerading as true humans, even right here on campus! I dare you to prove it isn't so! See? You can't! You admit it! That means what I say has to be true. Most probably, you're one of them, since you seem to be so soft on space-aliens!" A typical tactic in using this fallacy is first to get an opponent to admit that a far-fetched claim, or some fact related to it, is indeed at least theoretically "possible," and then declare the claim "proven" absent evidence to the contrary. E.g., "So you admit that massive undetected voter fraud is indeed possible under our current system, and could have happened in this country at least in theory, and you can't produce even the tiniest scintilla of evidence that it didn't actually happen! Ha-ha! I rest my case." See also, Argument from Ignorance.

 

[Gilligan]

I do own that fact. You are on here enough, you should know how to do the work.

I'll never fall for that fallacy.

 

[OccamsRazor]

Gee.. for someone who spends most of their day on here, you certainly seem to need a lot of hand holding. The proof is right here in these very forums you inhabit daily.
I thought you were a business owner. Does someone have to tell you how to do that too?

 

[Gilligan]

Gee.. for someone who spends most of their day on here, you certainly seem to need a lot of hand holding. The proof is right here in these very forums you inhabit daily.
I thought you were a business owner. Does someone have to tell you how to do that too?

Shifting the Burden of Proof: A classic fallacy of logos that challenges an opponent to disprove a claim rather than asking the person making the claim to defend his/her own argument. E.g., "These days space-aliens are everywhere among us, masquerading as true humans, even right here on campus! I dare you to prove it isn't so! See? You can't! You admit it! That means what I say has to be true. Most probably, you're one of them, since you seem to be so soft on space-aliens!" A typical tactic in using this fallacy is first to get an opponent to admit that a far-fetched claim, or some fact related to it, is indeed at least theoretically "possible," and then declare the claim "proven" absent evidence to the contrary. E.g., "So you admit that massive undetected voter fraud is indeed possible under our current system, and could have happened in this country at least in theory, and you can't produce even the tiniest scintilla of evidence that it didn't actually happen! Ha-ha! I rest my case." See also, Argument from Ignorance.

 

[OccamsRazor]

Gee.. for someone who spends most of their day on here, you certainly seem to need a lot of hand holding. The proof is right here in these very forums you inhabit daily.
I thought you were a business owner. Does someone have to tell you how to do that too?

I guess so

 

[GURPS]

To be fair, there are quite a few "regulars" on here that spew ethnic and racial hate.

 

[GURPS]

Actually, its not an assertion. Its a fact. If you want answers, feel free to do the work yourself. Isn't that the standing ethos around here?

so you have nothing, Gotcha

 

[Gilligan]

so you have nothing, Gotcha

That was my conclusion as well.

 

[HemiHauler]

Shifting the Burden of Proof: A classic fallacy of logos that challenges an opponent to disprove a claim rather than asking the person making the claim to defend his/her own argument. E.g., "These days space-aliens are everywhere among us, masquerading as true humans, even right here on campus! I dare you to prove it isn't so! See? You can't! You admit it! That means what I say has to be true. Most probably, you're one of them, since you seem to be so soft on space-aliens!" A typical tactic in using this fallacy is first to get an opponent to admit that a far-fetched claim, or some fact related to it, is indeed at least theoretically "possible," and then declare the claim "proven" absent evidence to the contrary. E.g., "So you admit that massive undetected voter fraud is indeed possible under our current system, and could have happened in this country at least in theory, and you can't produce even the tiniest scintilla of evidence that it didn't actually happen! Ha-ha! I rest my case." See also, Argument from Ignorance.

From the king of logical fallacies. LOL

 

[Gilligan]

From the king of logical fallacies. LOL

oh. Zing.

 

[PrchJrkr]

This thread jus' keeps gettin' gooder and gooder.

 

[GURPS]

According to a new report, Joe Biden’s fingerprints are all over the Mar-a-Lago raid.


Just the News validates what serious lawyers who understand government workings have suspected since August 8: Joe Biden facilitated and signed off on the FBI raid on Trump’s home.

Long before it professed no prior knowledge of the raid on Donald Trump’s estate, the Biden White House worked directly with the Justice Department and National Archives to instigate the criminal probe into alleged mishandling of documents, allowing the FBI to review evidence retrieved from Mar-a-Lago this spring and eliminating the 45th president’s claims to executive privilege, according to contemporaneous government documents reviewed by Just the News.
The memos show then-White House Deputy Counsel Jonathan Su was engaged in conversations with the FBI, DOJ and National Archives as early as April, shortly after 15 boxes of classified and other materials were voluntarily returned to the federal historical agency from Trump’s Florida home.
By May, Su conveyed to the Archives that President Joe Biden would not object to waiving his predecessor’s claims to executive privilege, a decision that opened the door for DOJ to get a grand jury to issue a subpoena compelling Trump to turn over any remaining materials he possessed from his presidency.

Joe Biden, therefore, foreclosed his predecessor’s ability to invoke privilege on materials that had been perfectly legal for him to possess and which Trump had declassified before taking copies to Mar-a-Lago. This put a records kerfuffle in the hands of federal law enforcement. From there, the FBI did what it does so well: wrote an application for a search warrant so broad that all of Hunter’s hookers, ex-wives, girlfriends, and crack dealers could walk through it with arms outstretched.

In short: the Biden Administration turned a records imbroglio into a criminal offense.

Joe Biden's Fingerprints Are All Over the FBI Mar-a-Lago Panty Raid

pjmedia.com