Allah Had No Son

K

Kain99

Guest
:popcorn: D A M N, you must know I just can not do that.

I would prefer that she hate me then to feel any animosity for Islam.:bawl:

Well buddy you cannot dictate that. They killed our brothers on our soil and that is something we can never forget.

I'd just like her to see the bigger picture.
 

JPC sr

James P. Cusick Sr.
The big pic.

Well buddy you cannot dictate that. They killed our brothers on our soil and that is something we can never forget.

I'd just like her to see the bigger picture.
:tantrum Islam did not do that.

Islam did not attack us and 9-11 was not an Islamic action.

There are Muslim criminals and those do not represent the billion people of Islam.

Some trouble makers are trying to turn events into a Christian verses Muslim type war and that must be avoided.

:wah:
 

This_person

Well-Known Member
Islam did not do that. Islam did not attack us and 9-11 was not an Islamic action. There are Muslim criminals and those do not represent the billion people of Islam. Some trouble makers are trying to turn events into a Christian verses Muslim type war and that must be avoided.
That "jihad" is a very mis-used word. It is similar to "crusade" in that Bush ordered the American crusade against the Muslims of Afghanistan and Iraq but after Bush said it they decided to use other terminology.
Those "troublemakers" would be people like YOU. When you make some completely unfounded, idiotic claim like "Bush ordered a crusade against Muslims", you feed hate. You create an atmosphere that is entirely untrue.

Just like the Muslims that attacked us in the name of jihad (they used the term first) for their religious views (they are the ones who claim this, not me) don't represent their religion, there was no "American crusade" against Muslims. They don't represent, and we didn't go after them for, their religion.

First, you repeatedly race bait in other threads, now you're trying to relgion-bait in this one.

Act like an adult with the good sense God gave goats, at least, Jimmy.
 

tommyjones

New Member
I had no desire to provoke you more; anything I say at this point will be taken with hostility.<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:eek:ffice:eek:ffice" /><o:p></o:p>
But since you asked.<o:p></o:p>
It was a fact of life in that culture, and people would sell themselves off as slaves to pay debts, being a bond servant in that culture was not the same as being a slave in the US or England. Even being forced into slavery by the Egyptians was bad, but not the same. But God delivered his own people into the hands of Pharaoh for their disobedience. It's a perfect example where God used a bad person for his purpose; he also delivered his people out of Egypt. Sin can be forgiven, but always has its consequences. The Israelites were slow learners and we read their story and make the same mistakes.
<o:p></o:p>


funny how its easy to justify the "bad" stuff when it comes from our own book, but also to point to the same "bad" from the "other" book as the whole basis for their religion.
 
Top