D
dems4me
Guest
I don't think soo. I think they like dying for their cause because it makes them a martyer (sp?) or something.:shrug:
Bush strikes back! Finally sets his sights on Kerry.
- Thread starter sleuth
- Start date
I don't think soo. I think they like dying for their cause because it makes them a martyer (sp?) or something.:shrug:
D
dems4me
Guest
Originally posted by ylexot
Well, if that's their attitude and their cause is killing Americans, than maybe we should help send them to Allah.
I agree several years ago when I was learning about all of this -- USA should provide them the bombs.
D
dems4me
Guest
Originally posted by dems4me
I agree several years ago when I was learning about all of this -- USA should provide them the bombs.
OMG!!!! I can't believe this !!! Am I actually getting the last word in on our politics forum for today!!!
Nope, not quite yet anyway. I could repeat what most have said about the real fear, a do nothing President in office. That is how I see Kerry, more geared to debating an issue than taking action to prevent or respond. I also see it appropriate to gently remind folk of what took place on 9/11. Ignoring it would be a disservice to an issue that must be considered when selecting the next CINC. When attacked we must respond and thankfully we had a team in there that understood this. I'll be voting to extend their stay.Originally posted by dems4me
OMG!!!! I can't believe this !!! Am I actually getting the last word in on our politics forum for today!!!
Larry Gude
Strung Out
Damn Vrai...
..yah beat me to it.
No. Hell no. Killing ALL of them will do the trick however. There is also a tipping point where enough of them are killed that they will sue for peace. They will surrender...If we don't stop fighting back.
Don't you respect them at all? They declared war on us. They mean to do us in. I take them at their word. Their army is peopled with soldiers who will die to kill you and me and our families and our freedom and everything we stand for. You wanna reason with that???
You wanna pretend that somehow they suddenly started attacking us when W took office?
The Viet Cong were on the verge of collapse after the Tet offensive. They were saved and sustained by domestic opinion in the US, led by Fonda and Kerry and many others.
Everyone knows how to beat us.
We can argue Viet Nam. It was a foreign nation, now firmly communist.
How in Gods name there is any argument about the issue when it is just us amazes me. Simply amazes me.
..yah beat me to it.
No. Hell no. Killing ALL of them will do the trick however. There is also a tipping point where enough of them are killed that they will sue for peace. They will surrender...If we don't stop fighting back.
Don't you respect them at all? They declared war on us. They mean to do us in. I take them at their word. Their army is peopled with soldiers who will die to kill you and me and our families and our freedom and everything we stand for. You wanna reason with that???
You wanna pretend that somehow they suddenly started attacking us when W took office?
The Viet Cong were on the verge of collapse after the Tet offensive. They were saved and sustained by domestic opinion in the US, led by Fonda and Kerry and many others.
Everyone knows how to beat us.
We can argue Viet Nam. It was a foreign nation, now firmly communist.
How in Gods name there is any argument about the issue when it is just us amazes me. Simply amazes me.
D
dems4me
Guest
Just a dem shooting for the last word - which never seems to happen unless you are watching the democratic national debate.
Well now that thats out of the way I feel obligated to make a point. I think we need to get rid of the head of the CIA Mr. Tenant -- what good has he done?
1) There was 9/11 and still no Osama Bin Forgotten;
2) The anthrax mailer is still not caught;
3) We had snippers and they had us looking for a white guy in a white van;
4) He said we'd catch Saddam with WMDs they were all over the place (a whopping 4 stock piles from satelite images);
5) He told shrub Saddam was getting weapons from Nigeria; and
6) We still have no clue about the whole ricin scare.
Its freightening that he still maintains his position -- these are not just little mistakes folks. A few months ago it was mentioned on one of the political shows that he was still in office because he had "something" over the White House -- that was the only thing the political pundants could think of. Could it had been some 9/11 warnings that were ignored so they could continue their quest for oil in Iraq? Quite frankly I wasn't losing sleep over Saddam - it was Osama Bin Forgotten.
Then, only after catching Saddam, they send their speciality team that found Saddam to go look for Bin Forgotten. Why wasn't it the other way around.
In conclusion, I can name more where Tennet has not been up to speed on issues, but these are just the big issues that come to mind. Who would have appointed such a screw up?
Pete
Repete
#2,3 and 6 are FBI issues. The CIA does not do work in the country. But I agree, IF Tennet had the toold to work with and didn't use them wisely. All I heard after 9/11 was how we had gutted our CIA and intel communities in the last decade. If the man was reduced to sitting in his office with a Ouiji board and a black light it wasn't really his fault.Originally posted by dems4me
Just a dem shooting for the last word - which never seems to happen unless you are watching the democratic national debate.
Well now that thats out of the way I feel obligated to make a point. I think we need to get rid of the head of the CIA Mr. Tenant -- what good has he done?
1) There was 9/11 and still no Osama Bin Forgotten;
2) The anthrax mailer is still not caught;
3) We had snippers and they had us looking for a white guy in a white van;
4) He said we'd catch Saddam with WMDs they were all over the place (a whopping 4 stock piles from satelite images);
5) He told shrub Saddam was getting weapons from Nigeria; and
6) We still have no clue about the whole ricin scare.
Its freightening that he still maintains his position -- these are not just little mistakes folks. A few months ago it was mentioned on one of the political shows that he was still in office because he had "something" over the White House -- that was the only thing the political pundants could think of. Could it had been some 9/11 warnings that were ignored so they could continue their quest for oil in Iraq? Quite frankly I wasn't losing sleep over Saddam - it was Osama Bin Forgotten.
Then, only after catching Saddam, they send their speciality team that found Saddam to go look for Bin Forgotten. Why wasn't it the other way around.
In conclusion, I can name more where Tennet has not been up to speed on issues, but these are just the big issues that come to mind. Who would have appointed such a screw up?
D
dems4me
Guest
eitherway Pete -- lots of mistakes whether CIA or FBI. You can't deny that!!
SmallTown
Football season!
As a response to the whole 9/11 pics in the bush's campaign stuff, that is just wrong. Unless he was one of the people who flew the planes in to the buildings, or was there himself pulling out survivors or victims, it has no place in the campaign ads. If he wants to show footage of what HE has done, feel free to ait the many clips of us ripping apart afghanistan, or parading saddam hussein around. Those are two items that represent what he has done with respect to the 9/11 tragedies. Using the pics he did to help his campaign is just wrong.
What worries me is that Bush must be pretty nervous of Kerry, if he is already using such tactics. As much as I dislike Bush, Kerry just simply scares the sh!t out of me.
What worries me is that Bush must be pretty nervous of Kerry, if he is already using such tactics. As much as I dislike Bush, Kerry just simply scares the sh!t out of me.
F
Flo
Guest
I believe it is very relevant that 9/11 pics be in the campaign.
Did Clinton visit after the bombing of the World Trade Center in 1993? If it was Clinton in office or another democrat, would you have felt the same way if they had of done such campaign ads? Don't remember seeing Clinton being compassionate in the days afterward, so I guess they couldn't have done such an ad. Maybe he should have stood on the USS Cole in October, 2000 and showed some compassion. I believe I remember seeing him at a podium with condolences, but nothing that struck me as being compassionate and going after the terrorists that struck then. 9/11 may not have happened if he had of fought back in 1993. I never remember seeing Clinton compassionate for anything, except for saving his butt after getting a bj from Monica.
I am just tired of hearing the democrats whining!
And yes, Kerry should scare the sh!t out of you and everyone concerned for Americas freedom, because as of yet Kerry hasn't given us any descreet plans he would have to combat terrorism. Anything he has voiced is a bunch of mumbo/jumbo crap.
Last edited by a moderator:
D
dems4me
Guest
Thank you
Come over to the dem side of life Pete -- the only thing you won't like is our mascot -- how is it btw that we got a jackazz for a mascot????
Last edited by a moderator:
D
dems4me
Guest
I agree with you 100% just like when he used the pictures of him on Air Force 1 on 9/11 and donated the money to the RNC in April of 2002.
D
dems4me
Guest
That's because it would just be taken out of context and used against him. He keeps his cards close to his vest. Nothing wrong with that.
D
dems4me
Guest
And that was?????
ceo_pte
New Member
The bottom line is the only way Kerry could do anything for this country is by raising taxes again. That's the only way dems know how to balance the budget. They don't have the balls to fix the problem(too many gov. programs, inefficient, waste, etc.) they would rather tax the people, claim they fixed the problem then turn the office over to someone else and let them deal with the downside of raising taxes.
F
Flo
Guest
Originally posted by dems4me
That's because it would just be taken out of context and used against him. He keeps his cards close to his vest. Nothing wrong with that.
I personally don't want someone in office that can't speak up for what he believes in. When he does, he is wishy-washy, or dodges the subject. Not that all politicians don't lie, but he irks me trying to be on both sides of the fence; i.e. flip-floppy.