Peter Forsberg
New Member
There is a great book I suggest you read. It's called hockey for dummies.WTF?
Goalie interference and THEY get a shot?
Just gave the game away.
There is a great book I suggest you read. It's called hockey for dummies.WTF?
Goalie interference and THEY get a shot?
Just gave the game away.
Ohg, I'm afraid it's not winnable at this point.
The damn officials tonight did anything they could to ensure a Philidelphia victory.
you know what!!!! Im not even going to read the last 10 pages. Cause I know Kerad is talking trash and the rest of the Caps fans have no idea what the hell they are talking about.
First off... The refs have sucked for the whole series. both teams got away with a lot of shit!!!
All I have to say is Ovechkunt better wake up, or the series is going to be over quick
Semin can put a shoot on net he is missing the entire net every shot.
...tell you what I saw; a bunch of lose play and very bad turnovers by the Caps in an otherwise good intensity well paced and exciting game. As for the refs, they gave the 3rd goal to us. That was text book high stick. No goal.
They even went to toronto, who also looks at the replays and toronto said it was a goal...
that tripping call was bull#### that resulted in a penalty shot... It should have been hooking 2 minute minor... simple as that...
He was clearly on a breakaway...it was the proper call.
you are a freaking retard... if you think he had a "breakaway" he had a step i dont consider that a breakaway at all by any means... secondly it shouldnt have been a penalty shot..
In cases where a player is fouled from behind (Rule 91(b)), four criteria must be met in order for the Referee to award a penalty shot:
1. The infraction must have taken place in the opponent's half of the ice, i.e. over the center red line.
2. The infraction must have been committed from behind.
3. The player in possession and control (or, in the judgment of the Referee, clearly would have obtained possession and control of the puck) must have been denied a reasonable chance to score.
(NOTE) The fact that he got a shot off does not automatically eliminate this play from the penalty shot consideration criteria. If the foul was from behind and he was denied a "more" reasonable scoring opportunity due to the foul, then the penalty shot should be awarded.
4. The player in possession and control (or, in the judgment of the Referee, clearly would have obtained possession and control of the puck) must have had no opposing player between himself and the goalkeeper.
that tripping call was bull#### that resulted in a penalty shot... It should have been hooking 2 minute minor... simple as that...
Why would it be a hooking call, when it was tripping????
you obviously aint a caps fan LMFAO must be a pens or flyers fan...
my statement was as TIGHT as the game was being called that shouldnt have been a PS... simple as that... the refs are blowing goat in this game... rather sad..
you obviously aint a caps fan LMFAO must be a pens or flyers fan...
my statement was as TIGHT as the game was being called that shouldnt have been a PS... simple as that... the refs are blowing goat in this game... rather sad..
that tripping call was bull#### that resulted in a penalty shot... It should have been hooking 2 minute minor... simple as that...
intinally it was a hook until he triped him... wouldnt call double minor..