DeGeneres in doghouse

nhboy

Ubi bene ibi patria
"Ellen DeGeneres is in the doghouse with a pet rescue agency after giving a pooch away to her hairdresser because it didn't get along with her cats.

The talk show hostess and her partner Portia de Rossi adopted Iggy, a Brussels Griffon mix, on Sept. 20. But when things didn't work out, DeGeneres gave the dog to her hairdresser."
ABC News: DeGeneres in Doghouse With Pet Agency
 

Dupontster

Would THIS face lie?
I am ot at all a fan of DeGeneres but I think she was just trying to find a good home for the dog....Granted, she didn't read the contract but it's kind of sad for the little girls that have become attached to the dog...
 

vraiblonde

Board Mommy
PREMO Member
Patron
I will probably never adopt a pet because of nonsense like this.

Agreed.

Not all rescues are like this, but enough of them are that I wouldn't want to deal with their silliness. They can keep their animals for all I care - breeders don't give you such a hard time.
 

hammishsqueak

We're all mad here.
"Ellen DeGeneres is in the doghouse with a pet rescue agency after giving a pooch away to her hairdresser because it didn't get along with her cats.

The talk show hostess and her partner Portia de Rossi adopted Iggy, a Brussels Griffon mix, on Sept. 20. But when things didn't work out, DeGeneres gave the dog to her hairdresser."
ABC News: DeGeneres in Doghouse With Pet Agency

:burning: Won't they even consider letting the hairdresser's family keep the dog? Yeah, Ellen made a mistake and violated the contract, but the last time I checked the goal of rescues were to find the animal a good home! I don't see why they're so damn inflexible in a situation where the animal is being treated well.
 

nhboy

Ubi bene ibi patria
:burning: Won't they even consider letting the hairdresser's family keep the dog? Yeah, Ellen made a mistake and violated the contract, but the last time I checked the goal of rescues were to find the animal a good home! I don't see why they're so damn inflexible in a situation where the animal is being treated well.

This may be just a case of bureaucracy vs common sense.
 

poster

New Member
:burning: Won't they even consider letting the hairdresser's family keep the dog? Yeah, Ellen made a mistake and violated the contract, but the last time I checked the goal of rescues were to find the animal a good home! I don't see why they're so damn inflexible in a situation where the animal is being treated well.

A friend of mine adopted a dog that didn't work out, because of new babies in the house - the dog didn't like and was agressive, she returned the dog as contracted. They pretty much made her feel like she was an evil irresponsible person. She'll never adopt a rescue again.

The policies should be changed to accomodate those who are able to find alternate homes for the animals, it could be stipulated that the new owners would be subject to inspection just as the first individual was. The object is to find a good home for the animal, not make the owners feel like idiots!!
 

hammishsqueak

We're all mad here.
A friend of mine adopted a dog that didn't work out, because of new babies in the house - the dog didn't like and was agressive, she returned the dog as contracted. They pretty much made her feel like she was an evil irresponsible person. She'll never adopt a rescue again.

The policies should be changed to accomodate those who are able to find alternate homes for the animals, it could be stipulated that the new owners would be subject to inspection just as the first individual was. The object is to find a good home for the animal, not make the owners feel like idiots!!

Where did they adopt from (PM me if you don't want to say)? There needs to be a sense of realism in animal adoptions- sometimes the pets are just incompatible with others animals and it is often indeterminable. I can understand the disappointment and frustration on the part of the rescue agency, but yeah, they definitely need a change of policy!
 
R

RadioPatrol

Guest
common sense, animals get better care and treatment than children ...........
 

Geek

New Member
If this rescue handled this right they could educate about pet overpopulation. Rescues need good press, not this stubborn woman with unreasonable standards.
 

Bann

Doris Day meets Lady Gaga
PREMO Member
I will probably never adopt a pet because of nonsense like this.

Agreed.

Not all rescues are like this, but enough of them are that I wouldn't want to deal with their silliness. They can keep their animals for all I care - breeders don't give you such a hard time.

Too bad agencies do not act so swiftly when it's children at risk.

common sense, animals get better care and treatment than children ...........

If this rescue handled this right they could educate about pet overpopulation. Rescues need good press, not this stubborn woman with unreasonable standards.



:yay: I agree
 

Bann

Doris Day meets Lady Gaga
PREMO Member
This may be just a case of bureaucracy vs common sense.

I've dealt with a couple of rescues in the past, and I ended up not adopting from them due to (some of) their ridiculous requirements.

Granted, NOT all rescues are like this, and not all people are acceptable candidates to adopt. Still, in my experience, SOME of the people affiliated with rescues I have dealt with had unusally inflated opinions of their own importance and missions.

I know that isn't the answer to animal overpopulation.

*I didn't say all - I said some. JMO
 

BS Gal

Voted Nicest in 08
I started to fill out an application for SMAWL but soon became overwhelmed with the amount of information they wanted. For that reason, I will not adopt from them.
 

Nanny Pam

************
This is all a bunch of :bs:

Give the dog back to those little girls.
The action taken by this rescue organization is hurting all rescues.

Idiots.
:rolleyes:
 

mAlice

professional daydreamer
The action taken by this rescue organization is hurting all rescues.

Idiots.
:rolleyes:

Actually, many rescue organizations are hurting themselves.
As Bann stated so eloquently "inflated opinions of their own importance and missions". They're pushing people away.
 
Top