DNC - Coup Against Biden - So Much For Will Of The People

Kyle

Beloved Misanthrope
PREMO Member
I don’t know of anyone whining other than the GOP, Harris was on the ticket as VP that folks voted for. Biden decides not to run, ergo Harris become the nominee.

Pretty cut and dry
And that's what she said.

Democrats shut up and do what they are told.

Did you miss that?
 

Ken King

A little rusty but not crusty
PREMO Member
I don’t know of anyone whining other than the GOP, Harris was on the ticket as VP that folks voted for. Biden decides not to run, ergo Harris become the nominee.

Pretty cut and dry
Biden dropping out after securing the requisite delegates does not automatically make them "bound" to Harris simply because of his endorsement. Biden effectively "unbound" them and they can vote for whomever they desire at the convention.
 

Hijinx

Well-Known Member
I don't believe that Joe Biden was the will of the people. They voted for him because the rest dropped out, because the party told them to.

The party said Joe Biden will be our candidate and the rest did what they were told to do.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BOP

Chopticon64

Well-Known Member
I don't believe that Joe Biden was the will of the people. They voted for him because the rest dropped out, because the party told them to.

The party said Joe Biden will be our candidate and the rest did what they were told to do.
Like Hillary was the will of the people?

Last true president who won the primary easily and the popular and electoral college was Obama

You folks just adored him
 

SamSpade

Well-Known Member
PREMO Member
Biden was being urged to REPLACE Harris as VP as early as two years ago - as I understand it - in the primary you do NOT vote for a ticket - no one else running has a named VP. VP is named at the nomination. As it stands, had Joe NOT dropped out, he could just as easily named ANYONE else.

We've had years where a previous VP ran against their President, in the primary. You don't vote for a ticket, you vote for a person. I have never heard of a person designating a VP in a primary who isn't an incumbent.

Gerry Ford had Rockefeller as HIS VP - but come the convention - he picked Bob Dole. Just because someone was VP - doesn't put them on the ticket.

All this is pointless as Democrats just make sht up as they go along.
 

herb749

Well-Known Member
Has it occurred to anyone that if the Democratic Party believed that Biden COULD be removed from office via the 25th Amendment - presumably on the grounds of mental fitness -

But they're ok with him REMAINING in the office, for the next five months?

No, it's not the same thought - THEY coerced him with the threat of removal from office, and you ONLY deduce that they thought they could DO it - make the case that he is not mentally FIT to continue ---

But once they got their concession from him, they are cool to KEEP him in there?

This says one thing very clear to me - NOT that they're ok with a demented old man running the country - that's insane - but that he has NEVER been running the country.


I believe they want to avoid any risk involving Harris. Having her step in for Biden gives voters a look of what she's like. One press conference would prove the dolt she is. They just need her elected and the Obama people do the rest.
 

vraiblonde

Board Mommy
PREMO Member
Patron
Biden was being urged to REPLACE Harris as VP as early as two years ago - as I understand it - in the primary you do NOT vote for a ticket - no one else running has a named VP. VP is named at the nomination. As it stands, had Joe NOT dropped out, he could just as easily named ANYONE else.

We've had years where a previous VP ran against their President, in the primary. You don't vote for a ticket, you vote for a person. I have never heard of a person designating a VP in a primary who isn't an incumbent.

Gerry Ford had Rockefeller as HIS VP - but come the convention - he picked Bob Dole. Just because someone was VP - doesn't put them on the ticket.

All this is pointless as Democrats just make sht up as they go along.

You act like these bots are supposed to know how elections work.

And I too recall that it wasn't that long ago Gropes was being urged to ditch Kamala for 2024 because she was weak and a drain on the administration. But that was 5 minutes ago - Dembots have their instructions and now she's the Second Coming.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BOP

Chopticon64

Well-Known Member
You act like these bots are supposed to know how elections work.

And I too recall that it wasn't that long ago Gropes was being urged to ditch Kamala for 2024 because she was weak and a drain on the administration. But that was 5 minutes ago - Dembots have their instructions and now she's the Second Coming.
Well then, she should be the easiest candidate in history to beat.

You’ve been fed a steady diet of misinformation, Kamala has always been a rock star, beloved among dems, I remember of no movement in the party to oust her.

No one saying she should step aside, be replaced, nothing.

Who told you this? Did you know Joe Biden? Did he tell you?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: BOP

vraiblonde

Board Mommy
PREMO Member
Patron
Well then, she should be the easiest candidate in history to beat.

Except for the part where your masters could run a chia pet and you'd all be, "Oh, rock star!! And look at those sneakers!"

You’ve been fed a steady diet of misinformation, Kamala has always been a rock star, beloved among dems, I remember of no movement in the party to oust her.

Well, you didn't know about BLM being angry about her, either, so pardon me if I don't exactly hold you up as the most informed and attentive person in the world.
 

SamSpade

Well-Known Member
PREMO Member
You act like these bots are supposed to know how elections work.

And I too recall that it wasn't that long ago Gropes was being urged to ditch Kamala for 2024 because she was weak and a drain on the administration. But that was 5 minutes ago - Dembots have their instructions and now she's the Second Coming.

The past was alterable. The past never had been altered. Oceania was at war with Eastasia. Oceania had always been at war with Eastasia.


Kamala was Border Czar. Kamala was put in charge of the border. Kamala was NEVER Border Czar.
Kamala played a crucial part in the withdrawal from Afghanistan. Kamala had NO part in the withdrawal from Afghanistan.
Kamala had a very low approval rating from both parties and independents. Kamala had the highest approval rating.


This is fun. How many more can you think of?
 

somdwatch

Well-Known Member
Well then, she should be the easiest candidate in history to beat.

You’ve been fed a steady diet of misinformation, Kamala has always been a rock star, beloved among dems, I remember of no movement in the party to oust her.

No one saying she should step aside, be replaced, nothing.

Who told you this? Did you know Joe Biden? Did he tell you?
Damn, you shot gunned the Kool-Aid from the fire house didn't you?
 

stgislander

Well-Known Member
PREMO Member
Some people seem surprised that Obama was in on the coup.
I do not understand their surprise. Obama has been running this country for the last 4 years.
He has had 3 terms and if Kamala should win he will get his 4th.
The funny part is that Obama thought he had everything planned out, and then Joe made the biggest FU possible by coming out and endorsing Kamala. Before Obama could reign things in, state delegates were lining up behind Kamala.
 
Top