This is the most insane cope I have ever heard for a woman prostituting herself ever ....
If a guy wants to take her on a date she ' evaluates ' his personality, his energy / vibes financial status ..... if he is ' OK ' enough, you will PAY her $ 2700 dollar rent FOR THE DATE, with NO Guarantee of anything intimate, you are paying $ 2700 dollars for a chance she will ' feel ' good vibes and fuc you at the end of the night
Almost 9 hours! I can't watch those when they're only 20 minutes. No way I can take listening to garden tools for that long.
I did watch it for a few minutes, however. That first 304 is a real pip, as my grandfather used to say.
You're starting to see this more and more on social media, where women are wanting to see bank statements, financial health statements, and most of all, wanting men to pay UP FRONT in either cash dollars and/or in necessities for them, their homes, their children, and whatnot.
Here's what I think: I feel like this is leading to a whole new area of contract law - in fact, a merger of contract law and family law.
You want a girlfriend? Here is a contract that sets forward the fees, length, terms and conditions, as well as limitations.
You want a wife? That costs extra.
I managed contracts for personnel services for the Navy for most of my career. I can't recall any exceptions, though there may have been one or two, but those were 5 year contracts that were renewable in a kind of mini recompete every year. Not a full-blown competition with RFPs and responses and so on, but nearly as much work. So basically, a provider of logistics and/or engineering and/or program management services won a 5-year contract, but at least in theory, they could lose the contract after year 1, year 2, and so on. I've seen it happen and have taken part in a couple of those.
In light of my experience, I've long viewed marriage as a contract between two people, with each contributing and receiving benefit from the marriage contract. As long as at least one party feels as though they are receiving at least a minimum "return" on the "investment" they make in the relationship, the marriage will last.
Given the fact that women initiate approximately 80% of divorces in this country, and the divorce rate is around 56%, AND with women citing "boredom" as a chief reason to end the relationship - as well as the fact that divorce tends to lead to a woman walking away with cash and prizes, as Joker puts it (since the judicial system is heavily weighted in favor of women), I have to question both what women are "investing" into the relationship, as well as what their expectations are as far as what they expect to derive from said relationship.
Some observers of such things have frequently noted that today's modern women see a relationship itself as "the prize." They have also remarked that women want the wedding, but are neither equipped for, or even desire the marriage. Additional, perhaps biologically driven - almost certainly, actually - they desire children, but are just as ill-equipped to raise them. In the same way, women get into the workforce - often right out of college - and suddenly they no longer want to work. And that's not just male and female observers saying so; it's women themselves.
They want to be strong, independent, make their own money, don't need no man, boss babe women - until the going gets hard - and all of a sudden, they're all "where are all the good men!?"
All the good men are off doing other things, complying with hundreds and hundreds of videos of women constantly telling men "we don't need you! Go away! Stop approaching us!"
So, men did, in highly statistically meaningful numbers, and now that a whole generation of women is losing its reproductive value as they age, the ordinary guys that women did not see when they were in their more fecund years are suddenly looking a lot better to women - but after years and years of being ignored or rejected in some really ugly, insulting ways (ask me how I know), those same women are looking for someone to start a family with and to provide for them and their spawn.
The problem is, and women tell on themselves in mass numbers, those exact same women will monkey branch on that guy; their hypergamous nature driving them to level up as far as providers.
That "I'm bored; I want a divorce" really means she found a guy who is at least a little more "exciting," and in theory, more capable as a provider and/or protector. In too many cases, that guy who is a 7-10 guy only wants one thing from her, and it's not a family - especially a pre-made one.
Carp...I better stop. I'm getting too fired up about this.
But yeah, marriage contracts. The Government is involved (heavily), they're enforceable as far as terms and conditions (as opposed to social media's nebulous "terms and conditions" or even the current system we're used to), and, done correctly, could give everyone what they want.
People might say "But BOP, what about love?"
What's love got to do with it?
Arranged marriages were the standard for many generations world-wide, and statistically, those seem to have a much better track record than what we've been dealing with for a much shorter time period. People actually fell in like, and even in love within the context of arranged marriages.
Within a contract marriage, both parties can theoretically get what they want.
