FINANCING the ENGAGEMENT RING...

Lugnut

I'm Rick James #####!
mv_princess said:
Why does it bother you what other people do with their money?

Just an observation, I don't think Qurious mentioned that this applied to anybody yet. She just asked for opinions on the concept of "financing an engagemnent ring."
 

mv_princess

mv = margaritaville
Lugnut said:
Just an observation, I don't think Qurious mentioned that this applied to anybody yet. She just asked for opinions on the concept of "financing an engagemnent ring."
Yeah but if two people are that much inlove, what is it to anyone else how they spend their money. I say go for it. Just because you pay for something over time, doesn't mean you are broke.
 
Toxick said:
Holy crap!


I have a house and a car I can't afford!!!
If you stopped getting additional income at this point in your life, could you afford to pay off the loans...:shrug:
 

Lugnut

I'm Rick James #####!
mv_princess said:
Yeah but if two people are that much inlove, what is it to anyone else how they spend their money. I say go for it. Just because you pay for something over time, doesn't mean you are broke.

I agree that just because you take a loan out for something doesn't mean your broke.

Anyhow, my point was that the discussion isn't about two people. It's about the concept of financing a piece of jewlery.

Qurious correct me if I'm off base here. :flowers:
 

Bustem' Down

Give Peas a Chance
Qurious said:
Uhhhhhhhhhhh No.


Your thoughts? :popcorn:
It would depend on the girl too. I know some high maint. girls that would expect no less than a full carat for an engagment ring. Most people would have to finance that.
 

bresamil

wandering aimlessly
kwillia said:
If you stopped getting additional income at this point in your life, could you afford to pay off the loans...:shrug:
If I stopped getting additional income at this point in my life, I couldn't afford gas or groceries. :lol:
 

itsbob

I bowl overhand
Qurious said:
who said it bothered me? Its a topic of discussion....
Agreed that its nobody's business what another person does with their money, BUT I also agree that it's silly for a newly married couple to start out their new lives in debt.

5- 10k for a ring.. 5 - 20k for the wedding ceremony, another few thousand for the honeymoon. The three combined could add up to more than $500 or even a $1000 a month in payments for the first 4 - 10 years of their lives together, another stressor on the marriage.

It's their money, but they would be wise to learn from other's mistakes.

A house is an investment, and probably the only thing worth financing (how can you save $300 - 400,000 while paying rent too?) no matter what you do, buy or rent, you are still going to be outlaying money for a place to live so it may as well be YOUR place.

Cars are so expensive you have no choice but to finance/ lease, unless you buy a curbstone for a couple grand that you can pay cash for.

Lastly who made the "rule" about the cost of the engagment ring? What is it now, twice your monthly income? The JEWELRY stores, they just want your money.

I've been paying for financial miscalulations for the last four years (since I started working here) and look back and say.. "WTH was I thinking!!?" for some decisions I've made, and things I've gone in debt for.

The one thing I don't regret going in debt for is education. Cheap rates, and payoff, even monthy, is way more than I pay out in payments.
 
Last edited:

Toxick

Splat
Speedy70 said:
Maybe you should read the whole thread. :duh:





Fine - you made exceptions for a house and a car becuase they're "necessities", but, says I, it's very easy to rent an apartment and pay cash (or check or money order) every month, or get a rental car for monthly cash (or check or money order), or simply take the bus for a buck. So maybe a mortgage and car payment are not so much necessities after all.

Point being, if you can afford the monthly bills, you can afford the ring.

In much the same way as you can afford your credit-cards, house, car, plasma screen TV, computer, personal loans or mail-order bride.
 

Qurious

Im On 1.
Toxick said:
Holy crap!


I have a house and a car I can't afford!!!

They totally aren't the same thing.

A woman doesn't need a big rock when its time for you to propose....thats something you want to give her for the whole "bragging, yeah this is my future wife" type effect. A $100 gold band would suffice....something you wouldn't have to finance!

Finance your needs, not your wants.

Fools paying major interest on materialistic items all for "show".....
 

mv_princess

mv = margaritaville
Qurious said:
They totally aren't the same thing.

A woman doesn't need a big rock when its time for you to propose....thats something you want to give her for the whole "bragging, yeah this is my future wife" type effect. A $100 gold band would suffice....something you wouldn't have to finance!

Finance your needs, not your wants.

Fools paying major interest on materialistic items all for "show".....
And a car and a house could be considered materialistic and items for "show".

It's all a personal view.
I guess I stilll don't see what the problem is.
 

Nickel

curiouser and curiouser
itsbob said:
Lastly who made the "rule" about the cost of the engagment ring? What is it now, twice your monthly income? The JEWELRY stores, they just want your money.
I think that's a stupid rule, there's NO way you'd catch me with a ring on my finger that cost twice D's monthly salary. Too much flash for my taste. I can see financing some things...cars, homes, large improvements to your home, but I just can't see financing jewelry, or a vacation (as was previously mentioned in the thread). That's me though, everyone else can do whatever they want. :shrug:
 
bresamil said:
If I stopped getting additional income at this point in my life, I couldn't afford gas or groceries. :lol:
Agreed! And that is exactly the point! Financing is a necessary evil that allows us to borrow on our future income and it comes at a price. Until something is paid in full, we really don't own it. And if something always has a cost, such as our home/property (yearly taxes) we never really own it, but are just "renting it" from someone else (in this case, the government).
 

Qurious

Im On 1.
mv_princess said:
And a car and a house could be considered materialistic and items for "show".

It's all a personal view.
I guess I stilll don't see what the problem is.


Who in the blue hell is considering a house and a car something someone has for "show"

come on now :rolleyes:
 

mv_princess

mv = margaritaville
Qurious said:
Who in the blue hell is considering a house and a car something someone has for "show"

come on now :rolleyes:
You have to have that fancy car, with all the nice stuff.

You have to have that big house.

why not get an older car that you have the cash for, or a small house that you can pay off. Because you really don't need anything bigger.
 

sockgirl77

Well-Known Member
Qurious said:
Who in the blue hell is considering a house and a car something someone has for "show"

come on now :rolleyes:
I picked my house because it was pretty. I could have had a shack for alot less. :shrug:
 
Top