Hold on people...
Tonio said:
Sadly, Larry was right--the prosecution had no case. What a disappointment.
This may be a reach, but do you suppose that other pedophiles will look at MJ's acquittal and think that they're invincible from the law?
...why are we assuming that MJ actually had sex with young boys?
Bill Clinton had his blue dress. OJ had blood everywhere.
If MJ actually had sex with any boy, especially the boys whose parents and prosecutors believed so strongly that there was sexual relations with MJ that they brought suit, where's the DNA? Where's the examination of the boy from a doctor at a hospital stating that something had happened?
Serial murderers and sexual predators and child molestors are not of the 'one and done' variety.
Anyone read murder mysteries? Do I need to get graphic? How hard would it have been to get some evidence? A pubic hair perhaps? See where this is going?
There is NO forensic evidence that Jackson had sex with any of these kids and I submit for your opinion that it just may be that Jackson is INNOCENT.
Not just aquited, innocent.
That does not make him 'normal' or healthy or anything but he may have just laid there in bed with other young kids doing young kid things; telling stories, day dreaming, being kids.
I think the guy is hyper ####ed up and where is it written that a 46 year old is incapable of being around kids and actully acting that age?
In any event, if he actually ever had sex with some kid there would be EVIDENCE. Not accusations from gold diggers, disgruntled employees or other assorted freaks, EVIDENCE.
Thoughts?