Fox News Reporting They Have A Verdict!!

Nickel

Nickel

curiouser and curiouser
RoseRed said:
There was also the McMartin case in SoCal in 1984 or thereabouts.
Click to expand...
That's on the link I just posted also. I remember when all of that was going on (at least in NC), my mother made a huge point about what was okay and what wasn't, and I think that's a part of why I'm so standoffish around people I don't know, and get weirded out by people very easily, but at least I wasn't molested as a child. :shrug:
 
RoseRed

RoseRed

American Beauty
PREMO Member
Nickel said:
That's on the link I just posted also. I remember when all of that was going on (at least in NC), my mother made a huge point about what was okay and what wasn't, and I think that's a part of why I'm so standoffish around people I don't know, and get weirded out by people very easily, but at least I wasn't molested as a child. :shrug:
Click to expand...

I didn't cleek the link. :blushing:

At the time I was fairly fresh out of high school and worked at two different day care facilities and that was one of the main reasons I left it, I didn't want to be falsly accused of anything of that magnitude.
 
C

canuk woman

Guest
Larry Gude said:
...you've just been aquited of buggering 13 years olds. What are you gonna do now?"


MJ: "I'm going to Disney Land!"
Click to expand...


YAY!!! HE'S NOT GOING TO JAIL HE'S NOT GOING TO JAIL and now i'm gonna block my karma
 
Larry Gude

Larry Gude

Strung Out
I wasn't sure because in this case....

BadGirl said:
Sorry. I meant "accused".
Click to expand...

...the MJ case, I think the accusers were off their rockers. The charges read like they were trying to prove that MJ was some sort of organized mobster.
 
C

canuk woman

Guest
Larry Gude said:
...the MJ case, I think the accusers were off their rockers. The charges read like they were trying to prove that MJ was some sort of organized mobster.
Click to expand...

i hope that now the family gets charged for extorting money from celebrities and lying in a courtroom and under oath
 
vraiblonde

vraiblonde

Board Mommy
PREMO Member
Patron
We know damn well how the jury came to its decision: Michael Jackson is Michael Jackson and the plaintiffs were dirtbags.

Where did all that porn come from?

How about the testimony of all those household employees that said they saw MJ groping these boys?

It's easy to say, "Hey - if those parents want to feed their kids to Michael Jackson, who are we to argue?" And it's easy to think that they got paid well for the use of their sons. But the evidence was there. The testimony was there. And the nuttiness of the parents shouldn't have been a factor in the verdict.

It's OJ all over again. Bill Clinton all over again. Don't try the defendent - try the victim instead because they're weak and powerless and can't do anything about it.

So much for "justice for all".
 
C

canuk woman

Guest
vraiblonde said:
We know damn well how the jury came to its decision: Michael Jackson is Michael Jackson and the plaintiffs were dirtbags.

Where did all that porn come from?

How about the testimony of all those household employees that said they saw MJ groping these boys?

It's easy to say, "Hey - if those parents want to feed their kids to Michael Jackson, who are we to argue?" And it's easy to think that they got paid well for the use of their sons. But the evidence was there. The testimony was there. And the nuttiness of the parents shouldn't have been a factor in the verdict.

It's OJ all over again. Bill Clinton all over again. Don't try the defendent - try the victim instead because they're weak and powerless and can't do anything about it.

So much for "justice for all".
Click to expand...

yep definatly oj now michael jackson joins the "acquitted celebrities club" with oj and robert blake and...did i miss someone?
 
donbarzini

donbarzini

Well-Known Member
Nickel said:
I really don't know what, if anything happened with Michael Jackson, although I believe that his intentions were not purely innocent, unless he is mentally retarded or something. I recall a local story when I was growing up (not here, and I was young, so I might have some of the facts skewed), about a group of day care workers that molested the children in their charge for a period of time, and the parents found out by chance after it had been happening for awhile...the workers were telling the children that their parents wouldn't love them anymore, or wouldn't believe them, and they were wicked children, etc etc...basically scared them into keeping quiet. Like I said, I don't know what happened with MJ, but I do know that children, especially the type of children he had in and out of there, are very vulnerable.
Click to expand...


That happened in Massachusetts. I believe their name was Amerault
 
Tonio

Tonio

Asperger's Poster Child
Toxick said:
He's a freakish mess
Click to expand...
That's part of my point. Whether MJ is guilty or innocent, I think he has no business being around kids in the first place. He's too mentally unstable. That wouldn't be enough to convince a judge to issue a restraining order, but it should certainly be enough to convince any sane parents to keep their kids the hell away from him.
 
Last edited:
Nickel

Nickel

curiouser and curiouser
donbarzini said:
That happened in Massachusetts. I believe their name was Amerault
Click to expand...
Supposedly it happened a lot in the 80s, the one I'm referring to was in Edenton, NC, an hour from where I grew up. After researching it a little I've learned that it was most likely "made up", the investigators planted ideas in the children's heads.
 
Bustem' Down

Bustem' Down

Give Peas a Chance
vraiblonde said:
We know damn well how the jury came to its decision: Michael Jackson is Michael Jackson and the plaintiffs were dirtbags.

Where did all that porn come from?

How about the testimony of all those household employees that said they saw MJ groping these boys?

It's easy to say, "Hey - if those parents want to feed their kids to Michael Jackson, who are we to argue?" And it's easy to think that they got paid well for the use of their sons. But the evidence was there. The testimony was there. And the nuttiness of the parents shouldn't have been a factor in the verdict.

It's OJ all over again. Bill Clinton all over again. Don't try the defendent - try the victim instead because they're weak and powerless and can't do anything about it.

So much for "justice for all".
Click to expand...
I'd like to see a little more of the defense. They must have had something good. All they ever put on the news was the prosecutions case so it sounds like he's guilty.
 
dustin

dustin

UAIOE
I think the whole trial, everything, is a ploy for Michael to gain more popularity....at least in his twisted mind....he comes out with this documentary purposefully...knowing that dude would try to make a case out of it....just so he could get back on the headlines.

:conspiracytheory:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top