Abc, I’m not used to dealing with you, but I’m used to people like Midnight stirring up a bunch of #### and spouting off crap he is obvious in conflict with; even within himself. He even replied after I posted the law (post 319) indicating that an FFL ‘CAN’ release, but they don’t have to (posts 320 and 327)
Here is the law. The law does not REQUIRE FFLs to release anything to anyone. It is at the FFL’s discretion. I provided an article previous to that stating that MSP are discouraging the practice. I bought my AR online and transferred to my FFL prior to knowing that this provision existed. I was stuck and could nothing about it but wait.
Maryland State Police > Organization > Support Services Bureau > Licensing Division
Your FFL may be cooperating today, but it will only take a couple of recalls to change that. They ARE NOT required to release that firearm to you if they feel it would be more counterproductive to do so.
Why would this specific law require FFLs to release anything to anyone? That's what someone does when they sell you something, they give it to you, except to the extent they are prevented from doing so by special circumstances. This specific law isn't granting FFL's permission to release firearms, it is prohibiting them from doing so under specific circumstances (e.g. for a specific period of time)
You pay someone money, they give you the merchandise. Sometimes it's on order, so they have to wait until it comes in to give it to you. When it comes to regulated firearms, there's a special law that prohibits them from giving it to you for 7 days (or until a 'not disapproved' application is returned, whichever is shorter). That's all the law prevents (unless a disapproved application is returned within 7 days). After that, you return to the general nature of the ubiquitous merchant-consumer transaction. There's nothing prohibiting the FFL from giving you the merchandise you paid them for, so they should give it to you. They aren't doing anything wrong in giving it to you, even if it turns out later that the MSP disapproves the application (and actually, as the law is written, I don't think the MSP is allowed to disapprove an application after 7 days - if it's going to disapprove the application, it is required to inform the FFL within 7 days; not that the MSP feels bound by a plain reading of the law).
I won't go so far as to say someone could successfully sue an FFL to force them to release a firearm after 7 days, but they should be able to unless the FFL made it clear when the deal was made that they were going to wait however long it took to get a 'not disapproved' back. And I surely wouldn't suggest that people should sue their FFL's over this issue. I understand why FFL's might fear (improper) repercussions from the MSP and thus be overly cautious. But I will go so far as to say that I wouldn't do business with an FFL unless they assured me that they would release my firearm to me when they were allowed to - i.e. after 7 days. That's what I expect from people I buy stuff from. I pay them money, they give me the merchandise, unless there's some reason they can't (e.g. they had to special order it) or some reason I don't want it yet.