Grumpy
Well-Known Member
Him accusing Sam Spade, of all people, of defending this guy was just the dizzy limit. That's such a reach and stretch that I'll be surprised if he didn't permanently injure himself.
Had me laffing my azz off
Him accusing Sam Spade, of all people, of defending this guy was just the dizzy limit. That's such a reach and stretch that I'll be surprised if he didn't permanently injure himself.
That’s what you assumed. No where in that post does it say anything if the sort.No, stupid. He said what the guy's lawyer is using the defense.
I made a statement, I never claimed it was MY Opinion dumb ass
I thought your post was clear. But, as we know, MR and the rest of the zombieprog army cannot process communication.
That’s what you assumed. No where in that post does it say anything if the sort.
they see what the want to see ...
... and I made no indication that it’s not my opinion.
You are an idiot. If you don’t take that as my opinion you are a complete moron.and you did not state it WAS Your Opinion Either ... I know Comprehension is Difficult for you, but that cuts both ways
Just because you're stupid doesn't mean everybody is.
From one account I read, they had already smashed through his rear window with bats and he claims someone was approaching him with a gun.
.
And if trump said there was a problem with baby it’s cold outside Trumpers would be lining up to burn those records. Just like trump defended white supreacist and now you guys are stuck defending a convicted murder and nazi.
Why do you think you know more than the jury? Getting a conviction on premeditated murder isn’t easy.
The prosecution OBVIOUSLY made their case.
That right there is what defending him looks like. If you don’t think he was intending to kill people when he drove his car into that crowd you are delusion.
It is no different than if he opened fire on that crowd.
A nazi drove his car into a crowd of people he didn’t like on purpose. Just condemn it and more on. Stop making excuses and trying to put his crime in a lesser category.
Nobody was hitting his car when he came flying down that road into the crowd. After he started plowing through people some of the antifa thugs were clubbing his car.
He may not have come down from Ohio with the intent of killing anyone, but once he accelerated his car into the crowd he had definitely formed an intent to harm people.
I don't know why - like Trans - this has to do with "Trump" in your mind. Apparently everything in the news does.
And the more I read of the court's decision and the arguments, I'm inclined to agree.
But I need to HEAR it first. No matter how heinous the crime, a man deserves his day in court.
With any luck, he'll get the death penalty the second time around.
You were reflexively defending him for No logical reason, just like Trumpers do. It’s been fun watching the SOMD brain trust defend this guy and a bunch of other white supreacist because trump sided with them. For ####s sake, this guy is a self admitted nazi and now convicted murderer.One - you're confusing blind support of Trump with Obama supporters.
Most of us are keenly aware of his foibles.
But you're doing what you do when you don't have an argument - it has no more to do
with Trump than any other topic on this forum. It only has to do with Trump because
the voices in your head are telling you it is. It just isn't.
I don't. For like the fourth time, I am puzzled by a first degree conviction.
Since you think like a leftist, you see that as being against it.
Indeed. And I've done more research on the trial this morning, which is tough since most news sources
say pretty much the same damned thing ad infinitum. Besides defeating the credibility of the self-defense
argument, they were able to show that months ago, he'd posted a picture of someone mowing people down
with a car and sending people airborne. So they were able to establish premeditation, even if his precise
victim wasn't known.
And this is why the left doesn't believe in due process. I want to hear his argument. I want to hear it all.
You've condemned him the moment you heard about it. YOUR response is the typical one.
And you are doing PRECISELY what you're accusing others of - you heard the story, made your conclusion
and condemned him before he had his day in court. Why bother to have a trial at all if his guilt is known beforehand?
You know, I'm always amazed by historical events like the Boston Massacre. I'm sure you know the events as
all kids growing up did. British soldiers opened fire on American civilians, killing Crispus Attucks, an African American
often described as the first casualty of the Revolution. LESS known is they were tried, and six of the soldiers were
acquitted - by none other than John Adams. He showed that those men - despite being the hated British soldiers -
were in fact defending themselves. The remaining two were convicted of manslaughter, but had their sentences
reduced, because the jury was convinced they were threatened. This is why we have courts in the first place.
I've sat on juries. I've seen people whom I believed guilty at first convince me otherwise - I've helped decide in
cases where "guilt" wasn't so easy.
I don't know why - like Trans - this has to do with "Trump" in your mind. Apparently everything in the news does.
And the more I read of the court's decision and the arguments, I'm inclined to agree.
But I need to HEAR it first. No matter how heinous the crime, a man deserves his day in court.
I did hear that they smashed his car BEFORE he accelerated the first time. I can't find testimony
corroborating that - only the defense's statement. This was a violent, mentally disturbed kid who
admired Hitler and abused even his own paraplegic mother (not surprisingly, like many mass murderers
this past half-century - he grew up without a father, who died before he was born).
I'm still kind of amazed anyone is taking a side - we have Antifa on one side, and Nazis on the other.
Frankly, for most of us, it's like watching Iran fight Iraq. Just break out the popcorn.
Wouldn't that be something if you can rape and kill a toddler in Virginia and only get a few years in jail, yet this guy gets the death penalty?
Regardless, Fields is a nut and good riddance to him. Seattle and Portland, OR should take a page from this book when deciding what to do about AntiFa taking over their streets and attacking their citizens.
I'm pretty sure what folks object to is the double standard, not this Fields person being punished for his deeds.
Seattle and Portland, OR should take a page from this book when deciding what to do about AntiFa taking over their streets and attacking their citizens. .
For ####s sake, this guy is a self admitted nazi and now convicted murderer.
It’s funny how you are now spinning this into ‘I just needed more information.’
Regardless, Fields is a nut and good riddance to him. Seattle and Portland, OR should take a page from this book when deciding what to do about AntiFa taking over their streets and attacking their citizens.
I'm pretty sure what folks object to is the double standard, not this Fields person being punished for his deeds.
He killed someone. If an antifa thug kills someone, he should get the chair as well.