I believe you may have taken what I said in the wrong manner; What I was getting at was - given that the discussion was being conducted by a gay/lesbian rights supporter, I believe, when that question was offered up
to him. You might have thought he would taken the "flavor", or slant of the interviewer into consideration. Then, he might have paused, and answered the question with an idea as to why it was asked and how best to answer it.
In other words, realise how the question was being framed, who asked it , and how best to give a clear response.
I'm not sure he exercised his best judgement on that scale. JMHO