bcp
In My Opinion
whats retarded is people defending the rights of the retards to get behind the wheel drunk.Wow. That is pretty retarded.
That is all.
whats retarded is people defending the rights of the retards to get behind the wheel drunk.Wow. That is pretty retarded.
That is all.
I think that bars should be sued when it can be proven that the last drinking stop for somebody before an accident was their bar.
whats retarded is people defending the rights of the retards to get behind the wheel drunk.
whats retarded is people defending the rights of the retards to get behind the wheel drunk.
I
Perhaps they were at fault, but they were somebody's loved ones and I'd prefer to give the deceased a little respect and the benefit of the doubt until I hear otherwise.
But I was butting in my two cents on the completely unrelated tangent this tread has diverged into.![]()
![]()
I love these threads. Poor people aren't even gone 24 hours and already they're labeled stupid drunks.
Perhaps they were at fault, but they were somebody's loved ones and I'd prefer to give the deceased a little respect and the benefit of the doubt until I hear otherwise.
I came home with a Tiki Bar stamp my hand and I wasn't drunk or impaired.
Unpossible, they must of implemented that 2 drink limit and tiki breathalyzer already.
Unpossible, they must of implemented that 2 drink limit and tiki breathalyzer already.
Unpossible? What is that?
And no, it is not impossible. Many people go to the Tiki Bar, have a few drinks..drink water etc. over several hours and are just fine. If I know I'm driving, I am responsible.
It is internet lingo all the kool kids use, you must be too ........ nevermind.
And your sarcasm detector needs calabrating.
![]()
I'm old..but you're catching up.![]()
Personally Im getting tired of hearing about the loss of life due to accidents caused by drunk driving.
I think that bars should be sued when it can be proven that the last drinking stop for somebody before an accident was their bar. I dont think the drunk should be allowed to sue, but I do think that anyone involved innocently should be allowed to take legal action against the bar.
Basically when the bartender continues to serve drinks to an already drunk individual, they are saying that they value the dollar more than the life that is going to be lost when the idiot drives and kills someone.
A two drink limit, or a breath test before serving each drink would not be a bad idea either.
before you all get pissed at the thought of bars being regulated more to stop people from getting tore up and driving, just think about how you will feel when you get that call some night from the state police informing you that your spouse and children were involved in an accident with a drunk and were killed.
Some drunk takes out my family and Im just ignorant and unstable enough to return the favor for him/her.
I have heard that, but didn't know how true it was because I would think the establishment could be sued it proven they were at fault. I'm not sure if suing a bartender/bar solves the problem because if a person choses to get drunk they did that to themselves. However, I have been in clubs where you see people who are drunk, but a bartender will continue to serve them, which makes no sense especially when they know the person is drunk.
I love these threads. Poor people aren't even gone 24 hours and already they're labeled stupid drunks.
Perhaps they were at fault, but they were somebody's loved ones and I'd prefer to give the deceased a little respect and the benefit of the doubt until I hear otherwise.
I came home with a Tiki Bar stamp my hand and I wasn't drunk or impaired.
I love these threads. Poor people aren't even gone 24 hours and already they're labeled stupid drunks.
Perhaps they were at fault, but they were somebody's loved ones and I'd prefer to give the deceased a little respect and the benefit of the doubt until I hear otherwise.
I came home with a Tiki Bar stamp my hand and I wasn't drunk or impaired.