Police Officers Acquitted

AndyMarquisLIVE

New Member
The reason is ...

Come on, Andy. You are the one who said they should have fired warning shots. Why?

Since you don't know the answer, I'll spell it out for you:

You only shoot when deadly force is justified. If you don't think deadly force is justified, you do not shoot. If you do think deadly force is justified, you shoot for center of mass. Why waste time firing a warning shot and letting the bad guy get a shot off at you?

Next, what should he have fired the warning shot at? One of the surrounding buildings where he could hit an innocent? Up in the air where it could come down on an innocent? At the pavement where the ricochet could hit an innocent or one of the other officers?

Tell me, Andy. You said they should have fired a warning shot. Please explain.
... to let them know they are armed officers. :duh:

It's not at all possible that the victims were just scared these could be thugs chasing them around? :shrug:
 

theArtistFormerlyKnownAs

Well-Known Member
:yay:

You go, girl!
:rolleyes:

:lol: I looked over once and didn't even see anything spelled wrong :shrug:

That may be your spin but this is my understanding of what happened


Undercover detectives were inside the club, and plain-clothes officers were stationed outside.

"Witnesses said that about 4 a.m., closing time, as Bell and his friends left the club, an argument broke out. Believing that one of Bell's friends, Joseph Guzman, was going to get a gun from Bell's car, one of the undercover detectives followed the men and called for backup."

Mine was a MADE UP STORY OF HOW THE SITUATION COULD HAVE GONE.


Everyone get that now? Sorry I can't give testimony of what actually happened, I wasn't there. Would one of you like to step up and present your first hand account of the incident?
 

theArtistFormerlyKnownAs

Well-Known Member
... to let them know they are armed officers. :duh:

It's not at all possible that the victims were just scared these could be thugs chasing them around? :shrug:

No warning shots. MM is right, that is a stupid idea :lol:

I agree with the idea that the drunk people could have/probably thought that there were thugs chasing them :shrug: I'd pull a gun too if some lunatic was running after me and flashed a gun...Oh wait, the victims didn't have a gun to pull :rolleyes:
 

MMDad

Lem Putt
... to let them know they are armed officers. :duh:

It's not at all possible that the victims were just scared these could be thugs chasing them around? :shrug:

Try again.

A "warning shot" would just let them know somebody was firing shots. It doesn't identify the person as a cop.

The cop yelling "Stop! Police!" would probably be a more effective way to let them know, don't you think? They should have done that.... oh, that's right, they did!

Now, answer the rest of the question. Where should he have fired the "warning shot?" Who should he have endangered?
 

MMDad

Lem Putt
:lmao:

well, lets find out...



apparently I was thinking about the treatment you need whenever I posted that :yay:

Nice cover. Or maybe not. Why didn't you capitalize it if you were talking about the test? Why did you type it three times?

Come on now, Johnny. You called me stupid, so let's see if you are smart enough to admit you're wrong.
 

theArtistFormerlyKnownAs

Well-Known Member
Nice cover. Or maybe not. Why didn't you capitalize it if you were talking about the test? Why did you type it three times?

Come on now, Johnny. You called me stupid, so let's see if you are smart enough to admit you're wrong.

obviously I was wrong.

Do you need everything spelled out for you? :shortbus:

It was a JOKE because I realized the typo, but I didn't see it until you pointed it out.

You really need to lighten up :yay:
 

theArtistFormerlyKnownAs

Well-Known Member
As usual. You and Andy are good at that. Must have something to do with living in your mommy's basement.

I don't have a basement :shrug: (neither do my parents :razz: :lol:)


Yep, I live with my parents and am a whopping 19 years old...you got me good there :howdy:

So what is going to be your comeback whenever I am moved out later this year, hmm?

wait wait, let me say it...If I wanted come(sp)-back I'd get some off your lip :howdy:
 

AndyMarquisLIVE

New Member
Come on, Mr. "breaking news."

Answer the earlier questions. Who should he have shot with the "warning shot?"

How do four cops fire 50 rounds from "two or three clips?"
Again, here we go. Once we get scared, we must cling to our guns and shoot somebody.

They shouldn't have shot anybody since they were clearly NOT UNDER FIRE. :dork:

My understanding was that there were three cops, not four, and that they fired off 2 clips. Sorry if my memory is a little foggy from something that happened over a year ago. :duh:

I focus my memory on race events more than one random incident in NYC that doesn't affect me in the first place.

So, :biteme:
 

AndyMarquisLIVE

New Member
I don't have a basement :shrug: (neither do my parents :razz: :lol:)


Yep, I live with my parents and am a whopping 19 years old...you got me good there :howdy:

So what is going to be your comeback whenever I am moved out later this year, hmm?

wait wait, let me say it...If I wanted come(sp)-back I'd get some off your lip :howdy:
Don't you know. College students are supposed to be able to afford the $1200/month apartments in Waldorf since someone with a $77k/yr. job can.

Get with the program Johnny. :duh:
 

AndyMarquisLIVE

New Member
As usual. You and Andy are good at that. Must have something to do with living in your mommy's basement.
Last I checked, I was living upstairs for the $500/month rent I pay.

I could be wrong though, since you obviously know more about my parents' house than I do.

And, I WILL be moving out soon. Since it offends you that me and Johnny live at home, you'll be willing to lend us some spare change to afford an expensive azz apartment in Waldorf, right? :jet:
 

theArtistFormerlyKnownAs

Well-Known Member
Last I checked, I was living upstairs for the $500/month rent I pay.

I could be wrong though, since you obviously know more about my parents' house than I do.

And, I WILL be moving out soon. Since it offends you that me and Johnny live at home, you'll be willing to lend us some spare change to afford an expensive azz apartment in Waldorf, right? :jet:

I don't wanna live in Waldorf...I'd be spending half of my paycheck on gas to get to work :ohwell: :lol:
 

MMDad

Lem Putt
Again, here we go. Once we get scared, we must cling to our guns and shoot somebody.
You said they should fire warning shots. Did you not mean that?

They shouldn't have shot anybody since they were clearly NOT UNDER FIRE. :dork:

I see. Cops should not fire until they take a .44 magnum to the brain. Do you really think that a cop should die before returning fire? Tell me, how does a dead cop return fire?

My understanding was that there were three cops, not four, and that they fired off 2 clips. Sorry if my memory is a little foggy from something that happened over a year ago. :duh:
I see. Now you think that three cops fired 50 rounds from two "clips."

What do you think they did? Traded "clips" while firing?

By the way, you should be saying magazine. Using the word "clip" highlights your lack of knowledge.

How many rounds do you think a magazine holds?

I focus my memory on race events more than one random incident in NYC that doesn't affect me in the first place.
Why is a black cop shooting a black suspect a "race event?"

Why are you focusing on "race events" in New York, yet you blame every problem in Waldorf on black people living there?

:heh:
 
Top