It is interesting to see how "god's thinking" changed over time, which is unusual based on our normal interpretation of God.
For example:
Lev. 20:10 "`If a man commits adultery with another man's wife --with the wife of his neighbor --both the adulterer and the adulteress must be put to death.
And actually, the original punishment was more specifically stoning. Stoning is an obvious human tactic, God had other ways to destroy people when he wanted. But then again, who would be able to say that this person should be put to death?
And then In Chapter 8 of John in the new Testament we have the notorious "cast the first stone" dialog:
<DD>Jesus went unto the mount of Olives.
<DT>8:2 <DD>And early in the morning he came again into the temple, and all the people came unto him; and he sat down, and taught them.
<DT>8:3 <DD>And the scribes and Pharisees brought unto him a woman taken in adultery; and when they had set her in the midst,
<DT>8:4 <DD>They say unto him, Master, this woman was taken in adultery, in the very act.
<DT>8:5 <DD>Now Moses in the law commanded us, that such should be stoned: but what sayest thou?
<DT>8:6 <DD>This they said, tempting him, that they might have to accuse him. But Jesus stooped down, and with his finger wrote on the ground, as though he heard them not.
<DT>8:7 <DD>So when they continued asking him, he lifted up himself, and said unto them, He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her.
<DT>8:8 <DD>And again he stooped down, and wrote on the ground.
<DT>8:9 <DD>And they which heard it, being convicted by their own conscience, went out one by one, beginning at the eldest, even unto the last: and Jesus was left alone, and the woman standing in the midst.
<DT>8:10 <DD>When Jesus had lifted up himself, and saw none but the woman, he said unto her, Woman, where are those thine accusers? hath no man condemned thee?
<DT>8:11 <DD>She said, No man, Lord. And Jesus said unto her, Neither do I condemn thee: go, and sin no more.</DD>
: 
: 
