So are they just going to keep making up charges to file against Trump?

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
I wish the Dems were more candid about it, because they will first DENY it, then say it's not much, THEN say it doesn't affect the outcome of an election - EVER escalating an event they initially declare never happens.


If Republicans were coaching old folks in nursing homes, or picking up homeless and driving them to vote, they would screen bloody murder
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
Maybe then per Spoon, a benevolent monarchy is a better option.

Yeah about that ....

IMHO Monarchs do not STAY IN POWER without support of somebody else - Barons, Dukes, Counts ... the land owners -

you don't stay in power just because ; the court ' likes You .... Monarchs ' bought ' support giving lands and titles to other men, in trade for their support and taxes ...
 

herb749

Well-Known Member
If Republicans were coaching old folks in nursing homes, or picking up homeless and driving them to vote, they would screen bloody murder

Once they start doing what democrats are doing then democrats start passing laws to stop it.
 

Hijinx

Well-Known Member
I guess the problem is, there's this massive sentiment that voting should be continually made easier so as to not disenfranchise anyone.
Doing otherwise is always cast as a move toward racism.

To you and me, to even suggest that it's racist IS racist. It suggests - it outright DECLARES - that POCs need hand holding and coddling and assistance to exercise their most basic voting rights.


I don't know how to appeal to anyone, otherwise. Obviously the elderly in homes and the sick have a right to vote; it's not their fault they cannot drive or have easy access to transportation. I have family like that. But once that genie is let out of the bottle it opens the door for all sorts of voting mechanisms which are far less secure.

We already have a means of voting in person which has repeatedly proven to be insecure, because people have broken it and few have been caught. As more and more methods keep being added, I can't believe there exists ANYONE who has the balls to say it's 100% secure.
To you and me, to even suggest that it's racist IS racist. It suggests - it outright DECLARES - that POCs need hand holding and coddling and assistance to exercise their most basic voting rights.

Yes So?
 

Kyle

Beloved Misanthrope
PREMO Member
To you and me, to even suggest that it's racist IS racist. It suggests - it outright DECLARES - that POCs need hand holding and coddling and assistance to exercise their most basic voting rights.

Yes So?
They've been isolated in the Hood from things like checkboxes, touchscreens, levers, buttons and ball point pens.

Poor Dew-Wain.


 

StmarysCity79

Well-Known Member
Yeah, yeah. They get away with "coaching" RIGHT IN THE VOTING AREA, even though it is explicitly forbidden.

I don't know that anyone HONESTLY believes there's no cheating going on. I wish the Dems were more candid about it, because they will first DENY it, then say it's not much, THEN say it doesn't affect the outcome of an election - EVER escalating an event they initially declare never happens.

It is precisely the behavior you get from a compulsive liar, if you've ever interacted with one, although the more common response is complete total denial even if you have them on film, with the smoking gun above the dead body - with witnesses. I used to have a roommate who would deny he was smoking, even when we all saw him and could point to the still smoking butt on the ground where we saw him throw it.

I must admit though, I'm becoming increasingly concerned that this great nation may be under some form of total authoritarian rule before long. We have at least one party that believes the best thing for people is what they believe, even if the people do not choose it. We had a man lose an election because he was stupid enough to suggest that schools had more rights over children, than parents. This is evolving into party position, and the trans issue is making the case that doing other than what the state wants with your children - is ABUSE, and tantamount to losing parental rights.

You may find yourself living in a nation where the basic Communist premise - the state knows best - will be the law of the land.


All you have to do is prove what you are saying instead of just repeating lies over and over
 

Toxick

Splat
No amount of enlightenment could help you at this point.


Translation: I don't know jack-crap either, but I'm hoping that my arrogant and sanctimonious tone makes everyone think I do. And if you call me out on it, you're a racist, sexist, homophobic troglodyte.


You want so desperately to believe you haven't been supporting politicaly and financially a criminal for all these years.

...Said the desert to the golf-bunker.
 
This is such an obvious attempt to tie him up and keep him off the campaign trail and away from the debates I'm surprised we haven't risen up and put all their heads on a pike.

I don't really understand how the disgusting scumbag Democrats can get away with this.
"...how the scumbag Democrats can get away with this. " Tell me, how many Democrats gave testimony to the various Grand Juries? Do you really think all of those charges are made up? Just to keep him from campaigning? Really?
 

PrchJrkr

Long Haired Country Boy
Ad Free Experience
Patron
"...how the scumbag Democrats can get away with this. " Tell me, how many Democrats gave testimony to the various Grand Juries? Do you really think all of those charges are made up? Just to keep him from campaigning? Really?
Can you not see the trees for the forest? #ignore
 

WingsOfGold

Well-Known Member
All you have to do is prove what you are saying instead of just repeating lies over and over
Tubby are you Rachael Madcows carpet mate?
1692676640606.jpeg
 

SamSpade

Well-Known Member
PREMO Member
"...how the scumbag Democrats can get away with this. " Tell me, how many Democrats gave testimony to the various Grand Juries? Do you really think all of those charges are made up? Just to keep him from campaigning? Really?
Yes, but with a proviso - I think most of them are groundless. I've seen it done, and it has happened to ME. I've been in court and most of charges were outright dismissed by the judge, because they were crap. I've seen it with my own eyes - they come up with a buttload of charges, hoping ONE will stick.

And yes, it is to eff Trump up. IF, for whatever reason, he decides not to pursue the nomination, this will all stop. His opponents have said as much - "we can't let him back into the White House". Well good on ya, then - beat him in the election.

I don't think I've seen this big an effort to pile on ANY citizen of the United States - perhaps in history.
 
Nobody has answered the question, what Democrats have testified against Trump? Aren't the witnesses all Republicans? Did they leave the cult and turned? I mean, really. At some point you have to look at the facts. Read the indictments. Come back to reality.
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
Nobody has answered the question, what Democrats have testified against Trump? Aren't the witnesses all Republicans? Did they leave the cult and turned? I mean, really. At some point you have to look at the facts. Read the indictments. Come back to reality.

:howdy:

StMary's / Sapidus / Blue Cubed / StJohns

is this your latest old MPD
 

Ken King

A little rusty but not crusty
PREMO Member
Nobody has answered the question, what Democrats have testified against Trump? Aren't the witnesses all Republicans? Did they leave the cult and turned? I mean, really. At some point you have to look at the facts. Read the indictments. Come back to reality.
Alvin Bragg, Jack Smith, Fani Willis. They are testifying their beliefs to the Grand Jury to obtain indictments. As there has been no trial, yet, these indictments are not evidence of guilt.
 
Top