It's called Progressivism/socialism/marxism/leftism.... i.e. Democrats.
St. Louis couple draws firearms on protesters outside their home
- Thread starter GURPS
- Start date
It's called Progressivism/socialism/marxism/leftism.... i.e. Democrats.
PsyOps
Pixelated
Fascism
Soro Funded Progressive DA Morality Policing [from a far left perspective]
Communists / Marxist - Authoritarian Totalitarian Gov Types ..... I would not call them Democrats
PsyOps
Pixelated
I heard that on WMAL this morning. How does a private citizen fund a government entity?
Bribe.
The DA is an Elected Position
PsyOps
Pixelated
Yes. But DA's office and operations are funded by their local/state government (taxes). There is no outside funding required. Was this Soros thing some sort of bribe?
Hijinx
Well-Known Member
Any large funding of a Democrat campaign is a bribe. Now the little guys who donate don't expect much in return, but when a multi-Billionaire Nazi like Soros donates he expects a lot==and he gets it.
You know when he donates to Democrat Attorney generals in States all over the country, that something is up.
Ordinary people without a criminal or Nazi agenda just don't do that.
Grumpy
Well-Known Member
Breaking — Missouri Attorney General dismisses all charges against gun-toting McCloskeys…
Just hit the wires in the past 10 minutes… Missouri AG dropping charges against St. Louis couple who defended their home with guns ST. LOUIS, MO – Kim Gardner, Cir…
www.citizenfreepress.com
Louise
Well-Known Member
And, this is where we are today...
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/mc...g-couple-republican-national-convention-trump
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/mc...g-couple-republican-national-convention-trump
Nine BLM Protesters In St. Louis McCloskey Case Cited For Trespassing
Fox News reports nine of the roughly 300 BLM activists who were captured on video protesting on a St. Louis couple’s property have been cited for trespassing. One of them tweeted her bemusement at being held accountable.
[poster gets wrecked in her twitter feed]
Ashe should look up Missouri’s castle law. It’s broad for property owners who feel threatened by anyone who is not legally on their property. None of the 300 or so protesters had the right to be on the McCloskeys’ property that day. They didn’t have the right to break the security gate leading into the neighborhood.
People do have the right, enshrined in the Second Amendment, to own firearms, and Missouri’s law recognizes the natural right of self-defense.
Fox News reports nine of the roughly 300 BLM activists who were captured on video protesting on a St. Louis couple’s property have been cited for trespassing. One of them tweeted her bemusement at being held accountable.
[poster gets wrecked in her twitter feed]
Ashe should look up Missouri’s castle law. It’s broad for property owners who feel threatened by anyone who is not legally on their property. None of the 300 or so protesters had the right to be on the McCloskeys’ property that day. They didn’t have the right to break the security gate leading into the neighborhood.
People do have the right, enshrined in the Second Amendment, to own firearms, and Missouri’s law recognizes the natural right of self-defense.
‘ABOLISH THE SUBURBS!’: Fringe Activist Screams At McCloskeys After They Made Cards Of Confrontation
“Abolish the suburbs!” the woman screamed at the couple. “You are terrorists! No mask! You think pointing guns at protesters is nice? It’s fun? You think you’re cool? Abolish the suburbs!”
“Abolish the suburbs!” the woman continued to scream. “Abolish the suburbs! F* you, and your guns! F* the [inaudible]! F* you! F* you!”
Mark McCloskey then got out of the Cadillac Escalade that he was driving and calmly approached the woman, who screamed at them, “Don’t come near me! Don’t come near me!”
“Abolish the suburbs!” the woman screamed at the couple. “You are terrorists! No mask! You think pointing guns at protesters is nice? It’s fun? You think you’re cool? Abolish the suburbs!”
“Abolish the suburbs!” the woman continued to scream. “Abolish the suburbs! F* you, and your guns! F* the [inaudible]! F* you! F* you!”
Mark McCloskey then got out of the Cadillac Escalade that he was driving and calmly approached the woman, who screamed at them, “Don’t come near me! Don’t come near me!”
Judge Disqualifies Attorney Prosecuting McCloskey: Has ‘Appearance’ It Was Done For Political Reasons
Circuit Judge Thomas Clark II’s order against Circuit Attorney Kimberly M. Gardner and her office cited “two fundraising emails that Gardner’s reelection campaign sent in response to political attacks before and after she charged Mark and Patricia McCloskey with felony gun crimes in July,” the St. Louis Post-Dispatch reported. “The judge’s order deals a political blow to Gardner, whose office has waged numerous legal challenges to defend her practices and reform-minded agenda during her first term.”
The Post-Dispatch noted that Clark’s order only applied to Mark McCloskey and bars her office from prosecuting the case. The order does not apply to Patricia McCloskey, whose case is assigned to Circuit Judge Michael Stelzer. The order states that the a new prosecutor has to be appointed to the case.
“This court does not seek to ‘interfere with the democratic process’ but strongly believes the present ‘circumstances’ justify disqualification,” Clark wrote. “Deference to precedent, acknowledging the will of the voters, and respecting separation of powers are all vital to a representative government, an equitable criminal justice system and the rule of law. Likewise, campaigning without tainting the right to a fair trial is equally compelling and constitutionally sacred.”
Circuit Judge Thomas Clark II’s order against Circuit Attorney Kimberly M. Gardner and her office cited “two fundraising emails that Gardner’s reelection campaign sent in response to political attacks before and after she charged Mark and Patricia McCloskey with felony gun crimes in July,” the St. Louis Post-Dispatch reported. “The judge’s order deals a political blow to Gardner, whose office has waged numerous legal challenges to defend her practices and reform-minded agenda during her first term.”
The Post-Dispatch noted that Clark’s order only applied to Mark McCloskey and bars her office from prosecuting the case. The order does not apply to Patricia McCloskey, whose case is assigned to Circuit Judge Michael Stelzer. The order states that the a new prosecutor has to be appointed to the case.
“This court does not seek to ‘interfere with the democratic process’ but strongly believes the present ‘circumstances’ justify disqualification,” Clark wrote. “Deference to precedent, acknowledging the will of the voters, and respecting separation of powers are all vital to a representative government, an equitable criminal justice system and the rule of law. Likewise, campaigning without tainting the right to a fair trial is equally compelling and constitutionally sacred.”
We can say with a reasonable degree of certainty that Ms. Gardner is not the brightest bulb in the room. Gardner sent out two fundraising emails mentioning the criticisms of her office made by President Donald Trump and Governor Mike Parson, saying they were “fighting for the two who pointed guns at citizens during the Black Lives Matter protests.”
How dumb was that? Circuit Judge Thomas Clark II said she “raised the appearance” that she “initiated a criminal prosecution for political purposes” and promptly disqualified her.
St. Louis Post Dispatch:
How dumb was that? Circuit Judge Thomas Clark II said she “raised the appearance” that she “initiated a criminal prosecution for political purposes” and promptly disqualified her.
St. Louis Post Dispatch:
The McCloskeys’ lawyers had filed a motion earlier to have Gardner disqualified because it was painfully obvious she was using the incident to bolster her credentials as a liberal crusader. It should also be noted that nine protesters were charged with trespassing as a result of the incident. The charges were later dropped by Gardner.
St. Louis Prosecutor Fighting To Stay On McCloskey Case After Judge Booted Her For Appearing ‘Political’
St. Louis Circuit Attorney Kimberly Gardner has appealed a judge’s decision to dismiss her and her office from prosecuting the case of Mark and Patricia McCloskey, who were charged with gun crimes after threatening Black Lives Matter activists who broke into the couple’s gated community in June.
Last week, Gardner appealed the decision of Circuit Judge Thomas Clark II to remove her from the case over the “appearance of impropriety” raised after Gardner sent out fundraising emails that mentioned the McCloskey case, according to 5 On Your Side. Gardner argued that the judge’s ruling set “an extremely low standard” by which prosecutors could be removed from cases.
St. Louis Circuit Attorney Kimberly Gardner has appealed a judge’s decision to dismiss her and her office from prosecuting the case of Mark and Patricia McCloskey, who were charged with gun crimes after threatening Black Lives Matter activists who broke into the couple’s gated community in June.
Last week, Gardner appealed the decision of Circuit Judge Thomas Clark II to remove her from the case over the “appearance of impropriety” raised after Gardner sent out fundraising emails that mentioned the McCloskey case, according to 5 On Your Side. Gardner argued that the judge’s ruling set “an extremely low standard” by which prosecutors could be removed from cases.
Hijinx
Well-Known Member
It would seem that this "ladies" insistence on being allowed to "persecute" (Yes persecute is the right word Prosecute sounds somewhat like it and has some relation to it, but indeed prosecute is not he proper term here ). is evidence of her racist and flagrant attempt to convict white people who were only trying to protect their lives and their property. A right any person in this country should have. She should be asking where were the police who have the real job of doing what these people had to do for themselves.