tlatchaw said:You know, in the long run this may work out well for old NO. This is a perfect opportunity to rebuild the entire city infrastructure so that it drains better, is healthier, smells better (because no stagnant water in the pumping system) and has modern homes and workplaces. Sorry if this sounds callous to a beautiful and historic old city, but heck it's destroyed anyway, we may just as well make it the best possible when we fund the rebuilding (and you know we will).
In theory I agree, but my heart breaks for all that was lost and will never be the same. For me and I imagine thousands if not millions of other tourists, the attraction WAS its age and quaintness. There was nothing like wandering around the French Quarter looking at beautiful old buildings built in the 1700's. Strolling the cobblestone streets and listening to the clip-clop from the horse's hooves as carriages went slowly by. Taking the trolley to the Garden District, with its grand dames of architecture along streets lined with Live Oaks dripping with Spanish Moss. Dining al fresco at a restaurant on a wrought-iron balcony overlooking the cobblestone streets. Listening to great jazz on a hard bench at the un-airconditioned and unpretentious Preservation Hall and loving every second. It was like traveling back in time.
I enjoyed visiting the modern parts of the city. I went to The Top of the Mark with its rotating restaurant and spectacular vistas of the city. But chrome and steel don't do it for me. They have no soul. My time staying in the French Quarter is what I remember best, warts and all. I miss it already.