The Child Support Solution.

Midnightrider

Well-Known Member
JPC said:
:coffee: The child support is only extra money because all the children already have all their needs filled. The child support is overflow.

:wench: ------------------------------- :bigwhoop:
Ok, i'll go slow this time


How.....are.... the...childrens'....needs.....being....met?
With what funds?
 

Pete

Repete
JPC said:
:popcorn: There is a big difference because it is equating the government as a "big daddy" and that is a system that must be stopped.

:wench: ---------------------------- :buttkick:
Yet you would eliminate child support under $500 and let "Big Daddy" pick up the tab.


"Big Daddy" is also going to cut you a disability check every month too.

Mr. Hypocrit, when is it that you exactly hate "Big daddy" and when is it you love "Big Daddy"?
 

Pete

Repete
JPC said:
:popcorn: I do not lie. Right here is the link that gives them the power to take (steal) 65 percent of the parents money and leave the parent pillaged and impoverished. About half way down the page here,

Federal Consumer Credit Protection Act for Child Support Garnishment.

Even if most people do not know about the amounts and the abuses, the law and the Courts and the enforcement knows about it, and so do I, 65 percent.
LIAR

Apples and Oranges. FCCA is a federal protection from creditors garnishing wages for DEBT.

BTW brainiac, what does "DISPOSABLE INCOME" mean? It is 65% of "disposable income" NOT total wages you dunderheaded goober. :killingme

Child support IS NOT DEBT, it is an OBLIGATION.

Nevertheless LIAR

If you sire 7 kids and make $40,000 and you are the sole provider, your spouse makes 0 and she has custody, the support award is $1282 a month out of $3333 monthly income. Which is 38.4% of your income.

In other words NO MATTER HOW MANY KIDS YOU HAVE the MAX support award expressed as a percentage is less than 40%.

FCCA does NOT award support levels, it just says that if a court, any court orders a garnishment for child support it can go up to 65% but that point is moot because 40% is as high as it goes.

What this does not cover is if you are a deadbeat and the court orders you to pay your current support PLUS extra to apply to the arrears, THEN it could reach 65%.
 
Last edited:

mv_princess

mv = margaritaville
You know I was kind of glad when NMCI cut SOMD off, just so I couldn't read what JPC posted.

Kind of sad that I read this............JPC......You have no idea what your talking about, although I am impressed you can get up in the morning look at yourself in the mirror, not feel grief that you DIDN'T take care of your own child.


You sad sad little man
 

Pete

Repete
Toxick said:
Two things.

1) You do lie. Like a rug. Like a beat-up old dilapidated deadbeat rug.

2) This only applies to deadbeads for whom, if they had been paying their child support in the first place, no garnishment will take place at all. It's kind of like getting mad at the Electric Company for shutting you off when you owe them $600 - although if you had paid your $100 a month, there would be no problem. Quit trying to pretend like they'd actually make you pay 65% of your income... the page you cited and the garnishments listed are for arrears.
It is "65% of disposable income" anyway.
 

Ponytail

New Member
JPC said:
...all the children already have all their needs filled.


What website did you get THIS info from? Have you not heard of Welfare and do you not know how many single parent families (meaning one parent and children) are registered in this area for Welfare or how many qualify and use food stamps?

I ask, because you, being a political figure wanting to fight the laws that in part support the welfare system, should know these figures, correct? And I don't know. So, I ask you, how many single parent families in say, Lexington Park, are registered for Welfare benefits?

:popcorn:
 

Ken King

A little rusty but not crusty
PREMO Member
Pete said:
It is "65% of disposable income" anyway.
Come on Pete, we've been over this with the "poster" and the "poster" still has zero clue as to what any of the current laws mean, yet he will change them, you can take that to the bank. No matter how many times or different ones of us tell him so and point the law out to him and what it is saying. And it hasn't stopped this "poster" from believing that he is what district 29B needs as a delegate, he sees himself as the savior. Deaf, dumb, and blind - he's all three monkeys at once.
 
J

JPC, Sr.

Guest
The Truth Shall Set Us All Free.

Ken King said:
Come on Pete, we've been over this with the "poster" and the "poster" still has zero clue as to what any of the current laws mean, yet he will change them, you can take that to the bank. No matter how many times or different ones of us tell him so and point the law out to him and what it is saying. And it hasn't stopped this "poster" from believing that he is what district 29B needs as a delegate, he sees himself as the savior. Deaf, dumb, and blind - he's all three monkeys at once.
:coffee: I put a link with verifiable proof and these two tell me my info is wrong. Believe those two or believe the verifiable link.

Victory is coming to 29B......
 

Ken King

A little rusty but not crusty
PREMO Member
JPC said:
:coffee: I put a link with verifiable proof and these two tell me my info is wrong. Believe those two or believe the verifiable link.

Victory is coming to 29B......
But the problem is that, unlike you, they have read and understand what the rule is that you have decided to bring about.

Tell me what this law that you linked means to you? As I read it it is about the garnishment of wages used when people fail to voluntarily meet their legal obligations.
 
J

JPC, Sr.

Guest
The Truth Shall Set Us All Free.

Pete said:
It is "65% of disposable income" anyway.
:coffee: It is tricky wording but disposable income means 65 percent after taxes and FDIC. It is actually a mathimatical trick that I have calculated before.

Take 65 percent of the take home pay is the exact same amount as 65 percent of the gross pay minus the taxes and FDIC.

So disposable income means that taxes and social security must be garnished first and then 65 percent of whatever is left, thus disposable income.

The link still tells us 65% can be garnished for child support which means pillage and plunder and impoverish the paying parent. Inslave the separated parent. 65 percent is slavery thus the parent rebels.

:coffee: ----------------------------- :howdy:
 

Toxick

Splat
JPC said:
The link still tells us 65% can be garnished for child support which means pillage and plunder and impoverish the paying parent.


Here's my impression of JPC, Sr.
:lalala: :lalala: :lalala:



You are misrepresenting what is there at the page you provide.

You've become fixated on 65%, and it has seemingly driven all other thought and reason out of your head.


If you were simply opining that 65% is excessive, that would be one thing - however you are completely misunderstanding or misreading the page you cite, or you're being deliberately obtuse, and propagating a thinly veiled deception.
 

fttrsbeerwench

New Member
I'm so glad everyone else is as outraged by his garbage as I am..

JPC, how can you call yourself impoverished.. Youare a single man with no resposibilities but your own room and board.. You don't have custody of your child for a reason.. He was better of with his mother... If that were not the case he would be with a foster family since you are not a productive member of society. Since you can not hold a job.. SINCE YOU ARE A BUM!!!!

I will gladly organize a group to rally against your insane attempt at runnign for an elected office.. I would rather see just about anyone in that office but you...

IF ANYONE WANTS TO SET OUT AGAINST THIS MORON, PM ME....It's not a hard task to prove him an idiot... But I feel the need to prove a point..:war: It is now
imperitive(sic) that I meet this man face to face.

SINGLE PARENT FAMILIES AGAINST JPC!!!
 

gumby

I AM GUMBY DAMMIT
fttrsbeerwench said:
I'm so glad everyone else is as outraged by his garbage as I am..

JPC, how can you call yourself impoverished.. Youare a single man with no resposibilities but your own room and board.. You don't have custody of your child for a reason.. He was better of with his mother... If that were not the case he would be with a foster family since you are not a productive member of society. Since you can not hold a job.. SINCE YOU ARE A BUM!!!!

I will gladly organize a group to rally against your insane attempt at runnign for an elected office.. I would rather see just about anyone in that office but you...

IF ANYONE WANTS TO SET OUT AGAINST THIS MORON, PM ME....It's not a hard task to prove him an idiot... But I feel the need to prove a point..:war: It is now
imperitive(sic) that I meet this man face to face.

SINGLE PARENT FAMILIES AGAINST JPC!!!



Don't worry. he'll go away soon enough.
 

fttrsbeerwench

New Member
gumby said:
Don't worry. he'll go away soon enough.
Even if he bothers trying to post once the election is over.. I bet he won't be here long.. If he bothered to comment on another topic.. Someone, maybe, just maybe, find something to like about him....


I won't.
 

Pete

Repete
JPC said:
:coffee: It is tricky wording but disposable income means 65 percent after taxes and FDIC. It is actually a mathimatical trick that I have calculated before.

Take 65 percent of the take home pay is the exact same amount as 65 percent of the gross pay minus the taxes and FDIC.

So disposable income means that taxes and social security must be garnished first and then 65 percent of whatever is left, thus disposable income.

The link still tells us 65% can be garnished for child support which means pillage and plunder and impoverish the paying parent. Inslave the separated parent. 65 percent is slavery thus the parent rebels.

:coffee: ----------------------------- :howdy:
OK stool sample. I have explained this as clearly as possible. Follow along.

1. Your child support is calculated based upon what you earn. Regardless of what you make your support is less than 40% of your gross income.

2. You are OBLIGATED to financially support your kid. If you don't do it voluntarily our society has determined the law can force you in unpleasant ways.

3. If you don't make very much, you still have to pay but not very much. Your kid doesn't stop "needing" because you lose interest in paying.

4. If you lose your job or become disabled you can petition to modify your child support.

5. If you quit your job to dodge your child support they will not lower it.

6. If you do not pay you are in contempt of court.

7. If you are in contempt of court enough they will garnish your wages.

8. FCCA wage garnishment is NOT AGAINST the law. FCCA IS THE LAW.

9. If they garnish your wages they can take 50% of your disposable income. IF you are remarried or have another kid.

10. If you are single they can take 60%.

11. IF you are single AND more than 12 weeks behind in child support they can take 65%.

12. If you continue to dodge your support you go to jail in hopes that you are not so freaking dense you learn your lesson.

13. You are NOT a victim, you are a criminal.

14. You have no idea what the laws are.

15. You have a better chance of being elected dog catcher in Bum#### Egypt than you do of being elected delegate to the legislature.

16. All your problems could have been prevented IF you had paid as you were supposed to. You chose not to and despite your best efforts to cry victim you are not.

17. I have a mismatched sock drawer that is smarter than you are.
 

RoseRed

American Beauty
PREMO Member
Pete said:
OK stool sample. I have explained this as clearly as possible. Follow along...

I am SO lucky that my ex is more than happy to pay support for our daughter. He knows I cannot afford all the extras (dance classes, field trips, etc.) if I were all left up to me. He WANTS to help make sure that she gets the extras, in addition to food, a decent roof over her head and clothing.

Some people get it...
 

MMDad

Lem Putt
RoseRed said:
I am SO lucky that my ex is more than happy to pay support for our daughter. He knows I cannot afford all the extras (dance classes, field trips, etc.) if I were all left up to me. He WANTS to help make sure that she gets the extras, in addition to food, a decent roof over her head and clothing.

Some people get it...
I can't imagine not living with my kids, but it sounds like he has the next best deal. Your kid is so lucky. :love:
 

RoseRed

American Beauty
PREMO Member
MMDad said:
I can't imagine not living with my kids, but it sounds like he has the next best deal. Your kid is so lucky. :love:

Thank you and she is. Her dad is very involved in her life. He's even gonna man a cookie booth with her this weekend so she can reach her goal of selling 500 boxes! :lmao:
 
Top