Bustem' Down
Give Peas a Chance
I think the Corp was completely right in this decision. It maybe a "Christmas" program, but christians are not the only ones getting the gifts.
Evidently it is ok to make a Jesus doll, but don't even think of drawing a picture of Mohammed. I wonder if christians could be justified in burning down the offices of the distributor? I will guarantee that the Jesus doll is made in China also.Dondi said:I'm opposed to these Jesus dolls. I'm not bothered because of their religious nature or teaching intent, nor am I opposed for political or constitutional reasons.
I'm opposed because of the idea of a "Jesus" doll. While I'm all for giving Jesus the honor of celebrating His birthday and wishing everyone "Merry Christmas", I find it a bit appalling in reducing the Savior of the World, Creator of the Universe to a toy. What happen to little Johnny's Jesus doll in a couple of years when the head pops off and one of the arms is missing and is run over by the lawn mower? Or worse yet, some sadistic kid, like the brat in "Toy Story", decides to "crucify" his Jesus doll. Where's the respect in that?
MMDad said:Toys for Tots was right to reject this contribution. The dolls were not donated to make kids happy, they were donated to further the goals of the people who donated them.
Bustem' Down said:I think the Corp was completely right in this decision. It maybe a "Christmas" program, but christians are not the only ones getting the gifts.
MMDad said:I haven't read EVERY post here, so I apologize if this has already been said.
This wasn't a group of people who said "we have these extra toys, let's give them away!"
They said "Let's make a toy to convince people to beleive as we do. While we're at it, let's use the USMC to distribute these toys."
Toys for Tots was right to reject this contribution. The dolls were not donated to make kids happy, they were donated to further the goals of the people who donated them.
FromTexas said:Then why are the people getting the gifts celebrating Christmas?
Geek said:Easter is the most important holiday.
forever jewel said:
MMDad said:Toys for Tots was right to reject this contribution. The dolls were not donated to make kids happy, they were donated to further the goals of the people who donated them.
chernmax said:What goal is that, too spread a little Christianity during Christmas!!! So they reject the Jesus doll and accept the laser blasting, weapons carrying, bomb throwing terminator doll with the Kung-fu grip...
elaine said:Yep...and board games, baby dolls, roller skates, story books, art supplies, etc. None of the above items spreads any particular belief.
Toxick said:Religous issues aside: it's pretty effing ignorant and rude for a charity - one who's begs for crap every year - to throw voluntary donations back into the faces of donors.
elaine said:I guess you're right. They should have just accepted them and tossed them out.
Toxick said:Whatever.
If I'm on the street begging for food, and someone buys me a hotdog, I'm not going to smack it out of his hand because I want better food.
I'm sure they could have found children who would have appreciated the toy. It's not like Christians are that hard to come by.
elaine said:It's not a matter of better or worse, and I don't think they have time to ask all the parents "what would your child like for xmas", then rummage through all the gifts to find it.
Toxick said:It's a matter of a beggers becoming choosers.
I don't know about you, but I find that concept to be repugnant.
Geek said:Easter is the most important holiday.