Trump complained about wounded soldier performing in public

vraiblonde

Board Mommy
PREMO Member
Patron
See, if asking for better = asking for perfection, then we have to disagree. Asking Fetterman to not dress like a friken slob in the Seante isnt asking for perfection. What you seem to fail to understand is that to millions of people, when Trump does that stuff, its a Fetterman moment. I don't think being better than Fetterman is asking for perfection.

Fetterman has way worse traits than the way he dresses. In fact I'd say that's so far down the list as to be not worth mentioning.
 

SamSpade

Well-Known Member
PREMO Member
Fetterman has way worse traits than the way he dresses. In fact I'd say that's so far down the list as to be not worth mentioning.
Agreed. His clothing choices are a consequence of everything else. He's a seriously disturbed individual.

And it's beginning to spread through the Democratic Party like yeast - they promote, brag and celebrate having such human dreck representing them.

What is the problem with having the best and the brightest? Why should you ever have to continually make EXCUSES for people?
 

stgislander

Well-Known Member
PREMO Member
... they promote, brag and celebrate having such human dreck representing them.

What is the problem with having the best and the brightest? Why should you ever have to continually make EXCUSES for people?
I believe they think they are one and the same.
 

Kyle

Beloved Misanthrope
PREMO Member
Agreed. His clothing choices are a consequence of everything else. He's a seriously disturbed individual.

And it's beginning to spread through the Democratic Party like yeast - they promote, brag and celebrate having such human dreck representing them.

What is the problem with having the best and the brightest? Why should you ever have to continually make EXCUSES for people?
I always saw the Democratic Party as sub-human dreck.

They used the last 20 years to get better at it.

by 3032 The standard Democrat will be a cannibalistic, theiving, communist child molester.

oh wait… Does anyone know if Joe has consumed human flesh?
 

WingsOfGold

Well-Known Member
Tubby, you do realize The Atlantic is left of Mao why hasn't anyone else picked up on your bullshit? That being said thank you for your years of sacrifice in the military.
 

StmarysCity79

Well-Known Member
Que sera sera 🤷‍♀️

If voters decide that Joe Biden has been a terrific president and they're much better off with him than they were with Trump, oh well. You'll never get me to believe the 2020 election was on the up and up, but perhaps it *is* that Americans love crime and poverty and giving our tax money away to foreigners instead of helping our own. If Trump's bold language is such a deal breaker they'd rather have looting and lockdowns and schools turning their kids trans, that's just the way it is.


Why do you never respond when i ask you two show any proof that the election was "rigged"

Yet keep repeating the baseless lies over and over?
 

StmarysCity79

Well-Known Member
Yep, election had issues.

1. Fix those.
2. Get your own workaround the process like they did.
3. It ain't the "bold" stuff. Its the childish, vindictive, and petty stuff. Stupid pet names, that sort of thing. Americans on the whole prefer a leader who isn't reacting to others like they are in fifth grade. You can still call Shiff a liar. You can still call them corrupt. Straight bold true words.


Edit: Just to be clear. The thing that pisses me off most about the man is that with the single most important job in history of jobs wating to be done, he cannot exercise the self control needed to ace the freakin interview. I want him in there doing what he did before. Only more effectively. Not getting into twitter pissing matched with d list celebs. Buckle the eff down and stick to being the President.


Why cant you prove any of these so called issues?

And why do all experts, analysts and every other expert disagree with you?
 

StmarysCity79

Well-Known Member
Prove it didn't happen or STFU. And don't come back with, "Oh, because my cult leaders and propagandists say so." That's not proof.


I will allow the Trump campaign to do the honors

Trump's 2020 presidential campaign hired a research firm to probe the results for election fraud but found no evidence, with the findings kept away from the public​

The Berkeley Research Group was commissioned by the Trump campaign to analyze the voting data from six states to probe whether voter fraud or any irregularities had occurred during the 2020 election. Areas of focus for the probe were voter machine malfunctions, allegations that a mass of deceased individuals had voted in the election, and other evidence that could point to a Trump victory, per the report.

The Trump campaign envisioned using evidence from the report to bolster the then-president's claims in the public arena and in court.

But individuals with knowledge of the situation told The Post that the results didn't line up with what the Trump team had sought, and the research group's findings were subsequently not disclosed to the public.

 

StmarysCity79

Well-Known Member
A second firm hired by the Trump campaign to investigate fraud in the 2020 election said all of Trump’s fraud claims were false, the firm’s founder told The Washington Post

The Trump campaign hired Simpatico Software Systems and its founder, Ken Block, to investigate fraud claims all over the country after the 2020 election.

“No substantive voter fraud was uncovered in my investigations looking for it, nor was I able to confirm any of the outside claims of voter fraud that I was asked to look at,” he told the Post. “Every fraud claim I was asked to investigate was false.”


Block said he recently met with special counsel Jack Smith, the federal investigator into Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 election.

Campaign finance records show the campaign paid Block’s firm about $750,000, starting just days after the election.

A similar firm, Berkeley Research Group, was hired by the Trump campaign to investigate fraud claims. Like Simpatico, Berkeley did not find evidence of fraud or that the election was stolen.


 

WingsOfGold

Well-Known Member
Why cant you prove any of these so called issues?

And why do all experts, analysts and every other expert disagree with you?
1695831910562.jpeg
 

StmarysCity79

Well-Known Member


There are a certain numbers of independent journalists and observers allowed in each processing center and that varies by state.

What is this supposed to prove?

People still are looking in but allowing these people in would actually be more cause for concern as any of them could attempt to manipulate the ballots being counted or otherwise interfere.

Why are you so stupid that you believe this photo is somehow equal to two independent firms paid for by Trump both saying there was no fraud.


Because you have been lied to so much you will believe anything
 
Top