Trump News

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

Democrats Champ at the Bit for Trump Indictment, but DOJ Unlikely to Move Until After Midterms: Sources


As Bloomberg reported Wednesday, the unprecedented prospect of bringing charges against a former president is “creating intense scrutiny of the Justice Department” (angering Republicans already incensed by the DOJ and FBI’s persecution of Trump), following the raid on Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home.

In addition, a separate DOJ probe is focused on Trump’s alleged efforts to overturn the 2020 election.

Here’s more, via Bloomberg:

Under long-standing department policy, prosecutors are barred from taking investigative steps or filing charges for the purpose of affecting an election or helping a candidate or party, traditionally 60 days before an election. This year, that would be by Sept. 10, which makes it unlikely anything would be announced until after Nov. 8, said people who asked to remain anonymous speaking about potential Justice Department actions.
[…]
[T]he the impact of any criminal case against Trump would likely be significant. While he isn’t on the ballot in November, Trump has endorsed candidates who are, and he leads a fierce political movement. He recently demanded that he be reinstated as president or a new election held. Trump also might declare he’s running for president prior to November, which would make him the instant frontrunner for the Republican nomination.

To be objective — a concept foreign to many political pundits — Trump remains his own worst enemy.
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
Rant: Bill Barr. Barr made the Fox news rounds denouncing the judge's appointment of a special master, proclaiming Trump's guilt on classified records, and predicting an easy, quick reversal of the judge's order by the 11th Circuit. Many defended Barr during Trump's reign, and only a few of us whsipered doubts, privately and publicly. Why was I skeptical of Barr? History. Barr's father, the headmaster of an elite New York school, was the man who gave Jeffrey Epstein his first break, employing him over young girls and with access to the elite, despite Epstein's complete lack of credentials for the job. Barr's father went on to right novels featuring sexual abuse of underage girls. Barr, himself, got his government break working for Poppy Bush covering up CIA crimes during the 1970s, including destroying files and disappearing evidence, before Poppy Bush as President made him Attorney General for his heroic work covering up the Noreiga ties to the CIA and Bush in their criminal prosecution of him. Barr snookered Trump by writing editorials bashing Russiagate inquiries, and then leveraged that into assuring Trump's defeat in 2020, including the extradition of Assange, the cover-up of Biden family crimes, and ignoring evidence of election fraud. Guess what else he did? Think it a coincidence that Epstein died under Barr's watch? Like father, like son.


 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

Bill Barr’s Predecessor Calls Him ‘Institutionalist’ Who Should Know Better Than To Defend Mar-A-Lago Raid



Former Acting Attorney General Matt Whitaker told Just the News that Barr, who succeeded him in February, 2019, should know better than to cover for the DOJ, especially since he exposed so much of the department’s malfeasance in the Russia collusion hoax.

“Bill Barr continues for some reason to be an institutionalist when it comes to the Department of Justice, even though based on what he presided over, he should know better,” Whitaker told the site’s “Just the News, Not Noise” livestream show. “We have seen far too many examples as it relates to Donald Trump, and investigations into Donald Trump, that the Department of Justice just doesn’t seem to follow its own traditions, rules and ethical considerations.”
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

Dozens of Trump Allies Raided or Served Subpoenas by FBI



Bannon said there was so much going on about trying to bankrupt people or de-platform them, as well. “Screw them,” Bannon declared. “I spit in their eye.” This is all about intimidation, Bannon said, with financial terrorism and “lawfare.” But it’s unclear who the people he’s referencing here are because this has not had any real coverage. He also said that there was another grand jury coming together regarding Jan. 6. Bannon called the FBI Gestapo and said that this was intimidation because they knew that they were losing.

First Amendment attorney Harmeet Dhillon confirmed that she was aware of at least some of these cases.







Dhillon appeared with Tucker Carlson. She said that there had been a reporter reaching out asking if search warrants or subpoenas had been served on some 50 people. Dhillon confirmed to Tucker Carlson that search warrants or subpoenas had been served on three clients of hers — one of whom had their phone seized. The federal grand jury subpoenas were broad asking for any communications from October 2020, a month before the election to two months after the election. The subpoenas sought communications related to certification, fraud in the election, alternate electors, anything related to the rally before the Jan. 6 riot, and any communications related to the Save America PAC.
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

Department of Justice investigates Trump super PAC: report


The Department of Justice is investigating former President Donald Trump's Save America PAC as part of a grand jury inquiry into the former president's efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election.

Subpoenas issued this week to individuals associated with the leadership PAC seek to explore its formation, fundraising activities and the use of the money it raises, according to ABC News.

Save America was formed after the 2020 presidential election and has since raised millions on Trump's behalf. Following the FBI raid on Mar-a-Lago in August, Trump began fundraising off of the affair. The PAC reportedly raised over $1 million within two days of the raid, The Hill reported.

The PAC has reportedly brought in at least $135 million since it was created, per ABC, and had roughly $100 million in cash on hand at the end of July.
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

Judge Dismisses Trump Lawsuit Against Clinton as ‘Manifesto’


Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton, DNC, Campaign Rhetoric, Russia Collusion, 2016 Election, Russia, Courts, Bill Clinton, Justice, Lawsuits

AllSides Summary​

U.S. District Judge Donald Middlebrooks dismissed former President Donald Trump’s lawsuit against Hillary Clinton, the Democratic National Committee and several others on Friday, calling it a “political manifesto.”
Trump’s lawsuit alleged that Clinton and her allies “orchestrated a malicious conspiracy” to “weave a false narrative” of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.
In his decision, Middlebrooks — who was appointed by former President Bill Clinton — said Trump was “not attempting to seek redress for any legal harm,” but instead was “seeking to flaunt a two-hundred-page political manifesto outlining his grievances against those that have opposed him.” The judge appeared to sharply criticize Trump’s arguments, writing, “It is not simply that I find the Amended Complaint ‘inadequate in any respect’; it is inadequate in nearly every respect.” Not only had Trump’s lawsuit exceeded the statute of limitations, Middlebrooks wrote, the statements addressed by Trump’s complaint were “plainly protected by the First Amendment.” Newsweek (Center bias) noted that Middlebrooks appeared to threaten Trump’s lawyers with legal sanctions for potentially presenting a case without supporting evidence.
Coverage was widespread across the spectrum on Friday but was often drowned out by coverage of Queen Elizabeth's death. Some coverage across the spectrum used sensational words like “stomps,” “trashes,” and “scathing.”
 

Hijinx

Well-Known Member
It's certainly not surprising that a Clinton appointed judge would dismiss a suit against Hillary.
 

SamSpade

Well-Known Member
PREMO Member
It's certainly not surprising that a Clinton appointed judge would dismiss a suit against Hillary.
Interesting. You know if TRUMP appointed a judge, their decisions lack credibility.
If a Democrat appointed a judge, no one questions their decisions - at least, not the press and social media.
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

Biden’s DOJ Doesn’t Want To Disclose ‘Classified’ Mar-A-Lago Documents—Except Through Selective Leaks To Leftist Media



Biden Admin’s Request Proves Trump’s Point

Another significant point from last week’s filings comes from the government’s argument in its motion to stay. In arguing against Judge Cannon’s order that it not use the materials seized “for criminal investigative purposes pending resolution of the special master’s review process,” the Biden administration proves the need for a special master.

Throughout its motion, the government stresses the interconnectedness of the criminal and intelligence community’s work. The FBI uses the intelligence community’s classification review “to inform its ‘criminal investigation into the potential mishandling of . . . national defense information,’ as to which classification status is highly relevant,” the government highlights.

“The government must assess the likelihood that improperly stored classified information may have been accessed by others and compromised,” the DOJ continues, adding that “that inquiry is a core aspect of the FBI’s criminal investigation.” For these reasons, the DOJ argues it cannot separate the intelligence aspect of the investigation from the criminal investigation aspect.

In its motion to stay, the Biden administration further argues:

The integration of the FBI’s criminal investigative and national security-related missions would also make it exceedingly difficult to bifurcate the FBI personnel working on the criminal investigation from those working in conjunction with other departments or agencies in the [Intelligence Community.] Any FBI agent or analyst who investigated whether the classified records were improperly accessed, for instance, would by definition be gathering information highly relevant to—and thus in furtherance of—’criminal investigative purposes.’ And such bifurcation would make little sense even if it were feasible, given that the same senior DOJ and FBI officials are ultimately responsible for supervising the criminal investigation and for ensuring that DOJ and FBI are coordinating appropriately with the IC on its classification review and assessment.

These arguments seek to force the court into allowing its criminal investigation to continue prior to the special master’s review, by framing the court’s order as effectively halting intelligence agencies’ work protecting our national security interests. Beyond creating a false dilemma, the government’s argument proves precisely why a special master is needed to assess privilege: because the Biden administration’s review of the documents, including potentially privileged documents, concerns its criminal targeting of Trump.
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

Twitter 'whistleblower' handlers played key role in facilitating sham Trump impeachment







At the beginning of the hearing, it wasn’t clear what exactly the Zatko, who was fired by Twitter inc in January of this year, was trying to accomplish.

Then, he opined that the FTC and SEC did not have the necessary capacity to oversee Big Tech.

To your humble correspondent, this translates as a call to staff up Big Government regulatory bodies. That portion of the testimony, coupled with his team’s targeted leaks to the likes of CNN and The Washington Post, coupled with the strange reality of a “whistleblower” being celebrated by a bipartisan congress, is certainly a cause for suspicion.





Whistleblower Aid provided both counsel and media relations work to an anonymous intelligence community employee (who has been identified by Congress as Central Intelligence Agency official Eric Ciaramella), who alleged that President Trump pressured the Ukrainian government to accept a “quid pro quo” and launch an investigation of Joe and Hunter Biden.

If you’re a news junkie, surely you know the ins and outs of this story. But if you don’t, here’s a short summary:

Much of the alleged “quid pro quo” scandal was based on hearsay, sourced to a phone call between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodomyr Zelensky. No evidence surfaced of any monetary payment or governmental policy that supported the allegations. The transcript of the phone call between Trump and Zelensky was eventually released, and it did not show anything particularly scandalous or abnormal. Zero evidence ever emerged to back the claims sourced to Ciaramella, but despite these shortcomings, Congress found the votes to impeach Trump over the manufactured scandal.
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member










According to the Trump’s lawyer, Alina Habba, the lawsuit is “neither focused on the facts nor the law — rather, it is solely focused on advancing the Attorney General’s political agenda.”

“It is abundantly clear that the Attorney General’s Office has exceeded its statutory authority by prying into transactions where absolutely no wrongdoing has taken place,” she stated. “We are confident that our judicial system will not stand for this unchecked abuse of authority, and we look forward to defending our client against each and every one of the Attorney General’s meritless claims.”

James rejected a settlement offer from the Trump organization last month.

Trump reported to New York in August for a deposition, though he repeatedly invoked the Fifth Amendment during the interview. The attorney general’s investigation started in 2019 after former Trump lawyer Michael Cohen testified before Congress that financial statements from the Trump organization inflated the former president’s assets’ values in order to obtain more favorable loans.


 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

BARR LIED! FOIA Requests Reveal There Were No DOJ Investigations on Election Fraud After 2020 Election


Now there is proof that Bill Barr is and was lying.

On Thursday former Trump adviser Jeffrey Clark, the Director of Litigation at the Center for Renewing America, joined Steve Bannon on The War Room.

Jeffrey Clark told Steve the Center for Renewing America sent out FOIA requests to 12 US Attorney districts from the 2020 battleground states.

Bill Barr sent out a memo on November 9, 2020, saying there should be investigations of the elections.

Jeff Clark told Steve Bannon the FOIA requests have come back from every district but one with NO DOCUMENTS.

No investigations were done as a result of that memo. There is only one of the 12 districts that has not yet come in and that’s the eastern district of Pennsylvania.
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

Own goal: Biden's bid to discredit Trump with Mar-a-Lago raid has only made him more popular —I&I/TIPP poll

By Monica Showalter


If Joe Biden and his ruling Democrats had intended to discredit President Trump through their showy Mar-a-Lago raid, a new poll suggests they have failed miserably.

They've actually accomplished the opposite of what they set out to do.

According to the highly reputable and accurate I&I/TIPP, Trump has lost not a whit of popularity with Republican voters since the FBI raid.
In fact, he's actually gained.

What do the numbers say about Trump, who, between those two polls, endured the FBI’s raid, which has no precedent in U.S. history?
In August, 53% of Republicans said they would vote for Trump. In September, that number rose to 54%, a small gain. But Trump has a majority of his party, while Biden barely ekes out a third of the Democrats.
And, the important point, he lost nothing from the Mar-A-Lago raid. If anything, he gained support, while other potential challengers slipped.
Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, who received 17% in the August poll, dipped to 15% in September, while former Vice President Mike Pence dropped from 10% to 8%. No other GOP challenger received more than 2% in September.
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

Trump scores another win in Mar-a-Lago case



Former President Donald Trump on Thursday scored a major win in the ongoing court battle pertaining to the FBI's seizure of documents from his Mar-a-Lago estate in early August.

"There shall be no separate requirement on Plaintiff at this stage, prior to the review of any of the Seized Materials, to lodge ex ante final objections to the accuracy of Defendant's Inventory, its descriptions, or its contents," wrote U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon in the Thursday ruling.

Special Master Raymond Dearie, whom Cannon appointed to independently review the documents the bureau seized, had sought to require that Trump substantiate his claims that the FBI planted evidence during the raid. Trump repeatedly suggested such on social media posts but his lawyers stopped short of making the claims in formal court filings.
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

Trump slams ‘racist’ NY AG Letitia James for fraud lawsuit at Michigan rally



“They’re all attacking me including the racist AG, attorney general, in New York, whose state is falling apart from murders, rapes, robberies, drug deals and every other kind of form of record-breaking crime,” the 45th president said.

“The homeless are sadly but dangerously roaming all over the streets of New York City and the city is filthy as is this racist AG. She is just as bad as you’re going to get.”

Once again, Trump did not elaborate on his claim that James, who is black, was “racist.”

Trump then played a compilation of news anchors dismissing James’ lawsuit to boos from the audience.

The ex-president mocked James for her short-lived gubernatorial campaign last year. James would have faced Gov. Kathy Hochul, but instead backed out of that race and sought a second term as attorney general.

“You know what her campaign was? I didn’t know her, she didn’t know me — ‘I will get Donald Trump’,” he said.

“She’s terrible on crime — unless it’s Donald Trump we can get in some form. But then they sued me even though there’s no victim.”
 
Top