Ukraine / Russia - Actions and Reactions

GURPS

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

NSA Sullivan: Russia Could Use Chemical Weapons, Then ‘Pin The Blame’ On U.S. Or Ukraine​



“There are reports of white phosphorus being used in Ukraine, reports of chlorine gas,” Brennan said. “How imminent is a chemical weapons attack in Ukraine?”

Sullivan said that while he cannot make an exact prediction, the “escalating level of rhetoric” from Russia seeming to claim that the U.S. or Ukraine are poised to deploy chemical weapons is a sign that Russia “getting ready to do it and try and pin the blame elsewhere.”

He then reiterated what President Biden said on Friday, that if Russia uses chemical weapons, “they will pay a severe price.”

Brennan pressed Sullivan on if American military force might be used in the event of a chemical weapons attack, but Sullivan stated that he wouldn’t “go further than what President Biden said on Friday” regarding “severe” consequences for such a weapons attack.
 
PJay

PJay

Well-Known Member
️Crimea got its water back

For 8 years the Crimean population suffered from drought after Ukraine blocked the North Crimean Canal. It had covered 85% of the peninsula's water consumption. The consequences of the blockade for the environment and many livelihoods were fatal.

The reservoir near Simferopol is now 90% full again.

Video in link

gab.com

SSG_PAIN on Gab: '⚡️Crimea got its water back ⚡ For 8 years the Cr…'

SSG_PAIN on Gab: '⚡️Crimea got its water back ⚡ For 8 years the Crimean population suffered from drought after Ukraine blocked the North Crimean Canal. It had covered 85% of the peninsula's water consumption. The consequences of the blockade for the environment and many livelihoods were fatal...
gab.com gab.com
 
glhs837

glhs837

Power with Control
Hmm, but the Russians themselves say that Crimea was fine within a year or so. So did they suffer for eight years or only two? Note that links to sources are active in the quote below. Were the Russians lying then or are they lying now?

en.wikipedia.org

North Crimean Canal - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org

According to official Russian statistics, the Crimean agricultural industry fully overcame the consequences of blocking the North Crimean Canal and crop yields grew by a factor of 1.5 from 2013 by 2016.[6] The reported rapid growth in agricultural production in the Crimea is due to the fact that, with the help of subsidies of the order of 2–3 billion rubles a year from the budget of the Russian Federation, agricultural producers of Crimea were able to increase the fleet of agricultural machinery.[7][8][9]
 
Kinnakeet

Kinnakeet

Well-Known Member
DaSDGuy said:
Economics - excerpt follows
  • The EU-US trade and investment relationship remains strong despite the economic challenges related to the Covid-19 pandemic. In 2020, EU companies exported goods worth €353 billion, almost €2 billion more than in 2018. More than 164,000 EU companies export to the US, almost 93,000 of which are SMEs.
  • Total US investment in the EU is three times higher than in all of Asia.
  • EU investment in the US is around eight times the amount of EU investment in India and China together.
  • EU and US investments are the real driver of the transatlantic relationship, contributing to growth and jobs on both sides of the Atlantic. A third of this transatlantic trade comprises intra-company transfers.
  • The transatlantic relationship defines the shape of the overall global economy. For most countries, either the EU or the US is the largest trade and investment partner.
  • Together, the EU and the US economies account for about half of world GDP and for nearly a third of world trade flows.
Full article:

ec.europa.eu

EU trade relations with United States

Facts, figures and latest developments.
ec.europa.eu ec.europa.eu

Now, if your goal is the same as antifa and the democratic party, i.e., complete destruction of the US economy, then by all means leave the EU to survive on their own. Neville Chamberlain approves.
Click to expand...
I think if we make everything here in AMERICA we will be just fine might have to deal with other countries for some stuff that is not in AMERICA but we will be better off if we left everything and everyone else alone,If other countries need help then they will have to pay big time for our services
 
GURPS

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
The truth is the fact checkers lied, big time. The “science” didn’t “evolve.” It was a simple fact: whether there were, or were not, U.S.-supported biolabs researching weaponizable pathogens in the Ukraine that the Russians knew about. Our fact checkers assured us, promised, there was NO WAY. Then, just when the Russians started closing in on the labs, all of a sudden it’s like “well OF COURSE we’ve been helping research ANTHRAX in Ukraine because science. And safety!”

So, they want us to believe that the U.S. government is helping a non-ally bordering one of our major geo-political enemies tinker with weaponizable pathogens like anthrax in multiple secret facilities — to innocently advance medical science and help poor people? Please.

Think about it. We’ve been DELIBERATELY loading dangerous pathogens into advanced labs that could weaponize them into POLITICALLY UNSTABLE COUNTRIES like Ukraine? A country that JUST had a massive color revolution in 2014? How does that make sense? And somehow the Pentagon seems to know in real time whatever the Ukrainians are doing in those labs, like destroying the evidence, I mean the pathogens?




☕️ Coffee & Covid ☙ Monday, March 14, 2022 ☙ TRIGGERED 🦠

Republicans seek to expand jab injury compensation; Tom Brady unretires; biolabs in Ukraine; my proposal to stop the war; Harris triggers Russia; and more...
www.coffeeandcovid.com www.coffeeandcovid.com
 
PJay

PJay

Well-Known Member
53e9976e992e78ac.jpg


I hate our government.. they have lied about everything!

So many lives lost and suffering because of their lies!
 
GURPS

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

Deep State Veteran Victoria Nuland’s Answer On Alleged Bioweapon Labs In Ukraine Is Cause For Concern​


As Greenwald notes, this brief exchange raises a number of questions that our government needs to answer. Among them:

  1. The question Rubio posed was whether Ukraine had “chemical or biological weapons.” Nuland’s answer referred to “biological research facilities.” Was that an indication that Ukraine did have biological weaponry, or the capability to develop it? Was Nuland really answering “Yes” to Rubio’s question?
  2. Rubio seemed surprised by Nuland’s answer. But he is the ranking Republican on the Senate Intelligence Committee. If the US is in fact assisting a Ukrainian bioweapons program, was the Senate Intelligence Committee not told of that?
  3. Why did Rubio cut Nuland off rather than following up and take the colloquy in a different direction?
  4. Why is the US urgently “working with the Ukrainians on how they can prevent any of those research materials from falling into the hands of Russian forces”? Is it perhaps because the materials would provide evidence of US involvement in a Ukrainian bioweaponry program?
  5. If the labs are working on Russian bioweapons, as the Pentagon claims, why has it taken so long to remove these biomaterials and why is Nuland worried that Russian bioweapons would fall into the hands of old Russians (who certainly would already have these bioweapons)?
  6. Rubio sought Nulan’s assurance that if there were an incident involving bioweapons, only Russia would be to blame for it. By asking that, Rubio heightened the risk of a “false flag” episode in which the Ukrainians used bioweaponry (assuming that there are such materials in the “facilities”), secure in the knowledge that the US would denounce the Russians for using it. Rubio seemed to be trying to close off any suggestion that Ukraine – and the US, if it is partnering with Ukraine in bioweaponry research – should be held accountable for any incident. How can the Republican chair of the intelligence committee be this irresponsible?
As Greenwald emphasizes, these are only questions, not claims of fact. We simply do not know, for sure, what is going on in Ukraine’s “biological research facilities.” The Ukrainian research program may well be designed solely for innocent and valid purposes such as animal health (e.g., combating swine fever virus) as Robert Pope, the Director of the Defense Department’s Cooperative Threat Reduction Program, has contended.
 
PJay

PJay

Well-Known Member

Zelensky Thanks Zuckerberg For Helping Him Win The Propaganda War​



ZeroHedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero
www.zerohedge.com www.zerohedge.com
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top