Dear 2ndAmendment,
With regards to your claim that 'islam spread by the sword and imposed slavery', this is a argument is weak just like the rest of the ones you've been conjuring up today. The fact that you didn't even bother quoting a reputable historical source for a timeline that listed a bunch of dates doesn't mean anything. For example, the mere fact that Muslims conquered Jerusalem doesn't mean that it was done violently.
Here is the peace treaty between the Second Caliph Umar (may God elevate him) and the Jewish and Christian inhabitants of Jerusalem:
“This is the protection which the servant of God, Umar, the Ruler of the Believers, has granted to the people of Jerusalem. The protection is for their lives and properties, their churches and crosses, their sick and healthy and for all their coreligionists. Their churches shall not be used for habitation, nor shall they be demolished, nor shall any injury be done to them or to their compounds, or to their crosses, nor shall their properties be injured in any way. There shall be no compulsion for these people in the matter of religion, nor shall any of them suffer any injury on account of religion...
The French historian Michaud (1767-1839), who traveled in the Middle East and wrote a book on the Crusades called Bibliotheque des Croisades (Library of the Crusades), says on the conquest of Jerusalem by the Crusaders in 1099, “
The Muslims were massacred in the streets and in the houses. Some fled from death by precipitating themselves from the ramparts; others crowded for shelter into the palaces, the towers and above all, in the mosques where they could not conceal themselves from the Crusaders. The Crusaders, masters of the Mosque of Umar, where the Muslims defended themselves for sometime, renewed their deplorable scenes which disgraced the conquest of Titus. The infantry and the cavalry rushed pell-mell among the fugitives. Amid the most horrid tumult, nothing was heard but the groans and cries of death; the victors trod over heaps of corpses in pursuing those who vainly attempted to escape.”
When the Muslims re-conquered Jerusalem in 1187, they again showed extreme mercy and kindness. The ruler at the time, Sultan Salahuddin Ayyubi, gave free pardon to the Christians in the city. Only the soldiers were required to pay a very small fee. However, the Sultan himself paid the fee for about ten thousand people. His brother paid it for seven thousand people. Salahuddin also allocated one of the gates of the city for people who were too poor to pay anything to leave from there.
These historical facts completely refute your claim on this one particular instance. In fact, if necessary, an entire thread could be dedicated in refuting the absurd allegations raised in your hitherto uncited article.
However, instead of doing so, I will argue general principles that will refute your claims, one by one.
Firstly, Islam itself prohibits forced conversions.
The Qur'an itself says "There is no compulsion in religion." Contrary to the Pope's erroneous claim that this verse was an early verse, this verse was a later verse revealed during the Madinan period where the Prophet Mohammed (peace be upon him) had established a government. The verse was a prohibition on him and his followers to force people to convert.
Secondly, historians of notable repute agree that Islam spread peacefully, not by force.
"The question of why people convert to Islam has always generated intense feeling. Earlier generations of European scholars believed that conversions to Islam were made at the point of the sword, and that conquered peoples were given the choice of conversion or death. It is now apparent that conversion by force, while not unknown in Muslim countries, was, in fact, rare. Muslim conquerors ordinarily wished to dominate rather than convert, and most conversions to Islam were voluntary."
- p 198 of "A History of Islamic Societies" by Ira Lapidus -
Professor Thomas Arnold has dedicated an entire book on the topic of the peaceful spread of Islam entitled "The Spread of Islam in the World"
Thirdly, even today, Islam is spreading peacefully, all through out the world
In fact, over 60,000 people converted to Islam in Rwanda.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A53018-2002Sep22.html
Note how 4 clergyman from the Catholic church were charged with assisting genocide and face charges of war crimes.
Christians had actively participated in the a genocide that resulted in the death of 800,000 people. This isn't from a few centuries ago, this is within the past decade.
Lastly, Christianity has a history of forced conversions during the Crusades, Inquisition, and the entire history of colonization where Christopher Columbus forced thousands of Native Americans into slavery and Christianity. Lets not forget that the same thing happened to African Americans, of which 20% are estimated to have been Muslim who were forced into Christianity. Some as recent as 150 years ago.
With Peace,
Abdulhaqq