The one we're fighting right nowabdulhaqq said:Which wars have been caused by Muslims?
The one we're fighting right nowabdulhaqq said:Which wars have been caused by Muslims?
You are too hard headed and pompous to have a serious discussion with. As soon as you are faced with legitimate facts you post "The qu'ran condemns terrorism" and figure that is good enough. When it isn't you get indignant. You have NOT refuted every claim, you have gone to your vast bank of cut and paste rebukes to "non Muslims with valid points."abdulhaqq said:Dear Pete et al,
I'd be more than happy to stop this flame copy/paste war and continue a civilized a discussion.
Every claim you've made has been responded in full. E
With Peace,
Abdulhaqq
vraiblonde said:The one we're fighting right now
Wait a minute - I do not think of the 9-11 terrorists as "his people" and Abdul has nothing to apologize for, unless he masterminded the hijackings.Kain99 said:Wake Up! Apologize like ya mean it! Your people, attacked MY people! Act Like it, and STFU!
Then why are Muslims worldwide in such a tizzy over it? Shouldn't be any of their business, right?abdulhaqq said:I'm sorry, I don't see the connection between the war on iraq and 9/11?
Are you honestly trying to draw a parrallel between Christians and Nazi's?abdulhaqq said:Was Hitler Christian or Muslim?
Steigmann-Gall's achievement is to have fully explored the extensive records of the Nazi era in order to illustrate these often conflicting conceptions of Christianity and to assemble the evidence in a carefully weighed evaluation. In so doing, he almost makes a convincing case. But his final view that, in light of the post-1945 ideological imperatives, Nazism had to be depicted as an evil and unchristian empire seems overdrawn. Yet he is undeniably right to point out how much Nazism owed to German Christian, especially Protestant, concepts and how much support it gained from a majority of Christians in Germany. That is certainly a sobering lesson to be drawn from this interesting and well-reasoned account.
Richard Steigmann-Gall. The Holy Reich: Nazi Conceptions of Christianity, 1919-1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003. xvi + 294 pp.
Bibliography. $30, ISBN 0-521-82371-4; 00 (cloth), ISBN .
Reviewed by: John S. Conway , Department of History, University of British Columbia.
Published by: H-German (June, 2003)
http://www.h-net.msu.edu/reviews/showrev.cgi?path=55161057430311
Pete said:You are too hard headed and pompous to have a serious discussion with. As soon as you are faced with legitimate facts you post "The qu'ran condemns terrorism" and figure that is good enough. When it isn't you get indignant. You have NOT refuted every claim, you have gone to your vast bank of cut and paste rebukes to "non Muslims with valid points."
Pete: What about Hezbollah and Iran?
Abdulhaqq: Well...well...what about the crusades? :booboolip:
Pete: What do the crusades 900 years ago have to do with Hezbollah kidnapping and killing Israeli's with the support of Syria and Iran?
Abdulhaqq: You are ignorant, can't read, and naive.
vraiblonde said:Then why are Muslims worldwide in such a tizzy over it? Shouldn't be any of their business, right?
And we are, in fact, still fighting in Afghanistan, against Al Qaeda, who are.....Christian? Mmmm...no. Jewish? I don't think so...
It's right on the tip of my tongue....I'll think of it in a minute...
PS, in case you didn't realize, Saddam Hussein may not have had a direct hand in 9-11, but he indeed was funding the terrorists and allowing them to set up training camps in Iraq.
Pete said:Are you honestly trying to draw a parrallel between Christians and Nazi's?
You really need to go back to recruiting school
And next you are going to wonder out loud why people here are close minded towads Islam.
RoseRed said:Vrai? How did he find us?
Come on Vrai... I have been his biggest proponent, through this whole thing. Why waffle now? You have challenged him, at every turn.vraiblonde said:Wait a minute - I do not think of the 9-11 terrorists as "his people" and Abdul has nothing to apologize for, unless he masterminded the hijackings.
What he COULD do is stop making excuses and waffling in his condemnation: "Yeah, Muslims did *this* but look at what Christians have done! " It's not particularly endearing or inspirational.
vraiblonde said:Wait a minute - I do not think of the 9-11 terrorists as "his people" and Abdul has nothing to apologize for, unless he masterminded the hijackings.
What he COULD do is stop making excuses and waffling in his condemnation: "Yeah, Muslims did *this* but look at what Christians have done! " It's not particularly endearing or inspirational.
abdulhaqq said:Dear vraiblonde
I apologize. I think people have misinterpreted my comments regarding violent christians. I wasn't trying to say 'christians are violent'. I was merely trying to illustrate the flawed logic of associating an entire religion on the actions of the few. If we can judge all of Islam based on the actions of a few wicked Muslims, then we should be consistent in our reasoning and apply it to christianity when their are bad christians or hinduism when there are bad hindus. I condemn general and overly broad stereotypes. I was trying to get people to see how it felt if someone made broad stereotypes against their religion.
With Peace,
Abdulhaqq
Paleeeeeeezzze That may have been a Pakistani pilot trained by Americans, in an American helicopter, burning American fuel, firing an American missile, directed by an American AWACS, on a target illuminated by and American SOG team. Pakistan would not have done that 4 years ago, and probably wouldn't have today unless we gave them every incentive to do so.abdulhaqq said:Dear Pete,
Again, your reading comprehension has failed you again.
Firstly, I never denied the existence of Muslims who have chosen the path of terror. I have emphasized that our faith condemns their mistaken interpretation of our faith and Muslims are actively working accross the world to deal with this problem, including Hezbullah and Iran and many other terrorist organizations and countries. However, you would be blind to ignore the fact that today, as we speak, Pakistani military forces destroyed an Al Qaeda affiliated training camp Why are you so selective in citing current events? How are the actions of Muslim governments in Iraq and Pakistan and our many other allies where we have military bases and whose intelligence agencies are working with us in order to fight terrorism? There are over 1.4 billion Muslims. Do you know how many people are even in Hezbullah? Its less then 4,000. You are making a bigoted stereotype against 1.4 billion people based on the actions of 4,000?
Secondly, I gave you a plethora of recent examples of Christians who engaged in acts of violence in order to show the flawed logic of stereotyping an entire religion based on the actions of a few. My point in starting with the crusades was to show a systematic series of historical examples of Christians engaging in violence in the name of Christianity. I gave you a list of modern day examples of Christians who were engaging in violence including:
1. The participation of Christian clergymen in a genocide that resulted in 80,000 people.
1. The recent attacks against a Jewish synogague by a Pakistani Christian
2. The planned attacks by a group called 'The Seas of David' who studied the bible
What about the recent series of revealations that priests have been molesting children?
What about Adolf Hitler, who utilized Christianity for his twisted purposes?
How can you say that these actions aren't recent?
However, this is the point that seems to be going over your head. I do not believe Christianity is a violent, racist religion. I believe Christianity is a peaceful religion, but there are a handful of extremists in this religion every now and then who take their religion in the wrong direction and do horrible, evil things. I would not ever claim that all of Christianity is evil, even though there are some very terrible looking verses in the Bible and in the history of Christianity.
The same can be said of any religion. In India, some Hindus recently massacred Indian Muslims and Sikhs. In the Lebanese Civil War, both Jews and Christians participated in the massacre of Muslim palestinian refugees.
My point is that you are applying an inconsistent standard to Islam that you aren't applying to other religions. You cannot be at 'war' with an entire religion, especially when the adherents to that religion are peaceful citizens.
The 19 hijackers and all the other terrorists were bastards. However, the overwhelming majority of Muslims aren't like them. It doesn't make any sense to make a stereotype against 1.4 billion people based on the actions of a few.
Its illogical and xenophobic.
With Peace,
Abdulhaqq